[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12623247#action_12623247
]
Lars Kotthoff commented on SOLR-683:
Yonik, you're right -- there're separate acceptor th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12622910#action_12622910
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-683:
---
I just rolled back the second commit... I think just u
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12622906#action_12622906
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-683:
---
bq. The connection is only accepted if there's a threa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12622764#action_12622764
]
Lars Kotthoff commented on SOLR-683:
bq. Not sure if this is still the case, but I believ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12622705#action_12622705
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-683:
--
>> When jetty runs out of handler threads, does it not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12622706#action_12622706
]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on SOLR-683:
---
Hm, hard to tell from sparse Jetty javadocs.
h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12622700#action_12622700
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-683:
---
Hmmm I see this was just committed, but are we sure it
Solr is not going to solve your DDOS attack issues no what whats put in
place I would think - if it was made a focus to do that type of thing,
it would be a bit like trying to hold the dyke together with your
finger. What was the name of that Israeli security company that was
DDOS'd out of exi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12621666#action_12621666
]
Lars Kotthoff commented on SOLR-683:
Another way to handle this would be to configure the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12621642#action_12621642
]
Cameron commented on SOLR-683:
--
We could up the number of threads in our container, but this doe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12621616#action_12621616
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-683:
---
bq. So this seems to be a container level issue, not a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12621612#action_12621612
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-683:
---
I duplicated a deadlock with two shards with 1000 clie
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12621594#action_12621594
]
Cameron commented on SOLR-683:
--
So this seems to be a container level issue, not a Solr issue?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12621584#action_12621584
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-683:
---
Here's the problem: deadlock is possible when the max
14 matches
Mail list logo
