You can actually define boost queries to do that (bq parameter). Boost
queries accept the standard Lucene query syntax and eventually appended
to the user query. Just make sure that the default operator is set to OR
other wise these boost queries will not only influence the boosts but
also
Hello,
Does anyone know of a way to tell an http SolrServer to reload its back-end
index (mark cache as dirty) periodically?
I have a scenario where an EmbeddedSolrServer is used for writing (for fast
indexing), and an
CommonsHttpSolrServer for reading (for remote access).
If the
And what about:
fieldtype name=sint class=solr.SortableIntField
sortMissingLast=true/
vs.
fieldtype name=bcdint class=solr.BCDIntField sortMissingLast=true/
Wich is the differenece between both? It's just bcdint always better?
Thanks in advance
Yonik Seeley-2 wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 7:02 AM, Marc Sturlese marc.sturl...@gmail.com wrote:
And what about:
fieldtype name=sint class=solr.SortableIntField
sortMissingLast=true/
vs.
fieldtype name=bcdint class=solr.BCDIntField sortMissingLast=true/
Wich is the differenece between both? It's just bcdint
Are you sure about the default operator and bq? I assume we're
talking about the setting in schema.xml.
I think boosting queries are OR'd in automatically to the main query:
From DismaxQParser#addBoostQuery()
... query.add(f, BooleanClause.Occur.SHOULD);...
There is one case where
Well.. this is mainly based on some experiments I did (not based on the
code base). It appeared as if the boost queries were appended to the
generated dismax query and if the default operator (in the schema) was
set to AND it actually filtered out the request. For example, here's a
dismax
Checking it further by looking at the code, it seems that in most cases
it indeed adds the boost queries as SHOULD. But if you define *one* bq
parameter which contains a boolean query, then each clause in this
boolean query will be added to the query as is. Therefore:
This set up will filter
Robin Wojciki wrote:
I am running a search in Solr 1.4 and I am getting the
StringIndexOutOfBoundsException pasted below. The spell check field
uses HTMLStripCharFilterFactory. However, the search works fine if I
do not use the HTMLStripCharFilterFactory.
If I set a breakpoint at
Is there any update on this requirement??
Britske wrote:
Is there way to exclude filters from a stats field, like it is possible to
exclude filters from a facet.field? It didn't work for me.
i.e: I have a field price, and although I filter on price, I would like to
be able to get the
Yonik Seeley wrote:
Is BaseCharFilter required for the html strip filter?
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
It could be if HTMLStripCharFilter is reverted to first version.
The first version of HTMLStripCharFilter, for example,
if we have paaa, it producesaaa (3 space chars prior
Hi Otis,
I think my experiments are not conclusive about reduction in search time. I
was playing around with various configurations to reduce the time to
retrieve documents from Solr. I am sure that making the two multi valued
text fields from stored to un-stored, retrieval time (query time + time
2 ways I can think of ...
- ExtractingRequestHandler (this is what I am guessing you are using now)
Set extractOnly=true while making a request to the extractingRequestHandler
and get the parsed content back. Now make a post request on update request
handler with what ever fields and field
On Dec 4, 2009, at 1:56 AM, brad anderson wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for a way to have the score of documents decay over time. I want
older documents to have a lower score than newer documents.
I noted the ReciprocalFloatFunction class. In an example it seemed to be
doing just this when you
Thanks a lot for you response !!
For the first solution :
I need to index all the content of my websites and I want just tika ignore
meta name=id because I have already an id
I'll try monday and tell you if it works
The second solution :
Are your sure Tika use the HTML Tokenizer ? I'll check
I've just found solr and am looking at what's involved to work with it. All
the examples I've seen only ever use 1 word search terms being implemented
as examples, which doesn't help me trying to see how multiple word queries
work. It also looks like a hell of a lot of processing needs to be done
15 matches
Mail list logo
