Re: Solr Security and XSRF

SOLR-607 is still open.Till it is committed this solution may not be poossible --Noble On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ् <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you have a master slave configuration I guess it is a good idea to > remove the updatehandler altogether from slaves. >

Re: Solr Security and XSRF

If you have a master slave configuration I guess it is a good idea to remove the updatehandler altogether from slaves. --Noble On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 2:39 AM, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > : > A basic technique that can be used to mitigate the risk of a possible CSRF > : > attack

Re: Problems with Stored Field

On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 19:40:44 -0300 "Hugo Barauna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am having problems with a stored field. The problem is that field is not > being stored as I need it to be. It has a tokenizer > class="solr.HTMLStripWhitespaceTokenizerFactory", but when it is stored, > that tokenize

Problems with Stored Field

Hi Folks, I am having problems with a stored field. The problem is that field is not being stored as I need it to be. It has a tokenizer class="solr.HTMLStripWhitespaceTokenizerFactory", but when it is stored, that tokenizer is not applied. That tokenizer is only applied for the inverted index of

Re: Benchmarking tools?

Nice question! O would like to know some solutions in this fileld too. On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Jacob Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi folks, > > Does anyone have any bright ideas on how to benchmark solr? Unless > someone has something better, here is what I am thinking: > > 1. Hav

Benchmarking tools?

Hi folks, Does anyone have any bright ideas on how to benchmark solr? Unless someone has something better, here is what I am thinking: 1. Have a config file where one can specify info like how many docs, how large, how many facets, and how many updates / searches per minute 2. Use one of the va

[OFF-TOPIC] Lucene Users Group at LinkedIn

Hi! I would like invite you guys that are LinkedIn users to join the Lucene User Group, grouping all developers with skills in this opensource solution together making a little easier to find then at LinkedIn. Please follow this link if you are interested: http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/82282/5337

Re: using dismax with additional query?

aw, of course... the standard query parameters can be used with dismax... sorry for the silly question! - bram -- http://www.freesound.org http://www.smartelectronix.com http://www.musicdsp.org On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 11:59 AM, climbingrose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Bram, > You can use

Re: using dismax with additional query?

Hi Bram, You can use filter query (fq) to limit your results: fq=tag:sometag&q=user_input_here Have a look at dismax and standard query documentation on the wiki. On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Bram de Jong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hello all, > > I would like to combine the DisMaxReques

using dismax with additional query?

hello all, I would like to combine the DisMaxRequestHandler for processing user searches, but I would like the -aditionally- add more query parameters. For example, the user want to search inside all the documents tagged with one particular tag (a tag he clicked). So, I would like to define: reg