Re: Which version of Solr?

Hello again: Back to the javabin iissue: On Feb 12, 2011, at 6:07 PM, Lance Norskog wrote: > --- But I'm unable to get SolrJ to work due to the 'javabin' version > mismatch. I'm using the 1.4.1 version of SolrJ, but I always get an > HTTP response code of 200, but the return entity is simply a n

Re: Monitor the QTime.

On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > I've recently used a jmx console tool recently, which let's you access and > browse jmx from a simple shell that you start from command line.  Took me 5 > minutes to get it and get info from jmx. [...] Could you share which tool this is?

Re: Monitor the QTime.

I've recently used a jmx console tool recently, which let's you access and browse jmx from a simple shell that you start from command line. Took me 5 minutes to get it and get info from jmx. Otis Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch Lucene ecosystem search :: http://se

Re: high cpu usage

Hi, This could be the JVM doing constant GCing because there is not much room in the heap for new objects (jstat will help you check this). It could also be that you have a deadlock - I just saw a similar case with one of our customers' Solr - out of N CPU cores, one was at 100% and jstack sh

Re: Which version of Solr?

Hi Jeff, For projects that are going live in 6 months I would use trunk. Otis Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/ - Original Message > From: Jeff Schmidt > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Sat, Feb

Re: Which version of Solr?

Great, there be artifacts here! I was able to configure a repo using file:/... to the dist/maven directory, and off we go. Thanks again! Jeff On Feb 13, 2011, at 3:12 PM, Jeff Schmidt wrote: > Thanks David. I really like your book. Will there be a 3.x version coming > along? :) I'm glad to

Re: Which version of Solr?

Thanks David. I really like your book. Will there be a 3.x version coming along? :) I'm glad to hear that 3.x is not many months away from release. I am currently checking out: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/branch_3x Please let me know if that is not correct. Ch

Re: Which version of Solr?

Maven support got a major shot in the arm for releases going forward. If you want to start with 3x, then get the source for that branch and do a build. You should see some ant tasks which build maven artifacts. My guestimate on the 3x release date is 3-4 weeks from now. ~ David Smiley (author o

Re: Which version of Solr?

Thanks Lance, I'll see what I can do with 3.x. I got the latest build #260 from Hudson (apache-solr-3.1-2011-02-13_05-19-21.tgz). While SolrJ 1.4.1 was available to my Maven build, I don't see any 3.x or 4.x client artifacts available out there. It looks like Maven was addressed a while back (h

Re: Difference between Solr and Lucidworks distribution

I believe that the Lucid Works distro for Solr is free and as you mentioned they only appear to sell their services for it. I have used that version for several demos because it does seem to have all the bells and whistles already included and it's super easy to set up. The only downside in my c

Development question

I am working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2155 Trying to get a list of multiValued fields from the cacheŠ ValueSource vs = sf.getType().getValueSource(sf, fp); DocValues llVals = vs.getValues(context, reader); org.apache.lucene.spatial.geohash.GeoHashUtils.decode(llVals.strVal(do