Re: Search with Date field

Can you reply with example of solr request? Amit On Mar 3, 2009, at 11:08 PM, dabboo wrote: Hi, Date search is not happening in solr. I am giving the field name and date value as the request but it is not returning any value. Please suggest. Thanks, Amit Garg -- View this message in co

Search with Date field

Hi, Date search is not happening in solr. I am giving the field name and date value as the request but it is not returning any value. Please suggest. Thanks, Amit Garg -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Search-with-Date-field-tp22324779p22324779.html Sent from the Solr - U

Re: Field Boosting with q.alt parameter Query

Hi Eric, Thanks for all the inputs you have given. They are really helpful. I am able to achieve the field boosting * wildcard with dismax. For this, I had to make code changes in DisjunctionMaxQueryParser sub class in SolrPluginUtils class. Thanks, Amit Garg Erik Hatcher wrote: > > Amit, > >

Re: Can find solr jars in WEB-INF/lib directory

Thanks for the DirectSolrConnection tip, that eliminated the need for parsing the XML as a string, and all that code need to instantiate a container. I am now Using SolrCore.getSolrCore(). This method is deprecated though, what is the standard way of instaniating a SoreCore to pass it as a paramet

Re: convert Nutch index to Solr

I don't think there is a way, other than manually reading Nutch's (Hadoop's) files and reindexing the content with Solr. But you should probably be using Nutch's support for Solr instead. Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message > From:

Re: Shard Query Problem

Anshul: It doesn't look like you ever got an answer to this question, did you ever find a solution? I'm not very shard savy, but if the numFound is coming back non-zero, the best guess i have is that somewhere you are overridding the default "rows" param with a value of 0. if that's not it: c

Re: DataImportHandler and delta-import question

I do not see anything wrong with this .It should have worked . Can you check that dataimport.properties is created (by DIH) in the conf directory? . check the content? are you sure that the query select DId from 2_Doc where ModifiedDate > '${dataimporter.last_index_time}' works with a date for

convert Nutch index to Solr

Hi, I am using Nutch nightly build #736 (version 1.0?) to crawl and index, and I would like to use Solr as the indexer. I wonder if there's a way to convert Nutch indices to Solr? Thanks! Tony -- Are you RCholic? www.RCholic.com 温 良 恭 俭 让 仁 义 礼 智 信

Indexing issue

Hi,   I have two cores in different machines which are referring to the same data directory. I have implemented this mechanism to have fault tolerance in place, if any of the machines are down the fault tolerance take care to index data from other machine.   Since two cores are referring to the

Re: Spatial search using R-tree for indexed bounding boxes

Are there any easily foreseeable problems with implementing an r- tree box indexing/searching extension to Solr, in the spirit of localsolr? If anyone has any pointers I'm all ears. I have implemented an R-Tree based integration for solr. It is pretty ugly and memory intensive, but works

DataImportHandler and delta-import question

I'm using solr 1.3 and am trying to get a delta-import with the DIH. Recently the wiki, http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler, was updated explaining that delta import is a 1.4 feature now but it was still possible get a delta using the full import example here, http://wiki.apache.org/solr/

Using large numbers of weighted tags to compare documents

I have a question regarding using large number of weighted tags in order to compare documents using Solr. Basically, I have a set of domain objects, each of which has many properties, and from these I'm creating documents which are added to Solr. The properties are all being turned into tags, s

Spatial search using R-tree for indexed bounding boxes

Hi list We're in need of a spatial search extension to Solr, and it looks like we might end up implementing it ourselves. At first glance localsolr looked promising, but a closer look revealed that each document has only a single point location, and querying is done via a cartesian grid. Our docu

Re: Very long commit time.

Looks like cache autowarming. If you have statically defined warming queries in solrconfig.xml, you could try setting autowarmCount=0 for all the caches. -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Jérôme Etévé wrote: > Dear solr fans, > >  I have a solr index of roug

Very long commit time.

Dear solr fans, I have a solr index of roughly 8M docs and I have here a little problem when I commit some insertion into it. The insert itself is very fast, but my commit takes 163 seconds. Here's the solr trace the commit leaves: INFO: start commit(optimize=false,waitFlush=false,waitS

Re: org.apache.lucene.analysis.tokenattributes package

Those are in the Lucene core JAR. On Feb 25, 2009, at 11:46 PM, dabboo wrote: Hi, I am trying to override getFieldQuery method of QueryParser class, which uses 2 classed i.e. PositionIncrementAttribute & TokenAttribute of org.apache.lucene.analysis.tokenattributes package. I\ I am not able

Re: How to use spell checker

See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent On Mar 3, 2009, at 1:23 AM, dabboo wrote: Hi, I am trying to implement the spell check feature in solr with lucene. for e.g. if any record contains "elephants" and user enters "elepents", even then also, it should return the results wi

Re: solr and tomcat

I see where your problems come in then. I'm not sure of the answer though =\ We've not had issues running multiple tomcat instances per server. I think at one point a few weeks ago we ran 6 instances per server, on quad core Xeon servers with 16gb of ram. Our use case might be different t

datadir issue for multicore on latest trunk

there is a strange behavior which seems to affect hudson today (March 3rd) build but not (for example) hudson February 2th build. Basically when I start the multicore enviroment, it just create datadir in the current path. To replicate: 1. download latest trunk 2. go to example directory $ ls READ

Re: solr and tomcat

That's exactly what we're doing (setting the value in each config). The main problem with that is we have multiple people working on each of these solr projects, in different environments. Their data.dir path is always the same (relative) value which works fine under Jetty. But running under tomcat

Re: solr and tomcat

Perhaps you could hard code it in the solrconfig.xml file for each solr instance? Other than that, what we did was run multiple instances of Tomcat. That way if something goes bad in one, it doesn't affect the others. Thanks for your time! Matthew Runo Software Engineer, Zappos.com mr...@z

Re: solr and tomcat

Hi Matthew, The problem is that we have multiple instances of solr running under one tomcat. So setting -Dsolr.data.dir=foo would set the home for every solr. I guess multi-core might solve my problem, but that'd change our app architecture too much, maybe some other day. I *kind* of have a solut

Re: solr and tomcat

It looks like if you set a -Dsolr.data.dir=foo then you could specify where the index would be stored, yes? Are you properly setting your solr.home? I've never had to set the data directory specifically, Solr has always put it under my home. From solrconfig.xml: ${solr.data.dir:./solr/dat

Phrases in Synonyms.txt

I have a thesaurus that I would like to dump into the synonyms.txt In my thesaurus I have a term swine that has a property called use_for which in my case is essentially a synonym. The json representation of the term swine from my solr based thesaurus is: { "term":"swine", "us

Re: Field Boosting with q.alt parameter Query

Amit, If you use the lucene query parser, you only get a q parameter. All the other parameters, such as qf and bq, are specific to the dismax query parser. If you want to use the lucene query parser for wildcard capability, you have to manually build the query across multiple fields and

Re: Phrase Query

On Mar 3, 2009, at 8:13 AM, dabboo wrote: I want to search "tes*t", where "*" is not considering as wildcard but as character. So, I am expecting the results which have tes*t as string as one of their field value. Please suggest how to achieve it. This requires escaping the special charac

Possible bug in spellchecker result

L.S. There seems to be a bug in the PHPS outputHandler when retrieving a query that also produces spellcheck results. The following query fails to return an unserializable string: spellcheck=true&facet=true&indent=on&facet.mincount=1&spellcheck.extendedResults=true& spellcheck.q=groninen&spellc

Phrase Query

Hi, I want to search "tes*t", where "*" is not considering as wildcard but as character. So, I am expecting the results which have tes*t as string as one of their field value. Please suggest how to achieve it. Thanks, Amit Garg -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Phrase-Que

Re: Field Boosting with q.alt parameter Query

Hi, I tried this url but it threw nullpointer exception. Also, I am having underscores in the field name like ProductUrl_s etc. I also debug the query which gets formed with q.alt, it doesnt calculate the scores of the documents and hence doesnt support field boosting. Please suggest me as how I

Re: javax.xml.stream.XMLStreamException while posting

Thanks it did work with the standard woodstox parser in the resin configuration file. Regards, Pooja On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Walter Underwood wrote: > Also, open your document in a browser to make sure that it really is > well-formed. Most browsers will pinpoint the syntax error. --wunde

Re: Difference between q and q.alt parameter query

Hi Eric, Thanks a lot for the information. How I can add the clauses for boosting like bq. I have field names like "prodMainTitle_s" etc. Do you mean that I should add the field boosting in bq entry in solrConfig file. Please suggest. Thanks, Amit Garg Erik Hatcher wrote: > > The dismax par

Re: Field Boosting with q.alt parameter Query

On Mar 3, 2009, at 3:35 AM, dabboo wrote: Is there any way, we can implement field boosting with q.alt parameter query. I would appreciate if somebody can suggest if there is any workaround for the same. The question really is not about q.alt specifically, but about query parsers. With t

Re: Can find solr jars in WEB-INF/lib directory

On Mar 3, 2009, at 3:01 AM, The Flight Captain wrote: I am wrapping CoreContainer in my own class (FacetServerImpl), so that I can override the query(SolrRequest request) method to return an xml String. This is the best way I found to get an xml response from Solr, without deploying solr a

Re: Difference between q and q.alt parameter query

The dismax parser does not support wildcard queries currently (but see also SOLR-756). Again, use defType=lucene to get that capability. But, you will lose the qf field specific boosting capability. You can, however, OR in additional clauses for boosting (like the dismax bq does). Quer

Field Boosting with q.alt parameter Query

Hi, Is there any way, we can implement field boosting with q.alt parameter query. I would appreciate if somebody can suggest if there is any workaround for the same. Thanks, Amit Garg -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Field-Boosting-with-q.alt-parameter-Query-tp22304491p22

Can find solr jars in WEB-INF/lib directory

I am wrapping CoreContainer in my own class (FacetServerImpl), so that I can override the query(SolrRequest request) method to return an xml String. This is the best way I found to get an xml response from Solr, without deploying solr as a service, note that EmbeddedSolrServer returns a NamedList.