Well done : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1847
meanwhile, is there any workaround ?
On 3/26/10, Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com wrote:
Please file a bug for this on the JIRA.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 7:21 AM, Abdelhamid
hey thx.
i think the component runs so far, but i don´t see what it brings me.
my first autocompletion-solution was with EdgeNGram ... and its exactly the
same result ...
can anyone, plese show me the advantages of the Issue-1316 ?!
--
View this message in context:
But wait... embedded Solr doesn't support multicore, does it? Just
off memory, I think it's fixed to a single core.
Erik
On Mar 25, 2010, at 10:31 PM, Lance Norskog wrote:
All operations through the SolrJ work exactly the same against the
Solr web app and embedded Solr. You code
Embedded supports MultiCore - it's the direct core connection thing
that supports one.
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com (mobile)
On Mar 26, 2010, at 7:38 AM, Erik Hatcher erik.hatc...@gmail.com
wrote:
But wait... embedded Solr doesn't support multicore, does it? Just
off
I want to apply this patch http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1316
to solr 1.4 so I can implement the autocomplete feature
ca anyone help?
Hi Lance,
Yes, that is once solution but wouldn't it stop people searching for
something like choice in the first place? I mean, if I encode such
characters at the index time, one would have to write a query like
lt;choice. Am I right?
Thanks,
Niraj
Lance Norskog wrote:
To display
Hi Lance,
apologies.. please ignore my previous mail. I'll have a look at the
PatternReplaceFilter.
Thanks,
Niraj
Niraj Aswani wrote:
Hi Lance,
Yes, that is once solution but wouldn't it stop people searching for
something like choice in the first place? I mean, if I encode such
Heya hey.
i have little trouble with my tomcat and my security-constraint
i have 4 cores, in these cores all should be protected via username and pwd,
but not the select!
my cores are so.
.../solr/search/admin/
.../solr/suggest/admin/
.../solr/searchpg/admin/
.../solr/suggestpg/admin/
this
We're using Solr 1.4 Java replication, which seems to be working
nicely. While writing production monitors to check that replication
is healthy, I think we've run into a bug in the status reporting of
the ../solr/replication?command=details command. (I know it's
experimental...)
Our monitor
I've had the exact same frustration with Multicore and Solr... You
need to explicitly layout each pattern with the corename in it.
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 8:35 AM, stockii st...@shopgate.com wrote:
Heya hey.
i have little trouble with my tomcat and my security-constraint
i have 4 cores, in
To apply the patch you need the source, you may have it from Solr svn, using
an ide will greatly make things friendly,
Applying the patch is a matter of left click on the project and .. apply
patch !
On 3/26/10, nabil rabhi nabil.rab...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to apply this patch
thanks for the reply Abdelhamid, but could you give me more details please?
2010/3/26 Abdelhamid ABID aeh.a...@gmail.com
To apply the patch you need the source, you may have it from Solr svn,
using
an ide will greatly make things friendly,
Applying the patch is a matter of left click on the
i try this, but with no changes =(
do you have an short example for dummies like me ? ;)
--
View this message in context:
http://n3.nabble.com/Tomcat-5-5-Security-Constraint-tp676516p676677.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Well, The patch itself is a plain text by which a patch tool use to update a
project source, it's editable with any text editor.
You understand by this that you have to build the project yoursef after
applying the patch.
In general you need to:
- Download an IDE with svn client, Eclipse is a
Where is the OOM coming from? One of the usual problems is that
your database connection is set up to retrieve the entire results set
at once rather than process it in chunks. Search the mail archive for
DIH and/or memory and you'll find this discussed numerous times...
HTH
Erick
On Thu, Mar 25,
Hi,
I need to store structured information in an index entry for use when
filtering. As XML, this could be expressed as:
item
some_fields_that_are_searched_using_dismax /
data
item type=foo x=100 y=200 /
item type=bar x=300 y=1000 /
/data
I would represent each item element as a document, and each attribute as
the fields of the document.
if the field names are not known upfront, you could create 'dynamic fields'.
Kumar_/|\_
www.saisk.com
ku...@saisk.com
making a profound difference with knowledge and creativity...
On
Hi,
Is there an easy way to prevent a field from being returned in the response?
we can use fl=field1, field2, field3, ...
but then our software has an option that must trigger the presence or not of a
field in the response.
So what I'd like to do is tell Solr to return all fields except one.
Thanks everyone,
I was following the solrj wiki which says:
If you want to use MultiCore features, then you should use this:
File home = new File( /path/to/solr/home );
File f = new File( home, solr.xml );
CoreContainer container = new CoreContainer();
container.load(
Seems like a short-coming to me. I would rather it not parse it unless
there is some delimiter to break it, other than white space since white
space is used in phrases.
Instead of this,
name:bob content:climate
Maybe use a comma,
name:bob,content:climate
name:bob foo bar,content:climate
I tried escaping the whitespace, but no avail. It is still be broken into two
tokens and the whitespace. Has anyone else tried this?
-Original Message-
From: Ahmet Arslan [mailto:iori...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 4:05 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re:
Got it working, there was a typo.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Chaffee [mailto:jchaf...@ebates.com]
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 1:05 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: keyword query tokenizer
I tried escaping the whitespace, but no avail. It is still be broken into two
If description is your field name(say), then you could declare description in
your schema.xml as non stored by specifying stored=false in the field
declaration as in
field name=description stored=false
Manas
From: Jean-Sebastien Vachon
You could send the field and have the client ignore it. --wunder
On Mar 26, 2010, at 1:50 PM, Nair, Manas wrote:
If description is your field name(say), then you could declare description in
your schema.xml as non stored by specifying stored=false in the field
declaration as in
field
I have checked out trunk from the new svn location that has the merged
lucene/solr. When I try to build it, it gets a certain distance through
the build and spits out this:
BUILD FAILED
/opt/ncindex/src/solr/trunk/solr/common-build.xml:178: The copy type
doesn't support the nested resources
Is there a trouble in downloading Ant 1.7 and setting the new ANT_HOME ??
On 3/26/10, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
I have checked out trunk from the new svn location that has the merged
lucene/solr. When I try to build it, it gets a certain distance through the
build and spits out
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
I have checked out trunk from the new svn location that has the merged
lucene/solr. When I try to build it, it gets a certain distance through the
build and spits out this:
BUILD FAILED
I have a items table on db1 and and item_descriptions table on db2.
The items table is very small in the sense that it has small columns while
the item_descriptions table has a very large text field column. Both tables
are around 7 million rows
What is the best way to import these into one
What's the recommendation for the best way for detecting replication
slave replication health, using Solr 1.4 Java replication? The
current details command returns a lot of useful data, but it's not
obvious how best to extract the answer to the simple question: is
replication ok, slow or failed?
Hello to all,
I've been working with Solr for a few weeks and I have gotten indexing and
searching to work.
However I am having trouble with indexing HTML content and using
HTMLStripCharFilterFactory.
My schema.xml looks like this
fieldType name=text class=solr.TextField
:
: I am curious as to why the query parser does any tokenizing? I would think
: you would want control/configure this with your analyzers?
:
: Does anyone know the answer to this. Is there a performance gain or something?
it's not about performance, it's about hte query parser syntax.
Is it possible to perform Tika extraction on multiple files that are indexed
as part of a single document?
: select?Species=Pseudonaja+textilisHospital=Griffith+Base+Hospital
:
: ... instead of:
:
: q=Species:'Pseudonaja+textilis'+Hospital:'Griffith+Base+Hospital'
Try this, i *think* it will work for you...
33 matches
Mail list logo
