It's a highlighter bug, so...
On Nov 2, 2009, at 7:18 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
FYI, It looks like Lucene 2.9.1 is having another respin:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2013
I'm busy packing for ApacheCon - not sure what the implications are
for Solr yet... it's going to be spotty
I used this with an existing application (with a 1.3 schema+solrconfig) and
then another with (an old 1.4 trunk schema+solrconfig). Everything looks
fine. Memory usage has decreased.
However, I've seen at least two reports in solr-user about memory usage
increasing rapidly when jars are dropped
+1
On Oct 30, 2009, at 9:40 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
OK, take 3: http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0/
On Oct 30, 2009, at 8:10 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Got it. Will upload shortly.
On Oct 29, 2009, at 8:33 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Yonik
A happy non binding +1!
On Nov 2, 2009, at 10:30 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
+1
On Oct 30, 2009, at 9:40 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
OK, take 3: http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0/
On Oct 30, 2009, at 8:10 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Got it. Will upload shortly.
On Oct 29,
+1
Tested on Redhat EL5 with SUN Java 1.6.0_16 and Resin 3.0.23. All my custom
Solr plugins (TokenFilter, RequestHandler, SearchComponent, QParserPlugin,
QParser, and UpdateRequestProcessor) work as expected without any problem.
Nice job everyone:-)
Bill
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Eric
FYI, It looks like Lucene 2.9.1 is having another respin:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2013
I'm busy packing for ApacheCon - not sure what the implications are
for Solr yet... it's going to be spotty communication all week due to
the number of us traveling.
-Yonik
+1
On Oct 30, 2009, at 12:40 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
OK, take 3: http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0/
On Oct 30, 2009, at 8:10 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Got it. Will upload shortly.
On Oct 29, 2009, at 8:33 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Yonik
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
OK, take 3: http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0/
+1
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
Got it. Will upload shortly.
On Oct 29, 2009, at 8:33 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
Lucene 2.9.1 respin 3 vote has started... I'm downloading now and
will
test + check in.
Done. You're up Grant!
-Yonik
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
shalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com
wrote:
So what we feared has come to pass - Lucene found more bugs and is
going to restart the release.
The bugs found however, don't
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Yes, it's too bad!
But you will replace the lucene jars in the artifacts before releasing?
Because it would not be good to have jar files with version 2.9.1 in the
package that are not the officially released 2.9.1
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.comwrote:
OK... looks like we'll need to re-spin.
We may have a few hours till that happens. Perhaps we should get in a
couple of the little bug fixes mentioned earlier.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1529
Just make sure you apply the patches to the branch, too. Or, we can
delete the branch and recreate it.
On Oct 29, 2009, at 9:06 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
OK... looks like we'll need to re-spin.
We may have a few hours till that happens. Perhaps we should get in a
couple of the little bug
Looks like excludes clause in packaging is excluding everyting under classes
which the missing file is.
src/test/test-files/solr/lib/classes/empty-file-main-lib.txt
$ grep classes build.xml
target name=javadoc-contrib description=Generate javadoc for
contrib classes depends=build-contrib
Lucene 2.9.1 respin 3 vote has started... I'm downloading now and will
test + check in.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
Lucene 2.9.1 respin 3 vote has started... I'm downloading now and will
test + check in.
Done. You're up Grant!
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
+1
Integrated with my app, and things work well. (windows vista)
Ran examples and everything worked as expected. (Mac OSX)
On Oct 27, 2009, at 10:07 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
OK, new artifacts are up.
On Oct 27, 2009, at 9:51 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: By other issues, I mean the
Not sure who gets a vote, and this is my first message to this list, but I
wanted to add that I deployed the maven artifacts (along with the lucene
2.9.1 ones) to my in house maven repository and successfully built all my
solr dependant projects with
dependency
On Oct 28, 2009, at 9:12 PM, Nicholas Letourneau wrote:
Not sure who gets a vote,
Everyone gets to vote -- officially some votes are 'binding' but in
practice this does not really matter.
The more feedback there is, the more confidence we have that things
are good (or need fixed)
I'm feeling emptiness, too. Looks like I forgot the public_html part
when copying. All is restored now.
On Oct 26, 2009, at 10:14 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Grant Ingersoll
gsing...@apache.org wrote:
OK, take two is up in the same place. Please vote.
I'm
: OK, take two is up in the same place. Please vote.
I thought we'd fixed this, but we still several dependency jars included
multiple times in the release artifacts...
hoss...@brunner:~/tmp/solr1.4$ find apache-solr-1.4.0 -name \*.jar | perl -ple
's{.*/}{}' | sort | uniq -c | sort -r | perl
On Oct 27, 2009, at 3:14 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: OK, take two is up in the same place. Please vote.
I thought we'd fixed this, but we still several dependency jars
included
multiple times in the release artifacts...
hoss...@brunner:~/tmp/solr1.4$ find apache-solr-1.4.0 -name \*.jar
: Hmm, I thought I removed that one. beta5 should not be in there.
I see you changed this on the branch .. were you planning on making a new
release candidate?
-Hoss
On Oct 27, 2009, at 7:31 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: Hmm, I thought I removed that one. beta5 should not be in there.
I see you changed this on the branch .. were you planning on making
a new
release candidate?
I'll cut another one. Although I'm not fixing the other issues.
On Oct 27, 2009, at 9:08 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Oct 27, 2009, at 7:31 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: Hmm, I thought I removed that one. beta5 should not be in there.
I see you changed this on the branch .. were you planning on making
a new
release candidate?
I'll cut another
: By other issues, I mean the duplicate libs. I think we can live with them.
I agree ... i would have voted +1 already but i figured based on your
commit you were in the process of doing a new one.
-Hoss
OK, new artifacts are up.
On Oct 27, 2009, at 9:51 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: By other issues, I mean the duplicate libs. I think we can live
with them.
I agree ... i would have voted +1 already but i figured based on your
commit you were in the process of doing a new one.
-Hoss
: OK, new artifacts are up.
+1
And for the record, these are the artifacts my vote is based on...
8166f7f23637fa8a7d84c3cd30aa21ab apache-solr-1.4.0.tgz
f7ffa8669e12271981c212733bee1ec0 apache-solr-1.4.0.zip
-Hoss
+1 also
I'll have a look at the duplicate libs issue as soon as I can, but
won't be until after/during next week (ApacheCon).
Erik
On Oct 27, 2009, at 10:41 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: OK, new artifacts are up.
+1
And for the record, these are the artifacts my vote is based
I shall fix https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1527 for 1.4 I guess
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Erik Hatcher erik.hatc...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 also
I'll have a look at the duplicate libs issue as soon as I can, but won't be
until after/during next week (ApacheCon).
Erik
2009/10/27 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् noble.p...@corp.aol.com:
I shall fix https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1527 for 1.4 I guess
Perhaps we should just document this?
It's not a regression, but a new, non-core feature. If we delay every
time we find a bug, this release will never end.
OK . Let us push it to 1.5.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Ryan McKinley ryan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 28, 2009, at 12:07 AM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: It's not a regression, but a new, non-core feature. If we delay every
: time we find a bug, this release will never end.
agreed.
Tis the season for releases...
Please vote on releasing the Solr 1.4.0 artifacts located at http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0/
(note, solr.tar and solr-maven.tar are not artifacts to be released)
CHANGES are spelled out at
Hmmm, weren't you going to update the version numbers to 1.4.1-dev
like we just discussed in the other thread?
That way if someone changes some of the solr source from the download
and recompiles, they don't get a version number of 1.4.0
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Mon, Oct 26,
Also, not sure what the policy is on voting on files where the pom
still needs to change..
http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0/maven/org/apache/solr/solr-core/1.4.0/solr-core-1.4.0.pom
points to:
dependency
groupIdorg.apache.lucene/groupId
artifactIdlucene-analyzers/artifactId
I can do it again. The generation process is pretty easy now.
On Oct 26, 2009, at 6:42 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
Also, not sure what the policy is on voting on files where the pom
still needs to change..
Yes.
I need to update the POMs too, so scratch this vote for a little bit.
On Oct 26, 2009, at 6:35 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
Hmmm, weren't you going to update the version numbers to 1.4.1-dev
like we just discussed in the other thread?
That way if someone changes some of the solr source from
OK, take two is up in the same place. Please vote.
On Oct 26, 2009, at 6:15 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Tis the season for releases...
Please vote on releasing the Solr 1.4.0 artifacts located at http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0/
(note, solr.tar and solr-maven.tar are not
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
OK, take two is up in the same place. Please vote.
I'm seeing emptiness at
http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0/
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Oct 26, 2009, at 6:15 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
39 matches
Mail list logo
