Re: javadoc location?

2007-05-02 Thread Ryan McKinley
1 May 2007 10:52:16 -0700 (PDT) : From: Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : Reply-To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org : To: Solr Dev : Subject: Re: javadoc location? : : : : goes to: : : http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/index.html (404) : : : : we should probably fix that! : : The link is

Re: javadoc location?

2007-05-01 Thread Chris Hostetter
: goes to: : http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/index.html (404) : : we should probably fix that! The link is correct, that's where they are suppose to be -- the problem seems to be that buildingthe javadocs is currently broken When i run "ant javadoc" locally i'm getting a bunch of warnings a

Re: javadoc location?

2007-05-01 Thread Chris Hostetter
about messing it up. I certainly won't object if any other committers want to do it. : Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 10:52:16 -0700 (PDT) : From: Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : Reply-To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org : To: Solr Dev : Subject: Re: javadoc location? : : : : goe

Re: javadoc location

2006-12-16 Thread Chris Hostetter
: > OK, I fixed nightly.sh and pointed the website at api : : I also just added a symlink from docs/api to api so older wiki links : won't break. : I think that should work. yeah ... the one other little thing is making the links point at "api/index.html" istead of "api/" so that the local links

Re: javadoc location

2006-12-16 Thread Yonik Seeley
On 12/16/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 12/16/06, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i was just thinking that if on the live site, we created "api" directly in > the main site directory (whatever it's called) then the relative link of > "./api/index.html" would work fine

Re: javadoc location

2006-12-16 Thread Yonik Seeley
On 12/16/06, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: i was just thinking that if on the live site, we created "api" directly in the main site directory (whatever it's called) then the relative link of "./api/index.html" would work fine for the site navigation (and would work with what i added

Re: javadoc location

2006-12-15 Thread Chris Hostetter
: > We may want to move stuff arround on the site so a relative link can work : > better. : : We could generate "docs" under "site" and that would fix the problem. : Or are you thinking of moving everything in the real site under : another directory so that docs could be ../docs ? i was just thin