satya,
sorry for being a bit harsh, but did you read the answer of Erick in the
'problem with storing??'-thread at all?
just ask the same question again (and not answering old questions) might
be a bit disappointing for people who want to help you.
just my side-note ...
Regards,
Peter.
> Hi all
hi,
i am sorry the mail u sent was in sent mail... I didnt look it I am
going to check now.. I will definetely tell u the entire thing
regards,
satya
I can't see a way of retrieving five results from one type and five from
another in a single query. The only way I can think about that would have a
similar behaviour would be:
?q=ContentType:(News+OR+Analysis)&sort=DatePublished+desc&start=0&rows=10
This way you'll have the first 10 results bein
Hi all,
I read in a previous thread [1] that also the branch3.x version could be a
good choice, but I don't know what differences exist at the moment between
the two versions and how stable branch3.x is. Maybe someone else could point
these things out.
My 0.0002 cents.
Tommaso
[1] : http://markmai
Hi,
I have a scenario in which I have to find count of distinct unique IDs
present in a field (rootId field in my case) for a particular query.
I require this for pagination purpose.
Is there a way in Solr to do something like this we do in SQL:
select count(distinct(rootId))
from table
where (
hi,
would faceting work?
http://www.lucidimagination.com/Community/Hear-from-the-Experts/Articles/Faceted-Search-Solr
if you have a field for rootId that is multivalued + facet on it -- you'll get
value+count pairs back (top 100 i think by default)
bec :)
On 16 July 2010 16:07, Ninad Raut wrot
Hi,
Using Solr 1.4, I'm now working on adding spatial search options, such as
distance-based sorting, Bounding-box filter, etc.
To the best of my knowledge, there are three possible points we can start from:
1. The http://blog.jteam.nl/2009/08/03/geo-location-search-with-solr-and-lucene/
2. Th
Hi Jon,
SolrJ (CommonsHttpSolrServer) internally uses apache http client to connect
to solr. You can check there for some documentation.
I secured solr also with BASIC auth-method and use the following snippet to
access it from solrJ:
//set username and password
((CommonsHttpSolrServe
Apologies I didn't make the requirement clear.
I need to keep the best N documents - set A (chosen by some criteria - call
them sponsored docs) in front of the natural scoring docs - set B so that I
return (A,B). The set A docs need to all score above 1% of maxScore in B
else they join the B set
hi,
I checked out the admin page and it is indexing for others.In the log
files i dont get anything when i send the documents. I checked out the log
in catalina(tomcat). I changed the dismax handler from q=*:* to q= . I
atleast get the response when i send pdf/html files but dont even get for
This is simple faceting, doesn't even have to be a multi-valued
field. Just index your description field with the desired stop word
removal and other analysis that you want done, and
&facet.field=description
Erik
On Jul 15, 2010, at 3:26 AM, Peter Karich wrote:
Dear Hoss,
I wi
This is Condition example:
I have employee with name Rajani and her ID 2
And another employee name also Rajani ID 3 and another also Rajani with id 4
When i make a facet on name:rajani and facets on ID ,Results will be like
Name = rajani
ID=1
ID= 2
ID =3
What I needed is Like
(Name
Hi,
I am writing a EventListener that put some data in the content on import
start:
ctx.setSessionAttribute( DOCTYPE_MAPPING, docTypeMap, Context.SCOPE_GLOBAL
);
but it doesn't seem to work.
looking at the trunk code of ContextImpl.java the globalSession is not
called:
private void putVal(St
that's actually what i already had in mind, just wasn't sure that specifying
the sort order of indextime eliminates the work of scoring.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/how-to-eliminating-scoring-from-a-query-tp968581p972325.html
Sent from the Solr - User mail
I want to know if what i am trying to achieve is doable using solr.
I have some objects that have tags assigned. Tag is as string with weight
attached,
so whole document that i want to index can look like that:
{
id: 123,
tags: {
tag1: 0.01,
tag2: 0.3,
...
It may just be a mis-wording, but if you do distinct on 'unique' IDs, the
count should be the same as response.numFound. But if you didn't mean
'unique', just count of some field in the results, Rebecca is correct,
facets should do the job. Something like:
?q=content:query+text&facet=on&facet.fie
Hi,
Why do you need the weight for the tags?
you could index it this way:
{
id: 123
tag:'tag1'
weight: 0.01
uniqueKey: combine(id, tag)
}
{
id: 123
tag:'tag2'
weight: 0.3
uniqueKey: combine(id, tag)
}
and specify the query-time boost with the help of the weight.
Retri
Peter Karich wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Why do you need the weight for the tags?
>
The only reason to include weights is to sort results by weights.
So if there are multiple documents containing given tag,
i want them to be sorted by weight. Also i would like to be able
to seach by multiple tags at
Hi,
I'm trying to run ant task "generate-maven-artifacts" in lucene-solr
build.xml file.
But getting this error:
/home/chardex/lucene/dev/lucene/common-build.xml:312: Error deploying
artifact 'org.apache.lucene:lucene-core:jar': Error deploying artifact: File
/home/chardex/lucene/dev/lucene/build/$
I came up with another idea, which seem to do what i want. Any comments about
better solutions
or improving efficiency are welcome:
for each document create multivalue text field "tags" with all tags,
and multiple dynamic fields for each tag containging value, so we have:
{
id: 123
tags: tag1
Hi Bilgin,
Thanks for the snippet -- that helps a lot.
-Jon
-Original Message-
From: Bilgin Ibryam [mailto:bibr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 1:31 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Securing Solr 1.4 in a glassfish container AS NEW THREAD
Hi Jon,
SolrJ (Common
Seems to me that you are doing externally to Solr what you could be doing
internally. If you had ONE field as and weighted those in your SOLR
query, that is how I am guessing it is usually done.
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
EARTH has a Right To Life,
otherwise we all die.
So does this mean that each document has a different weight for the same tag?
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
EARTH has a Right To Life,
otherwise we all die.
Read 'Hot, Flat, and Crowded'
Laugh at http://www.yert.com/film.php
--- On Fri, 7/16/10, fiedzia wrote:
> From: fie
I hope that those who know will answer this. I am really interested in it also.
TIA.
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
EARTH has a Right To Life,
otherwise we all die.
Read 'Hot, Flat, and Crowded'
Laugh at http://www.yert.com/film.php
--- On Fri, 7/16/10, Saïd Radhouani wro
I'm also just starting a project requiring spatial indexing so any info would
be greatly appreciated. I had a quick look at the wiki last night and it
appears solr has it built in in the latest version? Not sure if the patches
need applying directly though
My requirements are quite simple, I j
Dennis Gearon wrote:
>
> So does this mean that each document has a different weight for the same
> tag?
>
Exactly. The weight is a weight of a given tag for specific document, not
weight of the field as in weighted search. So one document may have tag1
with weight of 0.1, and another may have
Dennis Gearon wrote:
>
> Seems to me that you are doing externally to Solr what you could be doing
> internally. If you had ONE field as and weighted those in your SOLR
> query, that is how I am guessing it is usually done.
>
I guess i used confusing term for weight. The weight (value assigne
> Exactly. The weight is a weight of a given tag for specific document, not
> weight of the field as in weighted search. So one document may have tag1
> with weight of 0.1, and another may have the same tag1 with weight=0.8.
I've never used it, but I think this is the use case that the Solr featur
Hi Joe,
Take a look at the Cartesian Grid work from Patrick O'Leary here [1]. It's not
fully integrated with Solr and they are moving away from it, but it'll give you
a good idea of how to get started and to go about doing this...
HTH,
Chris
[1] http://www.nsshutdown.com/projects/lucene/whitep
If at all possible I like to do any processing work up front and not deal
with extravagant queries. If your grid definitions don't change, or don't
change often, just assign a cell number to each 100 square grid. Then in a
pre-processing step assign the appropriate cell number to your document
alo
Hi. Peter.
Thanks for replying.
>Hi Scott!
>
>> I am aware these cores on same server are interfering with each other.
>
>Thats not good. Try to use only one core per CPU. With more per CPU you
>won't have any benefits over the single-core version, I think.
I only have 2 servers, each CPU wi
I was curious if anyone has done work on finding what an optimal (or max)
number of client processes are for indexing. That is, if I have the ability
to spin up N number of processes that construct a POST to add/update a Solr
document, is there a point at which the number of clients posting
simult
Thanks for all the suggestions! I'm absorbing them as quickly as I can.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Tag-generation-tp969888p973277.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Tom Burton-West.
Sorry looks my email ISP filtered out your replies. I checked web version of
mailing list and saw your reply.
My query string is always simple like "design", "principle of design", "tom"
EG:
URL:
http://localhost:7550/solr/select/?q=design&version=2.2&start=0&rows=1
Hi. I justed noticed when you add document to solr, turn the auto-commit flag
off, after posting done, commit and optimize. The the speed is super fast.
I was using 31 clients to post 31 solr cores at the same time. I think if you
use 2 clients to post to same core, the question will be "how fa
you mentioned that you have a lot of mem free, but your yetty containers
only using between 40-60 mem.
probably stating the obvious, but have you increased the -Xmx param like for
instance:
java -Xmx1024M -jar start.jar
that way you're configuring the container to use a maximum of 1024 MB ram
ins
Hi,
I am using a function query to tweak my regular query search score, so
search query outputs regular query score modified by some function query. Is
there a way to also obtain a score from regular query?
Thanks!
Isn't it always one of these four? (from most likely to least likely, generally)
Memory (as a ceiling limit)
Disk Speed
WebServer and it's code
CPU.
Memory and Disk are related, as swapping occurs between them. As long as memory
is high enough, it becomes:
Disk Speed
WebServer and it's code
CPU
I didn't looked at payloads as mentioned by Jonathan, but another
solution could be (similar to Dennis'):
create a field 'tags' and then add the tag1 several times to it -
depending on the weight.
E.g. add it 10 times if the weight is 1.0
But add it only 2 times if the weight is 0.2 etc.
Of cours
Looks to me like a sort of way to get to 'categories', if one were interested
in doing that, shudder.
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
EARTH has a Right To Life,
otherwise we all die.
Read 'Hot, Flat, and Crowded'
Laugh at http://www.yert.com/film.php
--- On Fri, 7/16/10, P
> > Each solr(jetty) instance on consume 40M-60M memory.
> java -Xmx1024M -jar start.jar
That's a good suggestion!
Please, double check that you are using the -server version of the jvm
and the latest 1.6.0_20 or so.
Additionally you can start jvisualvm (shipped with the jdk) and hook
into jetty
Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
>
> I've never used it, but I think this is the use case that the Solr feature
> to use Lucene 'payloads' is meant for?
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/08/05/getting-started-with-payloads/
>
This is it, thanks for this link.
--
View this message in conte
Hi All,
Has anyone gotten the DataImportHandler to work with json as
input? Is there an even easier alternative to DIH? Could you show me
an example?
Many thanks,
Tricia
The libraries are searched in the solr/llib directory, not solr home.
If using multicore, solr/core/lib.
These are searched automatically. You can also tell Solr to search in
other directories with the directive in solrconfig.xml.
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 11:48 PM, satya swaroop wrote:
>
> here
Yes, multiple (radix) sorts work and you can use the score value. The
sort parameters come in order, most important to least important.
This sorts first by score, and then documents with the same score are
sorted by field f:
sort=score+desc,f+asc
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Paul wrote:
>
How big is "very big"?
Tomcat has to be configured for the maximum length of the parameter
field in a POST. Is your query string longer than that?
If much of the query string is repeated across queries, you can make a
in solrconfig.xml that adds extra parameters in the
file with a clause.
It i
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Paul wrote:
> I thought of another way to do it, but I still have one thing I don't
> know how to do. I could do the search without sorting for the 50th
> page, then look at the relevancy score on the first item on that page,
> then repeat the search, but add score
Hi,
As soon as I add "sort=first+desc" parameter to the select clause, it
throws ArrayIndexOutOfBound exception. Please suggest if I am missing
anything.
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=girish&start=0&indent=on&wt=json&sort=first+desc
I have close to 1 million records indexed.
Thanks
Gi
This can happen when there are multiple values in a field. Is 'first'
a multi-valued field?
Sorting only works on single-valued fields. After all, if there are
multiple values, it can only sort on one field and there is no way to
decide which one. So, make sure that 'field' has multiValued='false'
49 matches
Mail list logo
