Hi,
I can not speak for the community but I believe IT IS STILL opened :-)
Welcome!
Rgds,
Lukas
2008/8/29 brosseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> is this thing still open for propositions ? we have an in house graphical
> artist and i could ask him to take a shot he does very nice work.
>
> 2008/8/20 Lu
is this thing still open for propositions ? we have an in house graphical
artist and i could ask him to take a shot he does very nice work.
2008/8/20 Lukáš Vlček <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi,
>
> Only few responded so far. How we can get more feedback? Do you think I
> should work on the proposal a l
Hi,
I have a multivalued field that I would want to score individually for each
value. Is there an easy way to do that?
Here's a concrete example of what I'm trying to achieve:
Let's say that I have 3 documents with a field "name_t" and a multivalued
field "caracteristic_t_mv":
Dog
Cool
Big
Di
: I don't think Hoss wants to be involved in the logo contest beyond the
: guidance he gave ;)
I want to be involved in so much as i want to make sure things are done in
a fair way that has well defined guidelines and boundaries and engages
the community ... i have less interest in what the act
: 1) INFO: PERFORMANCE WARNING: Overlapping onDeckSearchers=2
There's a FAQ on this...
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FAQ#head-1133543d05c65f889b25b85b3c7aaa17f532032a
...additional info can be found by searching the list archives for
"PERFORMANCE WARNING"
: 2) SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.Solr
Well I've done two or three more runs with Sun java build
1.6.0_10-rc-b28, with and without the infoStream change, and I can't
reproduce the problem. So maybe everything was indeed the fault of the
release version of Sun hotspot. Not too confident about that. Maybe
instead I let the disk get too fu
This is somewhere in the mail archives. The AND/OR/NOT syntax is binary. The
+/- syntax is ternary: (+one -two three) means: "must have one, cannot have
two, things with three have a higher score".
-Original Message-
From: Lyman Hurd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 20
We're using the default installation.
I have been through:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrQuerySyntax
and
http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/queryparsersyntax.html
carefully but this appears to be a case unto itself!
Cheers,
Lyman
Lyman Hurd
Sr. Principal Engineer
Interwoven, Inc.
404.2
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 12:06:52PM -0700, Lyman Hurd wrote:
> We are trying to use the "+" (mandatory) and "- "(forbidden) modifiers
> in field queries but we do not seem to be getting what we expected.
Which analyzer are you using? The StandardRequestHandler should give
the results you are looki
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 12:34 AM, Chris Hostetter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> it also starts to get ito the realm of "arbitrary processing of values
> prior to storing/indexing ... which could be useful in other ways (ie:
> parsing alternate date formats) and for other field types (ie: limit
> num
Uh, I'm not sure if this is in the Lucene FAQ, but it ought to be. The "+"
means that the term/clause MUST be in a document if a document is to be counted
as a match. The "-" means that the term/clause MUST NOT be in a document if a
document is to be counted as a match.
Is this even syntactic
Doesn't this then also start sounding like various pre-indexing processing
pipelines? I remember one person (was it somebody from Norway?) saying he has
OpenPipe+Solr working hm, one "yahoo" away:
http://openpipe.berlios.de/
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutc
Hello all,
Quick question for those familiar with termPositions and payloads:
I have currently 2 loops, one which is of the form
while(termPositions.next()) and the second involves termPositions.freq()
the combination of these two seem to produce a great number of duplicate
payloads; So I'm think
We are trying to use the "+" (mandatory) and "- "(forbidden) modifiers
in field queries but we do not seem to be getting what we expected.
Specifically our query is:
field1:(-value1) field2:value2
as an alternative we tried:
-field1:value1 field2:value2
which appears to behave
: I propose the following syntax similar to the DateMath syntax:
...
: Any date will be rounded to the nearest specified time and less significant
: units will be set to their least possible value.
: If it is not desirable to round to nearest element (many times users don't
: want a value
When using the MoreLikeThisHandler with facets turned on, the facets show
counts of things that are more like my original document. When I use the
MoreLikeThisComponent, the facets show counts of things that match my
original document (I'm querying by document ID), so there is only one
result, and
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Jason Rutherglen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am interested in using NumberUtils to encode any number into a sortable
> double. Once encoded will the lexicographic sorting work on any precision?
> If I store 47. and 48.22 may I assume that the order will
Hello,
I am interested in using NumberUtils to encode any number into a sortable
double. Once encoded will the lexicographic sorting work on any precision?
If I store 47. and 48.22 may I assume that the order will be
correct? I ask this questions because doubleToRawLongBits is called to
Just beware, as you can lost old data if you don't send it again to Solr on
your update.
2008/8/26 Smiley, David W. (DSMILEY) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> You can modify the schema file but you'll need to reload Solr for Solr to
> see be aware of it. You can use multiCore to eliminate downtime. But at
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:13 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, I was thinking of something similar, too. Would the following be
> even simpler?
>
>
> omitNorms="true" round="UP_MINUTE" />
> or
> omitNorms="true" round="DOWN_MINUTE" />
>
> - Single new attrib name.
> - Sh
Is it possible that the index is corrupted? Did you try re indexing it?
-Raghu
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Hinegardner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 11:34 AM
To: Solr Users
Subject: java.io.FileNotFoundException: no segments* file found
Hi all,
I've had
Yeah, I was thinking of something similar, too. Would the following be even
simpler?
or
- Single new attrib name.
- Shorted attrib name.
- No +/- and number+time unit mix
- Self-descriptive and "naturally readable", e.g.: round up to minutes
What do you think?
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://se
Hi Otis,
This seems like a common use-case since it is suggested often. We should add
this capability to the solr.DateField.
I propose the following syntax similar to the DateMath syntax:
Any date will be rounded to the nearest specified time and less significant
units will be set to their le
I was just dealing with this issue the other day!
My solution was to have PHP re-parse the dates to always be exactly at
midnight of their respective day (so that the extra time info wouldn't
affect sorting), and then when the dates are displayed my format
string only includes date info...
Hi,
How do people tend to round date type fields when they don't need millisecond
precision?
Using just the straight "date" type leaves you with date/time info down to
milliseconds. What if you want to round that up to minutes, for example? Is
there a way to tell the "date" type to do that?
"stemmed and stopped" is short for using a stemmer and removing stopwords.
Specifically, StopFilterFactory and EnglishPorterFilterFactory are
in the analysis chain.
wunder
On 8/27/08 10:26 PM, "Jake Conk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Walter,
>
> What do you mean by when you stemmed and stopp
>On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Kolodziej Christian
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm quite new in using solr but I managed to create some indexes and I
>wrote some nice working PHP classes for adding, inserting, querying and
>deleting records. But when I perform a search there have been some c
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Kolodziej Christian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm quite new in using solr but I managed to create some indexes and I wrote
> some nice working PHP classes for adding, inserting, querying and deleting
> records. But when I perform a search there have been some
Hello everyone,
I'm quite new in using solr but I managed to create some indexes and I wrote
some nice working PHP classes for adding, inserting, querying and deleting
records. But when I perform a search there have been some crazy phenomenons. If
a word is searched exactly in the right spellin
Yes, I am aware of and using SolrJ and EmbeddedSolrServer.
I want to use multiple Solr indices and I was doing it by creating multiple
instances of EmbeddedSolrServer. For each EmbeddedSolrServer, I was creating a
new SolrCore by creating new IndexSchema and SolrConfig objects. It was
workin
Thanks again, this should solve the current problem I am having.
Nikhil
- Original Message
From: Henrib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 28 August, 2008 7:42:11 PM
Subject: Re: CoreDescriptor explanation and possible bug
Nikhil Chhaochharia wrote:
You don't need two schemas. Have a field "type" with values
"job_post" and "job_profile", then filter based on type:job_post
and type:job_profile.
wunder
On 8/28/08 4:57 AM, "Norberto Meijome" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:01:05 -0700 (PDT)
> sanraj25 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
Nikhil Chhaochharia wrote:
>
>
> I am assuming that these are part of some patch which will get applied
> before 1.3 releases, is that correct ?
>
> Nikhil
>
>
Yes, this is part of a patch and no, they most likely will not make it in
1.3.
However, I guess the following will bring you even c
Thanks Henri, this is the kind of snippet I was looking for.
However, the CoreDescriptor constructor and method used below are not present
in the codebase.
CoreDescriptor dcore = new
CoreDescriptor("",solrConfig.getResourceLoader().getInstanceDir());
dcore.setCoreContainer(container);
I am assu
Seems you want something like:
public SolrCore nikhilInit(final IndexSchema indexSchema) {
final String solrConfigFilename = "solrconfig.xml"; // or else
CoreContainer.Initializer init = new CoreContainer.Initializer() {
@Override
public CoreContainer initialize() {
Co
Hi Nikhil,
Can you please describe your use-case? Are you aware of EmbeddedSolrServer?
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solrj
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 6:12 PM, Nikhil Chhaochharia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> I went through the javadocs for the CoreContainer and CoreDescriptor
> classes (20th-Aug nigh
Hi,
You can do with one index only. Add a flag field to the schema which flags
whether the data is a post or a profile. You can then use filter queries on
the flag field to limit results from either post or profile.
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 2:31 PM, sanraj25 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
I went through the javadocs for the CoreContainer and CoreDescriptor classes
(20th-Aug nightly, the latest I could find). The steps for creating a SolrCore
now appear to be: (Note for the benefit of those who might stumble upon this
through a websearch - this is not a HOWTO but my best guess w
Hi,
It is likely to be related to how you initialize Solr & create your
SolrCore; there has been a few changes to ensure there is always a
CoreContainer created which (as its name stands), holds a reference to all
created SolrCore.
There is a CoreContainer.Initializer class that allows to easily c
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:01:05 -0700 (PDT)
sanraj25 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to index two different files in solr.(for ex) I want to store
> two tables like, job_post and job_profile in solr. But now both are stored
> in same place in solr.when i get data from job_post, data come from
>
>In order to do this, you can't use the ShingleFilter during indexing
>since a document like "one two three" and a query like "one two four"
>will match since they have the shingle "one two" in common.
Hello Svein, nice to meet you in this place =)
I have been trying with and without
and also
Hi,
I have been using nightly builds of Solr 1.3 with SolrJ for some time now. I
upgraded the Solr jars from the 14-Aug nightly and my program would not
compile. I found that SolrCore constructor needed a new parameter
CoreDescriptor. I passed null and it worked fine.
I then upgraded to the
> The screenshot didn't make it (some attachments gets stripped)
I have put the screenshots here:
http://www.glennerik.com/solr/solrshingle1.gif
and here:
http://www.glennerik.com/solr/solrshingle2.gif
I also put the schema.xml here:
http://www.glennerik.com/solr/schema.xml
> This sounds very
Hi
I want to index two different files in solr.(for ex) I want to store
two tables like, job_post and job_profile in solr. But now both are stored
in same place in solr.when i get data from job_post, data come from
job_profile also.So i want to maintain the data of job_post and job_profile
That does the trick! Thanks for the quick reply (and for a great Solr
product!)
Bye,
Jaco.
2008/8/27 Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Instead of solr.TestStemFilterFactory, put the fully qualified classname
> for the TestStemFilterFactory, i.e.
> com.my.great.stemmer.TestStemFilterFactory.
45 matches
Mail list logo
