Which os u are using?
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 1:39 AM, Paul Rogers [via Lucene] <
ml-node+2590334-620834624-146...@n3.nabble.com> wrote:
> Hi Guys
>
> I'm trying to integrate solr and nutch as per
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/03/09/nutch-solr/, using the
> branch_3x from svn on Tom
I have used ram disks on slaves, since the master is already persisted.
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Nick Jenkin wrote:
> You could also try using a ram disk,
> mkdir /var/ramdisk
> mount -t tmpfs none /var/ramdisk -o size=m
>
> Obviously, if you lose power you will lose everything..
>
>
You could also try using a ram disk,
mkdir /var/ramdisk
mount -t tmpfs none /var/ramdisk -o size=m
Obviously, if you lose power you will lose everything..
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Lance Norskog wrote:
> This sounds like a great idea but rarely works out. Garbage collection
> has to
My actual:
INFO: [] webapp=null path=/select
params={timeAllowed=3&qt=dismax&q=columbia&rows=1&facet.field={!ex%3Dcat}categories&facet.field={!ex%3Dadv}adventures&facet=true&facet.limit=-1&facet.mincount=1&fq={!tag%3Dcat}categories:Boots&fq={!tag%3Dadv}adventures:Camping}
hits=1 status=0 QTi
Sorry. It was hand typed, it is the other way around. It is part of the actual,
but I did not copy and paste it.
q=query&fq={!tag=cat}categories:Jackets&fq={!tag=adv}adventures:Camping&facet.field={!ex=cat}categories&facet.field={!ex=adv}adventures
On Feb 27, 2011, at 5:48 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote
The basic Solr document ingestion process does not currently support this.
In the DataImportHandler you can configure it to skip any document
that fails a processor. You would have to write your own processor
that hunts for that word and throws an exception.
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Rosa
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Tim Christensen
wrote:
> q=query&fq={!ex=cat}categories:Jackets&fq={!ex=adv}adventures:Camping&facet.field={!tag=cat}categories&facet.field={!tag=adv}adventures
If this is the actual command you used, it looks like you switched
"ex" and "tag"?
-Yonik
http://lucid
This sounds like a great idea but rarely works out. Garbage collection
has to work around the data stored in memory, and most of the data you
want to hit frequently is in the indexed and cached. The operating
system is very smart about keeping the popular parts of the index in
memory, and there is
Okay -- so I did see that before and I tested it. It does work for example when
I do this:
q=query&fq={!ex=cat}categories:Jackets&facet.field={!tag=cat}categories
Thank you for that part. What I don't get is any of the other facet fields
returning their full list of values. So in my case I need
Hi,
LocalParam {!tag} and {!ex} will help you:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#Tagging_and_excluding_Filters
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
On 28. feb. 2011, at 00.41, Tim Christensen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to do the following
if i'm understanding your question, it sounds like
localparams/tagging/exclusion might be what you want:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#Multi-Select_Faceting_and_LocalParams
hth,
rob
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Tim Christensen
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to do the
> I am trying to do the following:
>
> Where a query might return:
>
> Facet 1
> A
> B
> C
>
> Facet 2
> X
> Y
> Z
>
> User selects Facet 1 option A. Normally this paradigm would
> contract the results as in a refining paradigm. That would
> be fine and the obvious UI change. But by doing so, F
Hi,
I am trying to do the following:
Where a query might return:
Facet 1
A
B
C
Facet 2
X
Y
Z
User selects Facet 1 option A. Normally this paradigm would contract the
results as in a refining paradigm. That would be fine and the obvious UI
change. But by doing so, Facet 2 option X is no longe
Hi!
I would like to announce the release of Sol-RA ver 1.1, uses
RankingAlgorithm ver 1.1 and would like to invite you to try it out. It
is very good and does not need any changes to your existing indexes but
the way they are accessed, ranked and scored changes. This version has
Score Boostin
Did you copy the files into the solr/graphics/ directory? That subdirectory
should be the same name as the instanceDir.
That is you should have this directory structure:
solr/graphics/conf/
solr/graphics/data/index/
On Feb 27, 2011, at 5:20 AM, ultranerds wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to get
Hi Guys
I'm trying to integrate solr and nutch as per
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/03/09/nutch-solr/, using the
branch_3x from svn on Tomcat 6. After adding the "nutch" requestHandler to
solrconfig.xml while the solr-example will start on accessing the admin page
I get the following
> I'm trying to get a Solr install to work with multicores,
> as I wanna use it
> on several sites (each totally different, and I don't
> obviously wanna have
> loads of seperate Solr installs)
>
> Here is what I've done so far (Solr was already uploaded
> and working
> normally, without multicore
> I've compiled current source from head, but also tried on
> 1.4.1.
The instructions i posted works with 1.4.1. You need to import TermDocs in
TermsComponent.java :
import org.apache.lucene.index.TermDocs;
Hi,
I'm trying to get a Solr install to work with multicores, as I wanna use it
on several sites (each totally different, and I don't obviously wanna have
loads of seperate Solr installs)
Here is what I've done so far (Solr was already uploaded and working
normally, without multicore):
1) Added
Yes, you are right. Ignore the query (document:*), it wont matter if i have
it for termscomponent i guess.
I've compiled current source from head, but also tried on 1.4.1.
Any idea how to go about finding a solution to this?
Thanks,
Ravish
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
> I want to produce frequency analysis of all tokens inside
> my solr Index from
> a specific (content) field.
>
> When I use TermsComponent or FacetCounts, what I get is how
> many records or
> documents each term appears in (which again confuses me as
> to what the
> difference is, is it facets
Hi Guys,
I need a bit of help.
I want to produce frequency analysis of all tokens inside my solr Index from
a specific (content) field.
When I use TermsComponent or FacetCounts, what I get is how many records or
documents each term appears in (which again confuses me as to what the
difference is
22 matches
Mail list logo
