Hi All,
I've reported SOLR-1602, the jist of which is to move all the response
writers into a new package, o.a.solr.response (and also move
SolrQueryResponse in there).
We know what's required to do this:
SOLR-1602 proposed plan
Here's what you're voting on:
[ x] Yes, move forward with SOLR-1602 with the plan proposed above
[ ] No, don't move forward with SOLR-1602 because...
I'll leave the vote open for 72 hours. Votes from SOLR committers are
binding, but everyone is welcome to voice your opinion.
Not to throw
Hi Ryan,
Not to throw cold water on the formality... but.. when I suggested we
get broader approval, i was not thinking about jumping into a formal
vote...
Ah, the Apache way :)
Seems odd to put a three day window while many people are on vacation :)
I hear you, but based on mail
I have not taken a look at the patch (could not apply it) . But I am
in agreement with the idea of moving responsewriters to a new package.
Just that the changes should be backward compatible
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Ryan McKinley ryan...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's what you're voting on: