fancy, and perhaps
something Solr already helps provide?
The question still remains - why isn't my cache available from a
firstSearcher .newSearcher() method? The cache is created prior (as
noted in the console output).
Erik
-Yonik
On 5/10/06, Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED
On May 10, 2006, at 5:31 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: Great question... it should be, as it's created and registered in
the
: SolrIndexSearcher constructor. is the cache .name() returning the
: right thing?
I was just about to ask that. it wasn't untill i started digging into
CacheCOnfig
On May 10, 2006, at 6:38 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
On May 10, 2006, at 5:31 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: Great question... it should be, as it's created and registered
in the
: SolrIndexSearcher constructor. is the cache .name() returning the
: right thing?
I was just about to ask
On May 9, 2006, at 12:39 PM, Mike Baranczak wrote:
On May 9, 2006, at 11:11 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
Right, I implemented this (patch pasted below)
Which file is this patch for?
StandardRequestHandler - and the patch may not apply with patch
since it was pasted into e-mail
On Apr 26, 2006, at 9:41 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been mulling over the idea of having a single Solr instance
morph into system that can handle multiple client-defined schemas
(why not? Lucene itself can handle it) rather than a static XML file
I'm adding multiple documents per add POST and getting a response
that looks like this:
result status=0/resultresult status=0/resultresult
status=0/resultresult status=0/resultresult status=0/
resultresult status=0/result
This response is several separate XML documents, rather than a
Anyone here an old timer Apple Newton user?
I've been really getting jazzed on the ideas I'm getting thanks to
Solr and contemplating Ruby integration. I've been re-reading my
dusty Programming for the Newton (using Windows!) book. The
discussion of the Newton soup data storage mechanism
On Apr 21, 2006, at 1:53 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: For LocalSolrQueryRequest, since it is using a Map for the arguments
: anyway, I simply added the new getParams method to return a single
: item array.
I would suggest that LocalSolrRequest be modified a little more so
that if
the value
I encountered an escaping issue with XMLWriter. Locally I've added
the following test to BasicFunctionalityTest to demonstrate:
public void testXMLWriter() throws Exception {
SolrQueryResponse rsp = new SolrQueryResponse();
rsp.add(\quoted\, value);
StringWriter writer = new
In my application I'm POSTing into the Solr for querying, and need to
specify any number of constraints (which correspond to BitSet
filters that get combined into a BitDocSet as a filter on the
query). Rather than have the client uniquely name each of the
parameters, I want to name them
I've finally revisited this issue. I switched to Tomcat (5.5.16) and
all is well, so it certainly appears as if this is a Jetty issue.
*sigh*
I'll look into whether there is a newer version of Jetty and if that
fixes this.
I did make some improvements to text encoding in my indexing
It would require some work to add this to Solr, but not a huge
effort. One of the most crucial missing pieces that I'm beginning to
feel a strong need for is being able to update a single field in a
Lucene index. I notice the GData protocol supports this:
On Apr 12, 2006, at 12:36 AM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: Is there a way to find out what string is being written (perhaps
: modify the code to catch that particular exception and display the
: string)
:
: I know its a bunch of text I culled from pages like this:
:
:
On Apr 6, 2006, at 3:41 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
Erik: Are you just talking about using load-on-startup for a
servlet, or is there some other recent addition to he Servlet spec for
registering an arbitrary class that should be constructed once per
application with init/destroy methods that
Modern day servlet spec allows for an initialization hook so a
servlet init hack to get things initialized is not needed these
days. What is the minimum servlet spec that Solr is aimed for?
Erik
On Apr 5, 2006, at 4:53 PM, Hoss Man (JIRA) wrote:
[
601 - 615 of 615 matches
Mail list logo
