Hi all,
Solr newb here. I'm attempting to index some docs and then search for them
using the usual XML posts to send the document data to the app. The
documents seem to be indexing as the numDocs under statistics seems to
reflect the number of documents I've POSTed. However, through no medium a
I don't think there's a way to do this out of the box, but if there
were a SpanFirstQuery parser plugin, it could be used as a dismax
boosting query (bq) or as an optional _query_ expression.
Erik
On Mar 5, 2010, at 11:56 AM, Сергей Кашин wrote:
I have some documents in Solr index
I've seen similar errors happen if you delete the *contents* of our index
directory but not the directory itself.
Just to be sure, stop/restart your SOLR instance if you manually
delete your index.
But the error I've seen when doing the above usually doesn't
mention a specific character, so I'd g
Hello community,
I am not sure about what is the best way to handle the following problem:
I have got an index, let's say with 2mio documents, and there is a
check-field.
The check-field contains on boolean values (TRUE/FALSE).
What is the best way to query only documents with a TRUE check-value
Hi,
Users pls ignore this mail. I am just sending a test mail to check whether
my user id is okay.
The mails I am sending to this group is bouncing from yesterday.Pls excuse
me for any inconvenience.
Thanks and Rgds,
Mark
Hi,
I have a doubt regarding Index Merging:-
I have set up 2 cores COREX and COREY.
COREX - always serves user requests
COREY - gets updated with the latest values (dataDir is in a different
location from COREX)
I tried merging coreX and coreY at the end of COREY getting updated with the
latest d
At a guess, you're looking in the default field for the letter "i", which
has probably been removed at indexing time because it is a
stopword. Unless you specify a field (e.g. q=field:value), the search
goes against your default field (specified in schema).
Two very useful tools are :
the solr adm
H, Why isn't q helpful? You can specify field:value pairs
for a q clause. so you can pretty easily tack on an AND check:true.
I'd try that and measure performance before trying more complex
solutions
Or do I misunderstand the problem?
HTH
Erick
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 8:21 AM, MitchK wr
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:33 PM, Lance Norskog wrote:
> I have added facet.limit=5 to the above to make this easier. Here is
> the part of the response:
>
>
> -
>
> -
> -
> 0
> 0
> 0
> 0
> 0
> 2
>
>
>
>
>
> (What is the 2?)
That's what happens when you have a null name/key in
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 7:34 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> At a guess, you're looking in the default field for the letter "i", which
> has probably been removed at indexing time because it is a
> stopword. Unless you specify a field (e.g. q=field:value), the search
> goes against your default field (
Hi,
I am facing performance issue in SOLR when indexing huge data. Please find
below the stats,
8:57:17.334
42778
273725
42775
0
Indexing of 273725 rows is taking almost 9 hours. Please find below my Data
config file
At the 9+ hour mark, is your database server showing active connections
that are sending data, or is all the activity local to SOLR?
We have a 40 million row database in MySQL, with each row comprising
more than 80 fields. I'm including the config from one of our shards.
There are about 6.6
Yes, that's possible.
However I thought, that the normal-q-param forces Solr to lookup every
check-field whereas it is true or false.
So I am looking for something like a tree that devides the index into two
pieces - true and false.
So Solr do not need to lookup the check-field anymore, because
I have now learned more about the CachedSqlEntityProcessor, so in theory
it should be done with the server connections, but if it were me, I'd
verify that.
How big are the resultsets from those queries? SOLR has to put all the
table data into RAM, which is very likely going to take considerab
Shawn,
Thanks a lot for your response,
Yes, still the DB connection is active.. It is still fetching the data from
the DB.
I am using Redhat MetaMatrix DB as backend and I am trying to find out the
parameter for setting the JDBC fetch size..
Do you think that this problem will be mostly due t
I think the root of your problem is the string type of your default
field. That type is untokenized, so if you indexed
"my name is erick", the *only* thing that would match
is searching for exactly that. Searching for "erick" wouldn't
match, nor anything besides the exact and entire value
I su
Do keep looking into the batchSize, but I think I might have found the
issue. If I understand things correctly, you will need to add
processor="CachedSqlEntityProcessor" to your first entity. It's only
specified on the other two. Assuming you have enough RAM and heap space
available in your
Shawn,
Please find below the resulset size of each query,
select objectuid as uid, objectid, objecttype, objectname,
repositoryname,
a.lastupdateddate from MetaModel.POC.Object a,
MetaModel.POC.Repository b
where a.repositoryid = b.repositoryid ---> 30 rows ---> Query 1
select Objec
The last thing I'd do is partition my index into two, unless and
until I really *knew* I had speed problems. The added complexity
isn't worth it and your index isn't huge, so search speed can
probably be addressed without that complexity.
Filter queries are probably your first choice here. Memory
Erick,
your response was really helpfull - the problem is solved for the next time.
However, there are two questions:
Where do you know, that the bit-vector has a maximum size of 250k?
Did I overlook something (because I have got an index of 2.000.000
documents)?
Are there any theoretical docu
the 250K is an approximation, (total number of docs)/8. As in
one bit per document. Really, all a filter is is a bit-vector where
each bit represents whether the doc ID represented by that bit
should be included in the results or not. Technically, it's the
(largest doc id)/8 where (largest doc id)
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> I think the root of your problem is the string type of your default
> field. That type is untokenized, so if you indexed
> "my name is erick", the *only* thing that would match
> is searching for exactly that. Searching for "erick" wouldn't
Hi,
I have a ODBC driver with me for MetaMatrix DB(Redhat). I am trying to
figure out a way to use DIH using the DSN which has been created in my
machine with that ODBC driver?
Is it possible to spcify a DSN in DIH and index the DB? if its possible, can
you please let me know the ODBC URL that I
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Devin Austin wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Erick Erickson
> wrote:
>
>> I think the root of your problem is the string type of your default
>> field. That type is untokenized, so if you indexed
>> "my name is erick", the *only* thing that would mat
Did you reindex all your data and commit it afterward?
Erick
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Devin Austin wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Devin Austin
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Erick Erickson >wrote:
> >
> >> I think the root of your problem is the strin
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Did you reindex all your data and commit it afterward?
>
> Erick
>
> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Devin Austin
> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Devin Austin
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 12:13 PM,
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
> On 03/04/2010 05:56 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>>
>> : The ability to read solr configuration files from the classpath instead
>> of
>> : solr.solr.home directory.
>>
>> Solr has always supported this.
>>
>> When SolrResourceLoader.openResourceL
27 matches
Mail list logo
