On 2/12/07, Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>... * A newer version of Lucene's JAR: to have *:* syntax...
+0, don't know enough about the issues to comment.
FWIW, I'm currently using the current lucene trunk with no apparently problems.
2.1 appears extremely close to r
On 2/12/07, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... * SOLR-79: to allow launching a common schema/config with various
data directories...
+1
... * A newer version of Lucene's JAR: to have *:* syntax...
+0, don't know enough about the issues to comment.
-Bertrand
On 2/12/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So I'm fine with updating to the latest Lucene nightly build now... It
would give us a chance to make sure it works well for us too. Lucene
2.1 shouldn't be too far off... but I'm sick yet again, and it's hard
enough writing email in this stat
On 2/12/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: * A newer version of Lucene's JAR: to have *:* syntax.
+0 ... i don't really have any opinion about reving Lucene as far as the
nbightly builds go ... I think yonik menitoned before that it would be
good to make sure Solr 1.2 used a
: * SOLR-79: to allow launching a common schema/config with various
: data directories.
+1
: * A newer version of Lucene's JAR: to have *:* syntax.
+0 ... i don't really have any opinion about reving Lucene as far as the
nbightly builds go ... I think yonik menitoned before that it
By the way, for many speakers its a classic dilemma to have folks,
especially those that didn't attend the event itself, to request
slides. The best speakers speak way more than their slides say, so
you miss a lot by simply viewing slides.
I fully agree. But something is better then nothing :-)
On Feb 12, 2007, at 2:48 AM, rubdabadub wrote:
On 2/12/07, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm in my last ditch procrastinating efforts to get my code4lib pre-
conference organized where I'll be teach Solr and Lucene, and guiding
a hands-on workshop to help 85 library geeks come up to
On 2/12/07, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm in my last ditch procrastinating efforts to get my code4lib pre-
conference organized where I'll be teach Solr and Lucene, and guiding
a hands-on workshop to help 85 library geeks come up to speed with
Solr.
Will the transcript/presentatio
using a hack of Resin's CronResource. Not sure if there is a more generic way
to do this using non-Resin code.
- Original Message
From: Bill Au <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 7:56:51 AM
Subject: Re: commit
The snapshooter
The snapshooter can be run manaully. So one can disable the postCommit
listener
and run it manually to take snapshots at specific times rather than after
every commit.
Bill
On 4/23/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Jason,
>
> On 4/21/06, jason rutherglen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
Hi Jason,
On 4/21/06, jason rutherglen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a way to decouple the snapshot creation from the index reloading
> currently? If not I was going to build it in. We have a 700 meg index, so
> creating a snapshot basically copies that, and after several snapshots tak
ED]>
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 5:28:15 PM
Subject: Re: commit
: In using Solr I've found the need to have a reload command in addition
: to a commit. The reason for this is sometimes updates are made but are
: not available via the server. The commit makes a snapshot which on a
:
: In using Solr I've found the need to have a reload command in addition
: to a commit. The reason for this is sometimes updates are made but are
: not available via the server. The commit makes a snapshot which on a
: large index is a potentially expensive operation. Is there a way to do
: rel
I am getting email triggered by your commits.
Bill
On 2/24/06, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is kind of weird ... I've commited several things tonight, and Yonik
> has commited several things ... and I'm getting emails about yonik's
> commits via [email protected]
I just moderated them through. They'll flow through automatically
from you now.
Erik
On Feb 24, 2006, at 10:11 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
This is kind of weird ... I've commited several things tonight, and
Yonik
has commited several things ... and I'm getting emails about yonik'
you probably need to get your user-id approved.
It's a standard problem on the ASF commit lists...
On 2/25/06, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is kind of weird ... I've commited several things tonight, and Yonik
> has commited several things ... and I'm getting emails about yo
16 matches
Mail list logo
