Thanks guys,
I used pure java driver. That works.
-Original Message-
From: Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् [mailto:noble.p...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 8:59 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Error in Importing from Oracle
put your native dll/iso file in the LD_LI
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Praveen Kumar Jayaram
wrote:
>
>
> Thanks for the reply Noble Paul.
> In my application I will be having multiple types of object and the number
> of properties in each object will vary.
> So I have made them as FieldType and defined in schema.xml also
The POJO is
Thanks for the suggestion Otis.
This works.
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Try defining 2 separate fields and using copyField.
>
>
> Otis
> --
> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>> From: Praveen Kumar Jayaram
>> To: so
Thanks for the reply Noble Paul.
In my application I will be having multiple types of object and the number
of properties in each object will vary.
So I have made them as FieldType and defined in schema.xml also
How do I store the POJO without declaring it as a FieldType?
Solr needs to recogniz
yeah, ant dist will give you the .war file you may need . just drop it
in and you are set to go. or if you can hook up a debugger to a
running Solr that is the easiest
--Noble
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 9:35 AM, ashokc wrote:
>
> That would require me to recompile (with ant/maven scripts?) the source
I've got a problem that's driving me crazy with parentheses.
I'm using a recent nightly Solr 1.4
My index includes these three docs.
doc #1 has title: "saints & sinners"
doc #2 has title: "(saints and sinners)"
doc #3 has title: "( saints & sinners )"
doc #4 has title: "(saints & si
That would require me to recompile (with ant/maven scripts?) the source and
replace the jar for DIH, right? I can try - for the first time.
- ashok
Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote:
>
> This looks strange. Apparently the Transformer did not get applied. Is
> it possible for you to debug ClobTran
This looks strange. Apparently the Transformer did not get applied. Is
it possible for you to debug ClobTransformer adding(System.out.println
into ClobTransformer may help)
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 6:04 AM, ashokc wrote:
>
> Correcting my earlier post. It lost some lines some how.
>
> Hi,
>
> I hav
put your native dll/iso file in the LD_LIBRARY_PATH and start Solr
with that. Or the best solution is to use a pure java driver
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Radha C. wrote:
>> Hello List,
>>
>> I am trying to do full import from
Correcting my earlier post. It lost some lines some how.
Hi,
I have set up to import some oracle clob columns with DIH. I am using the
latest nightly release. My config says,
But it does not seem to turn this clob into a String. The search results
show:
1.8670129
oracle.s
Hi,
I have set up to import some oracle clob columns with DIH. I am using the
latest nightly release. My config says,
But it does not seem to turn this clob into a String. The search results
show:
1.8670129
oracle.sql.c...@aed3a5
4486
Any pointers on why I do not get t
Fastest way I know of to get the schema is using the luke browser.
http://localhost/solr/admin/luke
It returns in xml and has tons of info you probably aren't interested it.
However, it does contain information like fields and type.
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.co
Thanks Noble. That helped - turned out there was field name mismatch in my bean.
2009/4/1 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् :
> The classcast exception is misleading. It happens because the response
> itself was some error response.
>
> debug it by setting the XmlResponseParser
> http://wiki.apache.org/s
) If I want to search for a word in all the cores.
3) How would I search on multiple cores on multiple machines?
Single core I'm able to search like,
http://localhost:8080/solr/20090402/select?q=*:*
Thanks,
-vivek
--
Just in case if this might be helpful to others who mig
Found the issue. This was old code that I finally got around to enabling.
Somebody put a slash at the end of my XML element.
From: Yonik Seeley
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2009 2:32:37 PM
Subject: Re: newSearcher doesn't fire
I ju
I just tried with the standard example in solr trunk... seems like
it's still working fine when I issue a commit:
Apr 2, 2009 5:30:19 PM org.apache.solr.core.QuerySenderListener newSearcher
INFO: QuerySenderListener sending requests to searc...@1702c48 main
Apr 2, 2009 5:30:19 PM org.apache.solr.c
Hi:
I want to get a list of the fields and field types for an index deployed on a
Solr server (over HTTP or embedded). I can't see any obvious way to do this as
a client.
This is part of the use case for an app we are working on where all field
information for an index is available and we can
I am trying to figure this out. I have a firstSearcher and a newSearcher event.
They are almost identical. Upon startup, I see all the firstSearcher events in
my log. I also see log events for Added SolrEventListener for both
firstSearcher and newSearcher.
Next, I push out a new index. I see th
Sure, given that the default operator is OR you'd expect it to widen as you
add more terms.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:57 PM, muness wrote:
>
> Laurent,
>
> My bad, I should have used the exact query results I was getting, rather
> than a made up example. Here are those results:
>
> $ curl ht
Laurent,
My bad, I should have used the exact query results I was getting, rather
than a made up example. Here are those results:
$ curl http://localhost:8982/solr/select/?q=otto --silent | xmlstarlet fo |
grep numFound
$ curl http://localhost:8982/solr/select/?q=otto%20added --silent |
xmls
Hi,
I typically issue a facetdrill down query thus
q=somequery and Facetfield:facetval .
Is there any issues with the above approach as opposed to
&fq=facetfield:value in terms of memory consumption and the use of cache.
Regards
Suajatha
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Jarek Zgoda wrote:
> I'm testing solr-nightly (2009-04-02) and I noticed very long instance
> startup time compared to 1.3 (4 minutes to 20 seconds). The machine is
> pretty common 2 core AMD64 with 4GB RAM.
>
> Is this normal or should I be worried?
Definitely not
Are the queries only returning 10 results? (in the result element ->
)
By default, I believe Solr will only return the first ten results it
finds which may explain the results.
-Original Message-
From:
solr-user-return-20409-laurent.vauthrin=disney@lucene.apache.org
[mailto:solr-user-
When search through solr, a user noticed some unintuitive results to a query.
I am having trouble figuring out if this is the expected result or not.
Here's an example:
* Using the query "otto" returns 10 results
* Using the query "otto added" returns 10 results
The weird part is that the res
Hi all,
I am brand new with Solr and i have a pretty big problem to solve.
I need to index some e-mails (from Dovecot) and their attachments. The
index's structure i was thinking is:
Note: Only the last 2 fields are relevant to this problem.
W
Hi,
Try defining 2 separate fields and using copyField.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Praveen Kumar Jayaram
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2009 2:02:55 AM
> Subject: How do I combine Whites
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Radha C. wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> I am trying to do full import from remote oracle server. I am getting the
> below error,
>
> Can anyone please help me what configuration I am missing? Thanks in
> advance.
>
> Apr 2, 2009 6:46:39 PM org.apache.solr.handler.dataimp
Sorry, I just realized I can use SolrIndexSearcher.search(Query, Hit)...
that was my question basically.
paul
Le 02-avr.-09 à 03:31, Erik Hatcher a écrit :
Paul,
I'm not sure I understand what you're looking for exactly. Solr
supports Lucene's QueryParser by default for /select?q=... so
On Apr 2, 2009, at 9:23 AM, Fergus McMenemie wrote:
Grant,
I should note, however, that the speed difference you are seeing may
not be as pronounced as it appears. If I recall during ApacheCon, I
commented on how long it takes to shutdown your Solr instance when
exiting it. That time it t
Hello List,
I am trying to do full import from remote oracle server. I am getting the
below error,
Can anyone please help me what configuration I am missing? Thanks in
advance.
Apr 2, 2009 6:46:39 PM org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImporter
doFullImport
SEVERE: Full Import failed
org
On Apr 2, 2009, at 8:47 AM, Akshay wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Neha Bhardwaj <
neha_bhard...@persistent.co.in> wrote:
Hi,
I want to index through commond line
How to do that?
You can use curl,
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateXmlMessages?highlight=%28curl%29#head-c614ba822059ae
Grant,
>I should note, however, that the speed difference you are seeing may
>not be as pronounced as it appears. If I recall during ApacheCon, I
>commented on how long it takes to shutdown your Solr instance when
>exiting it. That time it takes is in fact Solr doing the work that
>was
This is my conf :
http://www.nabble.com/file/p22847570/solrconfig.xml solrconfig.xml
And this is my delta import:
*/20 * * * * /usr/bin/wget -q --output-document=/home/video_import.txt
http:/master.com:8180/solr/video/dataimport?command=delta-import&optimize=false
--
View this message in c
I don't optimize at all.
my delta-import&optimize=false
I didn't turnd on optimize, I think it merges segment alone, because size
increase too quickly?
Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote:
>
> it is not a good idea to optimize the index everytime you commit. That
> is why your downloads are takin
it is not a good idea to optimize the index everytime you commit. That
is why your downloads are taking so long
2009/4/2 Johanna Mortemousque :
> I've so many update, almost 2 000 every 20mn, that lucene merge my index
> folder,
> so everytime my slave replicate its a new index folder merged so ev
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Neha Bhardwaj <
neha_bhard...@persistent.co.in> wrote:
> Hi,
> I want to index through commond line
> How to do that?
You can use curl,
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateXmlMessages?highlight=%28curl%29#head-c614ba822059ae20dde5698290caeb851534c9de
>
>
>
> -
On Apr 2, 2009, at 4:02 AM, Fergus McMenemie wrote:
Grant,
Hmmm, the big difference is made by &overwrite=false. But,
can you explain why &overwrite=false makes such a difference.
I am starting off with an empty index and I have checked the
content there are no duplicates in the uniqueKey field
Hi,
I want to index through commond line
How to do that?
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:e...@ehatchersolutions.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 5:42 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: multicore
On Apr 2, 2009, at 6:32 AM, Neha Bhardwaj wrote:
> Also how
http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 5:47 PM, sunnyfr wrote:
>
> I think about the slave.
> When I start in multi thread 20 request second my cpu is very bad.
> I'm sure I don't manage properly my gc. I've 8G per slave it should be fine.
>
> I wonder, I shouldn't
I think about the slave.
When I start in multi thread 20 request second my cpu is very bad.
I'm sure I don't manage properly my gc. I've 8G per slave it should be fine.
I wonder, I shouldn't put 7G to xmx jvm, I don't know,
but slave is as well a little problem during replication from the master.
If you are looking at the QTime on the master it is likely to be
skewed by ReplicationHandler becaus ethe files are downloaded using a
request. On a slave it should not be a problem.
I guess we must not add the qtimes of ReplicationHandler
--Noble
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 5:34 PM, sunnyfr wrote:
>
On Apr 2, 2009, at 6:32 AM, Neha Bhardwaj wrote:
Also how to index data in particular core.
Say.. we have core0 and core1 in multicore.
How can I specify that on which core iwant to index data.
You index into http://loalhost:8983/solr/core0/update or
http://loalhost:8983/solr/core1/update
Hi,
Just applied replication by requestHandler.
And since this the Qtime went mad and can reach long time 9068
Without this replication Qtime can be around 1sec.
I've 14Mdocs stores for 11G. so not a lot of data stores.
I've servers with 8G and tomcat use 7G.
I'm updating every 30mn which is ab
why is the POJO extending FieldType?
it does not have to.
composite types are not supported.because Solr cannot support that.
But the field can be a List or array.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Praveen Kumar Jayaram
wrote:
>
> Could someone give suggestions for this issue?
>
>
> Praveen Kumar
Is there a way to achieve this requiremnt?
Please give your valuable comments.
Praveen Kumar Jayaram wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I am trying to use features of WhitespaceTokenizerFactory and
> EdgeNGramTokenizerFactory.
> My requirement is to search a String using substring and inword concepts.
Could someone give suggestions for this issue?
Praveen Kumar Jayaram wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I am trying to have a complex POJO type in Solr 1.3
> i.e Object inside object.
>
> Below is a sample Field created,
>
> public class TestType extends FieldType{
> @Field
> private String requestor
I'm testing solr-nightly (2009-04-02) and I noticed very long instance
startup time compared to 1.3 (4 minutes to 20 seconds). The machine is
pretty common 2 core AMD64 with 4GB RAM.
Is this normal or should I be worried?
--
We read Knuth so you don't have to. - Tim Peters
Jarek Zgoda, R&D,
Hello,
Sorry if this is a FAQ; I suspect it could be. But how do I work around the
following:-
INFO: [] webapp=/apache-solr-1.4-dev path=/update/extract
params={ext.def.fl=text&ext.literal.id=factbook/reference_maps/pdf/oceania.pdf}
status=0 QTime=318
Apr 2, 2009 11:17:46 AM org.apache.solr.c
Hi,
Thanks a lot ...
But still I am not very clear with creating multiple cores.
I read the document(wiki)but was not able to understand it properly.
Also how to index data in particular core.
Say.. we have core0 and core1 in multicore.
How can I specify that on which core iwant to index data.
Ki
Ok so It doesn't seems to work
after a replication, my first request on my slave is always very long and
next one very quick ???
do I have to set something else ?
solr 0 100
anything id
desc
fast_warm 0 100
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 2:13 PM, sunnyfr wrote:
>
> Hi Hoss,
>
> Do I need autowarming > 0 to have newSearcher and firstSearcher fired?
>
> Thanks a lot,
>
Did you mean autowarmCount > 0?
No, firstSearcher and newSearcher are always executed if specified.
The autowarmCount can be anything, it doe
On Apr 2, 2009, at 4:55 AM, Fergus McMenemie wrote:
Thanks. Copying all those jar files to my solr/lib directory was
the trick. But why do I have to do this; is it by design or
because ExtractingRequestHandler is yet to be fully incorporated
into Solr?
It's fully integrated into the example as
>On Apr 2, 2009, at 4:26 AM, Fergus McMenemie wrote:
>> I cant get ExtractingRequestHandler to work with tomcat. Using the
>> latest version from svn and then a "make clean dist" and copying the
>> war file to a clean tomcat does not work.
>
>make?! :)
Oops!
>
>try "ant example" to see if that ge
Hi Hoss,
Do I need autowarming > 0 to have newSearcher and firstSearcher fired?
Thanks a lot,
hossman wrote:
>
>
> : Subject: autowarm static queries
>
> A minor followup about terminology:
>
> "auto-warming" describes what Solr does when it opens a new cache, and
> seeds it with key/val
On Apr 2, 2009, at 4:26 AM, Fergus McMenemie wrote:
I cant get ExtractingRequestHandler to work with tomcat. Using the
latest version from svn and then a "make clean dist" and copying the
war file to a clean tomcat does not work.
make?! :)
try "ant example" to see if that gets it working - i
Hello all,
I cant get ExtractingRequestHandler to work with tomcat. Using the
latest version from svn and then a "make clean dist" and copying the
war file to a clean tomcat does not work.
Adding the following to solconfig.xml ands restarting tomcat i get
> class="org.apache.solr.handler.extr
>On Apr 1, 2009, at 9:39 AM, Fergus McMenemie wrote:
>
>> Grant,
>>
>> Redoing the work with your patch applied does not seem to
>
>>
>> make a difference! Is this the expected result?
>
>No, I didn't expect Solr 1095 to fix the problem. Overwrite = false +
>1095, does, however, AFAICT by your la
57 matches
Mail list logo
