[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12616923#action_12616923
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-269:
---
While I like the syntax of the config (getting rid of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12616927#action_12616927
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-269:
I also like the simplified syntax, and I think the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12616932#action_12616932
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-269:
bq. A request scope will create the chain or
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12616949#action_12616949
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-269:
bq. This gets overly complex too...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12616966#action_12616966
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-269:
-
The idea is to make the API simple. If a Processor wishes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12616457#action_12616457
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-269:
I've read through most of the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12616483#action_12616483
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-269:
bq. Not trying to be critical but seems like this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12616511#action_12616511
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-269:
-
bq.Many processors need to maintain state within a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12616520#action_12616520
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-269:
bq. If each processor were shared
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12616544#action_12616544
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-269:
I'm all for simplifying the API. If you guys want
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12616649#action_12616649
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-269:
---
bq. But we do have SolrQueryRequest#getContext to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12512502
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-269:
---
How do you all feel about the basic structure?
It's a go!
It will get more
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12512356
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-269:
the RequestHandler has final say over what Processor gets used
absolutely!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12511178
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-269:
---
One issue: the current way of having a custom processor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12511195
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-269:
Hymm. the behavior on trunk is:
requestHandler name=/customupdate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12511198
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-269:
---
I made it a 1-1 relation (processor-handler) to avoid a hash lookup for each
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12511206
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-269:
---
the idea of letting people override the processor on a per request basis seems
very
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12510749
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-269:
---
I'm not sure we need to have XML configuration for this
If we have those
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12510759
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-269:
The only one I'm not sure about is:
- explicit flow control between
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12510771
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-269:
---
The only one I'm not sure about is:
- explicit flow control between
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12510774
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-269:
It's a single call per hook:
if (next != null) next.processAdd();
Ok.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12510425
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-269:
---
FYI, I'm working up a prototype right now to handle multiple request
FYI, I'm working up a prototype right now to handle multiple request processors.
excellent.
check: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-139
to see how I was thinking about supporting multiple processors.
Essentially a single parent processor that may loop through
'transformers' or
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12510484
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-269:
I like the AddUpdateCommand changes
What do you see as the common use case
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12510487
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-269:
---
What do you see as the common use case for wanting to chain request
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12510504
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-269:
---
Some other issues how to configure processors for multiple update handlers?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12510506
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-269:
- conditional copyField, field transformations (between multiple fields
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12510510
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-269:
Some other issues how to configure processors for multiple update
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12510563
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-269:
perhaps the extra functionality of transformations and updating should be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12510004
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-269:
---
Different Q on usage: is this where my document mutator stuff should go??? If
I want
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12510009
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-269:
getCore(), getSchema(), getUpdateHandler() all just return instance
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12509725
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-269:
---
Looking at UpdateRequestProcessor further, it seems like these should be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12509732
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-269:
---
I think the newly added incremental time should not be on by default, as well
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12509733
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-269:
maybe. I'm not sure I totally understand your suggestion though.
I need
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12509734
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-269:
I think the newly added incremental time should not be on by default, as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12509737
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-269:
---
I need something that is easily subclassed and can cleanly holds state across
36 matches
Mail list logo
