You don't need to optimize, only commit.
This means that the JVM spends 98% of its time doing garbage
collection. This means there is not enough memory.
I made a mistake - the bug in Lucene is not about PDFs - it happens
with every field in every document you index in any way- so doing this
in Ti
You can write a Lucene program that walks the various index data
structures and tots up estimated values. It's a big job. I would start
with the Lucene CheckIndex program since it does most of this.
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 4:32 AM, Israel Ekpo wrote:
> Currently, this feature is not available.
>
>
There should be a single-quote before the http:. Is this missing in
the command you tried, or is thus just a cut&paste error?
To see exactly what command lines the shell runs, do 'set -x'.
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : I am using Windows XP, curl 7.19.5, Solr 1.4.1
Look at solrconfig.xml - the element controls this.
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Jason Chaffee wrote:
> Cool, I must have configured something wrong then, because it wasn't
> working for me.
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:erik.hatc...@gmail.com]
> Sent
So QueryComponent is the place to do this? Are query analyzers already done?
Would I have access to stems, synonyms, tokens, etc of the query?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Query-modification-tp939584p940941.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archiv
I wanted to extend my question some. My original question about collapsing
null fields is still open, but in trying to research elsewhere I see a lot
of angst about the Field Collapse functionality in general. Can anyone
summarize what the current state of affairs is with it? I'm on Solr 1.4,
ju
Thanks for the info. I'll try this out.
Regards,
Indika
On 3 July 2010 20:48, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
> > I'd like to know if its possible to boost the score of
> > documents based on a
> > field value. Ex. My schema has a field called isFeatured, and if the
> > value of the field
> > is true or "1
Hi Jan,
The vocabulary of my domain is very small and pretty controlled. Users will ask
queries about features of our products, and we have less than one hundred
features.. So the idea is to have a text field "features" storing all the
features. And, re: the multilingualism, I can have "feature
I"ll be watching this one as I hope to be loading lots of docs soon.
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
EARTH has a Right To Life,
otherwise we all die.
Read 'Hot, Flat, and Crowded'
Laugh at http://www.yert.com/film.php
--- On Fri, 7/2/10, Jim Blomo wrote:
> From: Jim Blomo
> I'd like to know if its possible to boost the score of
> documents based on a
> field value. Ex. My schema has a field called isFeatured, and if the
> value of the field
> is true or "1" I'd like to
> have these documents come first in a query result
> regardless of the score.
Yes it is possible
Hi,
It would help to know more about the actual application, and see some use cases
in order to answer that question. I thought that this would be free-text
queries from users, and as soon as you have free-text then you WILL get all
kinds of stuff in the queries. However, if your users are well
Hi,
SolrJ uses slf4j logging. As you can read on the wiki
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solrj#Solr_1.4 you need to provide the slf4j-jdk14
binding (or any other log framework you wish to bind to) yourself and add the
jar to your classpath.
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS -
Hello all,
I'd like to know if its possible to boost the score of documents based on a
field value.
Ex. My schema has a field called isFeatured, and if the value of the field
is true or "1" I'd like to
have these documents come first in a query result regardless of the score.
Thanks in advance.
Currently, this feature is not available.
The amount of space a field consumes varies and depends on whether the field
is index only, stored only or indexed and stored.
It also depends on how the field is analyzed
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 6/30/2010 5:44 PM, Shaw
14 matches
Mail list logo
