[VOTE] SOLR-1602 Refactor SOLR package structure to include o.a.solr.response and move QueryResponseWriters in there

2009-12-30 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
Hi All, I've reported SOLR-1602, the jist of which is to move all the response writers into a new package, o.a.solr.response (and also move SolrQueryResponse in there). We know what's required to do this: SOLR-1602 proposed plan

Re: [VOTE] SOLR-1602 Refactor SOLR package structure to include o.a.solr.response and move QueryResponseWriters in there

2009-12-30 Thread Ryan McKinley
Here's what you're voting on: [ x] Yes, move forward with SOLR-1602 with the plan proposed above [ ] No, don't move forward with SOLR-1602 because... I'll leave the vote open for 72 hours. Votes from SOLR committers are binding, but everyone is welcome to voice your opinion. Not to throw

Re: [VOTE] SOLR-1602 Refactor SOLR package structure to include o.a.solr.response and move QueryResponseWriters in there

2009-12-30 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
Hi Ryan, Not to throw cold water on the formality... but.. when I suggested we get broader approval, i was not thinking about jumping into a formal vote... Ah, the Apache way :) Seems odd to put a three day window while many people are on vacation :) I hear you, but based on mail

Re: [VOTE] SOLR-1602 Refactor SOLR package structure to include o.a.solr.response and move QueryResponseWriters in there

2009-12-30 Thread Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ्
I have not taken a look at the patch (could not apply it) . But I am in agreement with the idea of moving responsewriters to a new package. Just that the changes should be backward compatible On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Ryan McKinley ryan...@gmail.com wrote: Here's what you're voting on: