which version of Solr are you using?
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Radha C. wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am trying to index documents by using solrj client. I have written a
> simple code below,
>
> {
>CommonsHttpSolrServer server = new
> CommonsHttpSolrServer("http://localhost:8080/s
Hi All,
I am trying to index documents by using solrj client. I have written a
simple code below,
{
CommonsHttpSolrServer server = new
CommonsHttpSolrServer("http://localhost:8080/solr/update";);
SolrInputDocument doc1=new SolrInputDocument();
d
Hi Noble Paul,
I am a beginner in solr pls don't mistake me if I am wrong,
Multicore in the sense using Database and HTTPdatasource(like web site or
rss feed) or any other combination of datasources to get data, is it right?
If yes then I am not trying to do it.
I am only tying to configure the H
Grant,
I am messing with the script, and with your tip I expect I can
make it recurse over as many releases as needed.
I did run it again using the full file, this time using my Imac:-
643465took 22min 14sec 2008-04-01
734796 73min 58sec 2009-
do you really need a multicore configuration?
start with a single core first.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Udaya wrote:
>
>
> Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Udaya wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> 3. The solr configuration xml files are placed inside the directory
>>>
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Udaya wrote:
>
>>
>> 3. The solr configuration xml files are placed inside the directory
>> structure
>> C:\web1\solr1\test\DIH\conf.
>> 5.I have set the java option in tomcat configuration as
>> -Dsolr.solr.home=C:\web1\s
which version of Solr are you using? if you are using one from trunk ,
you can pass the dataDir as an extra parameter?
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 7:41 AM, vivek sar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to set up cores dynamically. I want to use the same
> schema.xml and solrconfig.xml for all the created cor
iterestingly
seems to work
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Fergus McMenemie wrote:
> Hmmm, I am sure I have seen this as well!
>
> sourceColName="fileAbsolutePath"/>
>
> I get the #${x.imgvurl} added twice.
>
> Fergus.
>
>>On 3/31/09 11:50 AM, "Wesley Small" wrote:
>>
>>> I am trying to f
use TemplateTransformer
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Wesley Small wrote:
> I am trying to find a clean way to *hardcode* a field/column to a specific
> value during the DIH process. It does seems to be possible but I am getting
> an slightly invalid constant value in my index.
>
> replac
Let me start with 4)
Have you tried simply using multiple threads to send your docs to a single Solr
instance/core? You should get about the same performance as what you are
trying with your approach below, but without the headache of managing multiple
cores and index merging (not yet possible
Vivek,
No need for any RAMBuffer stuff, just use the appropriate ramBufferSizeMB value
in solrconfig.xml. This will only help with indexing, though!
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: vivek sar
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache
Hi,
The $SOLR_URL/solr/biblio/ looks suspicious. Should that be $SOLR_URL/solr/ ?
Also note that you are using the old SpellCheck RequestHandler, and we not have
a SpellCheckComponent - http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr -
Hi,
I'm trying to set up cores dynamically. I want to use the same
schema.xml and solrconfig.xml for all the created cores, so plan to
pass the same instance directory, but different dir directory. Here is
what I got in solr.xml by default (I didn't want define any core here,
but looks like we h
2009/3/31 Erik Hatcher :
>
> On Mar 31, 2009, at 2:13 PM, Development Team wrote:
>>
>> On the Lucene query parser syntax page (
>> http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_4_0/queryparsersyntax.html) linked to from
>> the Solr query syntax page, they mention:
>> "If you are programmatically generating a qu
assuming you really have a great reason for not using SolrJ, searching for
"missing content stream" would probably have lead you to discover that you
need to specify a Content-Type when POSTing to Solr so it understands your
request. (we could probably make the error message better, but for no
Hi,
I am new to Solr and am having an issue with the following
SingleInstanceLock: write.lock. We have solr 1.3 running under tomcat
1.6.0_11. We have an index of users that are online at any given time
(Usually around 4000 users). The records from solr are deleted and
repopulated at around
On Mar 31, 2009, at 2:13 PM, Development Team wrote:
On the Lucene query parser syntax page (
http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_4_0/queryparsersyntax.html) linked
to from
the Solr query syntax page, they mention:
"If you are programmatically generating a query string and then
parsing it
with
Hi list,
I've been working the last couple days on some synonym functionality and
I've been reading about the limitations regarding query-time multi-word
synonyms. All recommended solutions that I've come across so far suggest
using the SynonymFilter at index time rather than at query time.
Unfor
Walter,
Thanks for clarifying my mistake there.
I wouldn't want to send someone down the wrong path.
Thanks
Vernon
On 3/31/09 4:17 PM, "Walter Underwood" wrote:
> It looks like you are using synonyms at query time. Don't do that, it
> works very strangely. Only use them at index time. That do
It's okay to not use the SynonymFilter for querying and for indexing. In
fact, you would really only want to use one or the other: either index all
synonyms, or query for them, but not both.
I have read that there are issues with multi-word synonyms and my guess is
that this is where your problem
It looks like you are using synonyms at query time. Don't do that, it
works very strangely. Only use them at index time. That does the right
matching and also gives the right idf for scoring.
More details are here:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#head-2c461ac74b4
ddd82
This is a known limitation of using the SynonymFilter and expanding to
variants of different sizes at query time. See the notes for
SynonymFilterFactory here:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#head-2c461ac74b4ddd82e453dc68fcfc92da77358d46
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimaginat
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Fergus McMenemie wrote:
> Hmmm, I am sure I have seen this as well!
>
> sourceColName="fileAbsolutePath"/>
>
> I get the #${x.imgvurl} added twice.
>
Indeed. I wrote the following test:
Pattern p = Pattern.compile("(.*)");
Matcher m = p.matcher("xyz");
Assert.
Leonardo,
The only other thing I can think of is check the
Field type in the schema.xml file make sure that you are using the same
filters.
For example if in your index analyzer you use the solr.SynonymFilterFactory
filter make sure your query analyzer also uses the same filter class.
Other than
Hi, Vernon!
We tried both approaches: OR and AND. In both cases, the results were
smaller when the synonyms was set up, with no change at all when it
comes to synonyms.
Any other ideas? Is it likely to be a bug?
Best,
Leonardo
Vernon Chapman escreveu:
Leonardo,
I am no expert but I wou
Leonardo,
I am no expert but I would check to make sure that the
DefaultOperator parameter in your schema.xml file is set to
OR rather thank AND.
Vernon
On 3/31/09 3:24 PM, "Leonardo Dias" wrote:
> Hello there. How are you guys?
>
> We're having problems with synonyms here and I thought that
Hello there. How are you guys?
We're having problems with synonyms here and I thought that maybe you
guys could help us on how SOLR works for synonyms.
The problem is the following: I'd like to setup a synonym like "dba,
database administrator".
Instead of increasing the number of results f
Hmmm, I am sure I have seen this as well!
I get the #${x.imgvurl} added twice.
Fergus.
>On 3/31/09 11:50 AM, "Wesley Small" wrote:
>
>> I am trying to find a clean way to *hardcode* a field/column to a specific
>> value during the DIH process. It does seems to be possible but I am getting
>
Hi everybody, after reading the documentation on the Solr site, I have the
following newbie-ish question:
On the Lucene query parser syntax page (
http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_4_0/queryparsersyntax.html) linked to from
the Solr query syntax page, they mention:
"If you are programmatically gener
Hi,
As part of speeding up the index process I'm thinking of spawning
multiple threads which will write to different temporary SolrCores.
Once the index process is done I want to merge all the indexes in
temporary cores to a master core. For ex., if I want one SolrCore per
day then every index c
Thanks Noble Paul for the valuable tip. A servlet filter sounds like a great
solution here.
>-Original Message-
>From: Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् [mailto:noble.p...@gmail.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 1:29 AM
>To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Hijacking Search Requests
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Wesley Small wrote:
> I am trying to find a clean way to *hardcode* a field/column to a specific
> value during the DIH process. It does seems to be possible but I am
> getting
> an slightly invalid constant value in my index.
>
> replaceWith="Video" />
>
> Howev
Wesley,
I'm not sure but if what you want is to have Video in the field I would do
something in the sql query.
I use postgres and I needed all my calendar event items to have "event" in
the field named content. So I used the following as my sql query:
select *,'event' as content from events
Tha
If you're using the GET interface, add the "rows" parameter to your URL. See
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters
See also the "start" parameter.
2009/3/31 Sajith Weerakoon :
> Hello all,
>
>
>
> I am writing an application using solr and I am having a problem in
> increasing the nu
I am trying to find a clean way to *hardcode* a field/column to a specific
value during the DIH process. It does seems to be possible but I am getting
an slightly invalid constant value in my index.
However, the value in the index was set to "VideoVideo" for all documents.
Any idea why this DI
sunnyfr wrote:
Hi,
How can I be sure about that my IndexReaders are in read-only mode?
Thanks a lot ,
I think the feature was introduced in Solr 1.3.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-730
Or you can see CHANGES.txt...
Koji
Hi,
There are 4 different sets of indices - 2 of which have a similar schema and
the other 2 have completely different schemas.
The intent would be to use a combination of a federated & distributed search
if possible. The initial user query - is only for data from a distributed
search. Ideally
Hi,
Is it possible to configure/index separate set of tables with one solr
core.( groupA- 6 related tables and groupB - 8 related tables and group A&B
are unrelated ) ?
Is it so, how to include/index the table's unique keys in the schema.xml?
Can anyone please provide me any documentation link.
Thanks much
-Original Message-
From: Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् [mailto:noble.p...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:22 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; cra...@ceiindia.com
Subject: Re: Transformers in dataconfig xml
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DIHCustomTransformer
On Tue,
Thanks, We have tons of records with CLOB fields.
_
From: Shalin Shekhar Mangar [mailto:shalinman...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:21 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; cra...@ceiindia.com
Subject: Re: indexed fields vs stored fields
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Radha
Can you try adding &overwrite=false and running against the latest
version? My current working theory is that Solr/Lucene has changed
how deletes are handled such that work that was deferred before is now
not deferred as often. In fact, you are not seeing this cost paid (or
at least not n
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Udaya wrote:
>
> 3. The solr configuration xml files are placed inside the directory
> structure
> C:\web1\solr1\test\DIH\conf.
> 5.I have set the java option in tomcat configuration as
> -Dsolr.solr.home=C:\web1\solr1\test(It is here that the solr.xml and D
Would [a TO bzzz] work?
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:30 AM, dabboo wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am searching for all the records in the index where author's last name
> > starts with a or b. I am givin
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 2:18 PM, tushar kapoor <
tushar_kapoor...@rediffmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have indexes with a multivalued field authorLastName. I query them with
> sort=authorLastName asc and get the results as -
>
> Index# authorLastName
> 1 Antonakos
> 2 Keller
> 3
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DIHCustomTransformer
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Radha C. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any documentation available for usage of transformers in
> dataimport. If so can anyone tell me the url ?
>
> Thanks
>
--
--Noble Paul
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Radha C. wrote:
>
> Suppose If I have an large field and I am not storing the field in solr due
> to performance factor, How can I handle this field or How can I get the
> value of the field through search ? How to store large fields outside of
> Solr?
You'd pro
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:30 AM, dabboo wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am searching for all the records in the index where author's last name
> starts with a or b. I am giving my query like
>
> au_last_name:[a* TO b*]
>
> But it is returning all the other records where last name starts with E, P
> or othe
Hi,
How can I be sure about that my IndexReaders are in read-only mode?
Thanks a lot ,
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/solr-1.4-IndexReaders-are-in-read-only-mode-tp22804955p22804955.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
Is there any documentation available for usage of transformers in
dataimport. If so can anyone tell me the url ?
Thanks
I am a new bee to Solr and till date my experience with Solr is great.
1. I am trying to use Solr v1.3 in a web application which is deployed
into Tomcatv6.0. I am
doing this with reference to the example-DIH thats provided with the solr
download.
2. The web application(with name TestSolr) h
svn co -r REV_NUM https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/trunk
solr-REV_NUM
-Grant
On Mar 30, 2009, at 4:55 PM, Fergus McMenemie wrote:
Can you verify that rev 701485 still performs reasonably well? This
is from October 2008 and I get similar results to the earlier rev.
Am now tryin
Thanks Paul,
So I set stored=false to a field in schema.xml, and I tried to search that
field value. It is identified properly and getting the number of response with
empty document values. This is how it works. But What if I want that field
value which is not stored in solr?
Suppose If I h
indexed = can be searched (mean you can use this to query). This
undergoes tokenization filter etc
stored = can be retrieved . No modification to the data. This is stored verbatim
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Radha C. wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> I know about indexing fields but little unclear a
Hello List,
I know about indexing fields but little unclear about the difference between
index field and stored field.
Can anyone explain me whta does mean by index and stored fields? and What
does mean by storing large fields outside of Solr (need to set store="false"
in schema.xml ) ?
Thanks
you can control the number of response documents from the query url
q=test&start=0&rows=20
And refer to the documentation provided in
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/tutorial.html#Getting+Started for any example
demo related questions.
-Original Message-
From: Sajith Weerakoon [mailto:saji.
Hello all,
I want to increase the number of results shown in the example jetty app for
more thn 10. Can some1 tell me how to configure the configuration file so
that we can get more results than this.
Thanks,
Regards,
Sajith Vimukthi Weerakoon.
Hello all,
I am writing an application using solr and I am having a problem in
increasing the number of results. Everytime I pass a search parameter I get
only 10 results. How can I increase the number of results?
Thanks,
Regards,
Sajith Vimukthi Weerakoon.
Thanks for your reply. Yes, I restarted the servlet container, and run my
java code to reindex again, I tested with analysis page also.
StandardFilterFactory is not removing dots in the L.I.C. Below is the
analyser output. Sohould I use WhiteSpaceTokenizerFactory with the
StandardFilterFactory ?
Hi,
I have indexes with a multivalued field authorLastName. I query them with
sort=authorLastName asc and get the results as -
Index# authorLastName
1 Antonakos
2 Keller
3 Antonakos
Mansfield
However Index#3 has a value starting with A
Did you try creating your indexes again after modifying the schema.xml
The way Solr search is, whatever string you have
Radha C. wrote:
>
>
> Thanks Grant,
>
> I used the analysis page in the example, the StandardTokenizerFactory does
> not split by dots, It is passing the L.I.C
> as it is
Thanks Grant,
I used the analysis page in the example, the StandardTokenizerFactory does
not split by dots, It is passing the L.I.C
as it is to solr.StandardFilterFactory and this Filter class also did not
split or remove the dots. My question is I read in the wiki page (
http://wiki.apache.org/
61 matches
Mail list logo
