[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12492948
]
Adam Hiatt commented on SOLR-199:
---------------------------------
I'll make those changes. I agree that we don't want bloated base classes.
> NGramTokenizerFactory is refering to constants from, and constructing an
> instance of, EdgeNGramTokenizer
Are you saying that this worries you b/c it is referenced in the example schema
and will thus break without the lucene-analyzers package? I do agree that this
example should probably be taken out for the time being (at the least).
> N-gram
> ------
>
> Key: SOLR-199
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-199
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: search
> Reporter: Adam Hiatt
> Priority: Trivial
> Attachments: SOLR-81-ngram.patch
>
>
> This tracks the creation of a patch that adds the n-gram/edge n-gram
> tokenizing functionality that was initially part of SOLR-81 (spell checking).
> This was taken out b/c the lucene SpellChecker class removed this dependency.
> None-the-less, I think this is useful functionality and the addition is
> trivial. How does everyone feel about such an addition?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
