Look at solrconfig.xml - the <httpCaching> element controls this. On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Jason Chaffee <jchaf...@ebates.com> wrote: > Cool, I must have configured something wrong then, because it wasn't > working for me. > > Thanks! > > -----Original Message----- > From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:erik.hatc...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 7:51 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: REST calls > > Solr has 304 support with the last-modified and etag headers. > > Erik > > On Jun 30, 2010, at 7:52 PM, Jason Chaffee wrote: > >> In that case, being able to use Accept headers and conditional GET's >> would make them more powerful and easier to use. The Accept header >> could be used, if present, otherwise use the query parameter. Or, >> vice >> versa. Also, conditional GET's are a big win when you know the data >> and >> results are not changing often. >> >> Jason >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ysee...@gmail.com [mailto:ysee...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Yonik >> Seeley >> Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 7:12 AM >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: Re: REST calls >> >> Solr's APIs are described as "REST-like", and probably do qualify as >> "restful" the way the term is commonly used. >> >> I'm personally much more interested in making our APIs more powerful >> and easier to use, regardless of any REST purity tests. >> >> -Yonik >> http://www.lucidimagination.com > >
-- Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com
