Thinking about http://lucene.markmail.org/message/mef4cdo7m3s6i3fc?q=background+merge+exception
, it occurred to me that we probably should refactor Solr's offering
of compression. Currently, we rely on Field.COMPRESS from Lucene, but
this really isn't considered best practice, see
Agreed. It was the simplest thing to do at the time, but it would
definitely be preferrable to offer the much faster lesser levels of
compression.
-Mike
On 3-Sep-08, at 8:57 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Thinking about
Also I see that another Lucene bug (LUCENE-1374) was found relating to
compressed fields in lucene (when we first added compressed field
support to solr a lucene bug involving lazy-loaded fields and
compression was uncovered, too).
It would be good to change the implementation simply to
