compile-lucene:
[echo] Building analyzers...
Trying to override old definition of task m2-deploy
Trying to override old definition of task invoke-javadoc
javacc-uptodate-check:
javacc-notice:
jflex-uptodate-check:
jflex-notice:
common.init:
build-lucene:
Trying to override old
Hi Lance,
Thanks for your message.
I'm guessing you mean modify the Solrj auth mechanism on the server side.
In order to use the standard 'shards' parameter in client requests, the
problem occurs before
CommonHttpSolrServer, because the SearchHandler indeed passes an HttpClient
object to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Joe Calderon updated SOLR-1869:
---
Attachment: RemoveDupOffsetTokenFilterFactory.java
RemoveDupOffsetTokenFilter.java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12854972#action_12854972
]
Joe Calderon commented on SOLR-1869:
at the same position and Term text as the previous
Michael McCandless (JIRA) wrote:
Cutover to flex APIs
Key: SOLR-1868
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1868
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Michael McCandless
Fix For:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12854983#action_12854983
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-1869:
---
bq. this all started because the highlighter was
Hi Koji,
Contributions are very welcome :)
Unfortunately that wiki page is somewhat stale -- it hasn't been
updated based on what's been done on flex. But I think big change
for Solr is to cutover to FieldsEnum, TermsEnum, DocsEnum,
DocsAndPositionsEnum instead of TermEnum, TermDocs,
I'd like to merge solr cloud into trunk -
I think there may be some more polish to do, but its pretty close, and
back compatible if you choose not to run in zookeeper mode.
I think the next step for this first phase (there are still many
features to add) is to get it in trunk so we can get
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12855079#action_12855079
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1163:
I vote for a separate war: primarily because i think it
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to merge solr cloud into trunk -
Sounds like a good idea to me.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
I think there may be some more polish to do, but its pretty close, and back
compatible if you choose not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12855097#action_12855097
]
Erik Hatcher commented on SOLR-1163:
even with a separate WAR, we can still have this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12855108#action_12855108
]
Lance Norskog commented on SOLR-1238:
-
Please don't commit this. It is not a good fix.
Function Query map variant that allows target to be an arbitrary ValueSource
Key: SOLR-1871
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1871
Project: Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1871?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Harris updated SOLR-1871:
---
Attachment: SOLR-1871.patch
A first stab at this. In this implementation, we use copy and paste and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1871?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12855125#action_12855125
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1871:
Yep, makes sense. Some of the older
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12855127#action_12855127
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-1238:
---
isRepeatable means the payload stream can be read
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1871?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Harris updated SOLR-1871:
---
Attachment: SOLR-1871.patch
Clean up some sloppiness in RangeMapfFloatFunction, where target was
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1871?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12855133#action_12855133
]
Chris Harris commented on SOLR-1871:
bq. Yep, makes sense. Some of the older
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12855144#action_12855144
]
Joe Calderon commented on SOLR-1869:
yes, i think modifying the highlighter would be a
Getting authentications/authorizations is a tricky security problem.
Part of the cloud project (I think) is a configuration delivery tool,
which will make this a lot easier.
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:11 AM, Peter Sturge
peter.stu...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Lance,
Thanks for your message.
I'm
Document-level Access Control in Solr
-
Key: SOLR-1872
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1872
Project: Solr
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: SearchComponents - other
Affects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Peter Sturge updated SOLR-1872:
---
Attachment: SolrACLSecurity.rar
Document-level Access Control in Solr
for Solr is to cutover to FieldsEnum, TermsEnum, DocsEnum,
DocsAndPositionsEnum instead of TermEnum, TermDocs, TermPositions.
Hi Mike,
These lines are really helps for me, thanks!
Koji
--
http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
Commit Solr Cloud to trunk
--
Key: SOLR-1873
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1873
Project: Solr
Issue Type: New Feature
Affects Versions: 1.4
Reporter: Mark Miller
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12855271#action_12855271
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-1238:
--
I guess this patch should work for unauathenticated as
25 matches
Mail list logo
