Re: Can't add new data or optimize

2006-10-30 Thread Mike Klaas
On 10/30/06, Kevin Lewandowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm no longer able to add new data or optimize my index. There are currently 1600 files in the index directory and it's about 1.1gb. I've tried changing solrconfig.xml to use the compound file format and that didn't make a difference. My

Re: Can't add new data or optimize

2006-10-30 Thread Yonik Seeley
On 10/30/06, Kevin Lewandowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm no longer able to add new data or optimize my index. There are currently 1600 files in the index directory and it's about 1.1gb. I've tried changing solrconfig.xml to use the compound file format and that didn't make a difference. My

Re: downloaded wars can't deploy

2006-10-30 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
This is what I just stuck in my Solr SVN checkout, so I can build + deploy the app: rm -rfv /usr/local/jetty/work/* \ ant dist-war \ cp dist/solr-1.0.war /usr/local/jetty/webapps/solr.war pushd /usr/local/jetty/ \ java -classpath `/simpy/bin/addjars /usr/local/jetty/lib`:`/simpy/bin/addjars

Re: downloaded wars can't deploy

2006-10-30 Thread Mike Klaas
On 10/30/06, Otis Gospodnetic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is what I just stuck in my Solr SVN checkout, so I can build + deploy the app: This is not ideal though, as every time I make a change I need to run this, remove old files, build a war, deploy it, and wait a few seconds for Jetty

Re: replication test problems

2006-10-30 Thread Chris Hostetter
: Here's a problem I got. It says there's no match for snapshot.* found on the : master box. This is wrong, there's one such file exists. : : - I then ran snappuller specifically on the snap file that's on the master: : ./bin/snappuller -n snapshot.20061023172655 : : This time it worked. and

Spellchecker in Solr?

2006-10-30 Thread Michael Imbeault
Hello everyone, Has anybody successfully implemented a Lucene spellchecker within Solr? If so, could you give details on how one would achieve this? If not, is it planned to make it as standard within Solr? Its a feature almost every Solr application would want to use, so I think it would be

Re: downloaded wars can't deploy

2006-10-30 Thread Chris Hostetter
: My setup is relatively primitive, since my Solr dev time is limited. : All of my changes have been developed using unit tests and the example : app. Make a change, 'ant -Dtestcase=... test' (with an occasional : 'ant clean'). To test with the example, 'ant clean example', Ctrl-C : the open

Re: replication test problems

2006-10-30 Thread Yu-Hui Jin
Hi, Hoss, Thanks for the reply! For #2, I think I just need to setup the passwordless SSH with empty passphase. right? For #1: I'm using the following Enterprise version: Linux version 2.4.21-37a6 (gcc version 3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-47)) I tried to run the find command find

Re: Spellchecker in Solr?

2006-10-30 Thread Kevin Lewandowski
I have not done one but have been planning to do it based on this article: http://today.java.net/pub/a/today/2005/08/09/didyoumean.html With Solr it would be much simpler than the java examples they give. On 10/30/06, Michael Imbeault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello everyone, Has anybody

Trimming the list of docs returned.

2006-10-30 Thread Tom
Hi - I'd like to be able to limit the number of documents returned from any particular group of documents, much as Google only shows a max of two results from any one website. The docs are all marked as to which group they belong to. There will probably be multiple groups returned from any

Re: Spellchecker in Solr?

2006-10-30 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
I just wrote this for Technorati the other day for our internal hackaton. It was pretty simple. It doesn't use Solr, but it could. It uses Jetty's HTTP handler, which I highly recomment. It acts as a web service that responds to HTTP GET requests that contain a query, and it return

Re: Spellchecker in Solr?

2006-10-30 Thread Kevin Lewandowski
I had the very same article in mind - how would it be simpler in Solr than in Lucene? A spellchecker is pretty much standard in every major I meant it would be a simpler implementation in Solr because you don't have to deal with java or any Lucene API's. You just create a document for each