[jira] Updated: (SOLR-199) N-gram

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adam Hiatt updated SOLR-199: Attachment: SOLR-199-n-gram.patch This is the new patch, not just cut out of SOLR-81... I removed references

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-199) N-gram

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12492948 ] Adam Hiatt commented on SOLR-199: - I'll make those changes. I agree that we don't want bloated base classes. > NGramTo

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-199) N-gram

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12492106 ] Adam Hiatt commented on SOLR-199: - Quoted: Adam, I think Yonik is just saying that the n-gram stuff I added to Lucene's

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-199) N-gram

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12492078 ] Adam Hiatt commented on SOLR-199: - Were you imagining that it just be included and that the users must use include a l

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-199) N-gram

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12485251 ] Adam Hiatt commented on SOLR-199: - I do in fact have a need. I am creating an edge n-gram index to provide auto-comple

[jira] Updated: (SOLR-199) N-gram

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adam Hiatt updated SOLR-199: Attachment: SOLR-81-ngram.patch Here is the patch. > N-gram > -- > > Key: SOLR-199 >

[jira] Created: (SOLR-199) N-gram

N-gram -- Key: SOLR-199 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-199 Project: Solr Issue Type: New Feature Components: search Reporter: Adam Hiatt Priority: Trivial This tracks the creation of a

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-81) Add Query Spellchecker functionality

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-81?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12478900 ] Adam Hiatt commented on SOLR-81: In essence, point 1) is true. However, the way I have been using the SpellChecker inde

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-81) Add Query Spellchecker functionality

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-81?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12478302 ] Adam Hiatt commented on SOLR-81: BTW updated patch added. > Add Query Spellchecker functionality >

[jira] Updated: (SOLR-81) Add Query Spellchecker functionality

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-81?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adam Hiatt updated SOLR-81: --- Attachment: SOLR-81-spellchecker.patch Good call on the DEFAULT_ACCURACY constant. BTW it should probably be .5.

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-81) Add Query Spellchecker functionality

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-81?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12477568 ] Adam Hiatt commented on SOLR-81: > Is spelling check normally going to be integrated into the "main" index, or > will i

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-81) Add Query Spellchecker functionality

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-81?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12477569 ] Adam Hiatt commented on SOLR-81: > Is spelling check normally going to be integrated into the "main" index, or > will i

[jira] Updated: (SOLR-81) Add Query Spellchecker functionality

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-81?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adam Hiatt updated SOLR-81: --- Attachment: SOLR-81-spellchecker.patch This patch was developed off of Otis's previous patch. It fixes a numSugg

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-81) Add Query Spellchecker functionality

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-81?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12473848 ] Adam Hiatt commented on SOLR-81: What was the bug? I couldn't tell from the Lucene issue description. > Add Query S

[jira] Created: (SOLR-158) [PATCH] New query slop option for DisMaxRequestHandler

[PATCH] New query slop option for DisMaxRequestHandler -- Key: SOLR-158 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-158 Project: Solr Issue Type: New Feature Components: searc

[jira] Updated: (SOLR-158) [PATCH] New query slop option for DisMaxRequestHandler

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-158?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adam Hiatt updated SOLR-158: Attachment: SOLR-158-dismax-query-slop.patch Relevant patch. > [PATCH] New query slop option for DisMaxReque

[jira] Updated: (SOLR-81) Add Query Spellchecker functionality

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-81?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adam Hiatt updated SOLR-81: --- Attachment: SOLR-81-edgengram-ngram.patch This new patch provides a superset of the functionality of Otis's orgi