Do you mean that earlier it was doing indexing well then all of sudden you
started getting this exception?
-
Kumar Anurag
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/background-merge-hit-exception-tp2680625p2680979.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive
My patch is for 4.0 trunk.
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:05 PM, rajini maski rajinima...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Bill Bell . .This query works after applying the patch you refered
to, is it? Please can you let me know how do I need to update the current
war (apache solr 1.4.1 )file with this new
Hi,
is possible to change Solr sending query method from get to post?
because my query has a lot of OR..OR..OR and the log says to me Request URI
too large
Where can i change it??
thanx
--
Gastone Penzo
www.solr-italia.it
The first italian blog about SOLR
Yes it's possible.
Assuming your using SolrJ as a client-library:
set:
QueryRequest req = new QueryRequest();
req.setMethod(METHOD.POST);
Any other client-library should have a similar method.
hth,
Geert-Jan
2011/3/15 Gastone Penzo gastone.pe...@gmail.com
Hi,
is possible to change Solr
Please do not cross-post between lists - yours seems like a user
query to me, so I'm answering it here.
As to your question - Solr does not select the request method -
you do. I've just tested it and Solr happily accepts a query via
a POST request.
However, you'd probably do well to look at
Solandra is great for adding better scalability and NRT to Solr, but
it pretty much just stores the index in Cassandra and insulates that
from the user. It doesn't solve the problem of allowing quick and
direct retrieval of data that need not be searched. I could certainly
just use a Solr search
On Tuesday 15 March 2011 01:31 PM, Anurag wrote:
Do you mean that earlier it was doing indexing well then all of sudden you
started getting this exception?
-
Kumar Anurag
--
View this message in context:
Hi,
I am using Solrj as a Solr client in my project.
While searching, for a few words, it seems Solrj takes more time to send
response, for eg (8 - 12 sec). While searching most of the other words it
seems Solrj take less amount of time only.
For eg, if I post a search url in browser, it shows
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 8:12 AM, rahul asharud...@gmail.com wrote:
I am using Solrj as a Solr client in my project.
While searching, for a few words, it seems Solrj takes more time to send
response, for eg (8 - 12 sec). While searching most of the other words it
seems Solrj take less amount
On 3/14/2011 9:38 PM, onlinespend...@gmail.com wrote:
But my main question is, how do I guarantee that data between my Cassandra
database and Solr index are consistent and up-to-date?
Our MySQL database has two unique indexes. One is a document ID,
implemented in MySQL as an autoincrement
Hi,
I am using Solrj as a Solr client in my project.
While searching, for a few words, it seems Solrj takes more time to send
response, for eg (8 - 12 sec). While searching most of the other words it
seems Solrj take less amount of time only.
For eg, if I post a search url in browser, it shows
We have a D field (string, indexed, stored, not required) that is returned
* when we search with the standard request handler
* when we search with dismax request handler _and the field is specified in
the sort parameter_
but is not returned when using the dismax handler and the field is not
I use Solr + MySql with data coming from several DHI type loaders that
I have written to move data from many different databases into my BI
solution. I don't use DHI because I am not simply replicating the data,
but I am moving/merging/processing the incoming data during the loading.
For me, I
Hi,
I am using Solrj as a Solr client in my project.
While searching, for a few words, it seems Solrj takes more time to send
response, for eg (8 - 12 sec). While searching most of the other words it
seems Solrj take less amount of time only.
For eg, if I post a search url in browser, it shows
--- On Tue, 3/15/11, mrw mikerobertsw...@gmail.com wrote:
From: mrw mikerobertsw...@gmail.com
Subject: Dismax: field not returned unless in sort clause?
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Tuesday, March 15, 2011, 3:21 PM
We have a D field (string, indexed,
stored, not required) that
My solr+jetty+java6 install seems to work well with these GC options.
It's a dual processor environment:
-XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC -XX:+CMSIncrementalMode
I've never had a real problem with memory, so I've not done any kind of
auditing. I probably should, but time is a limited resource.
CMS is very good for multicore CPU's. Use incremental mode only when you have
a single CPU with only one or two cores.
On Tuesday 15 March 2011 16:03:38 Shawn Heisey wrote:
My solr+jetty+java6 install seems to work well with these GC options.
It's a dual processor environment:
Hi @everyone.
I want so sort ASC on a price field, but some of the docs got a 0 (not NULL)
value. Now I want that this docs are at the end when i sort the price field
ascending. Is it possible?
Thanks in advance.
MOuli
--
View this message in context:
Hello list,
I'm trying to use facet's via widget's within Ajax-Solr. I have tried the wiki
for general help on configuring facets and constraints and also attended the
recent Lucidworks webinar on faceted search. Can anyone please direct me to
some reading on how to formally configure facets
The host is dual quad-core, each Xen VM has been given two CPUs. Not
counting dom0, two of the hosts have 10/8 CPUs allocated, two of them
have 8/8. The dom0 VM is also allocated two CPUs.
I'm not really sure how that works out when it comes to Java running on
the VM, but if at all
Hello,
I believe the most recent builds of Solr have started explicitly throwing an
error around sorting on multiValued fields. I'd actually been sorting on
multiValued fields for some time without any problems before this, not sure
how Solr was able to handle this in the past...
In any case,
I am a bit new for Solr.
I am running below query in query browser admin interface
+RetailPriceCodeID:1 +MSRP:[16001.00 TO 32000.00]
I think it should return only results with RetailPriceCode = 1 ad MSRP
between 16001 and 32000.
But it returns all resuts with MSRP = 1 and doesnt consider 2nd
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:35 AM, MOuli zar...@hotmail.de wrote:
I want so sort ASC on a price field, but some of the ouldocs got a 0 (not
NULL)
value. Now I want that this docs are at the end when i sort the
But it returns all resuts with MSRP = 1 and doesnt consider 2nd query at
all.
I believe you mean: 'it returns all results with RetailPriceCodeID = 1 while
ignoring the 2nd query?'
If so, please check that your default operator is set to AND in your schema
config.
Other than that, your syntax
Thank you for the advice. I looked at the page you recommended and came up
with:
http://localhost:8983/solr/search/?q=dogfl=boost_score,genus,species,scorerows=15bf=%22ord%28sum%28boost_score,1%29%29
^10%22
But appeared to have no effect. The results were in the same order as they
were when I
That's pretty interesting to use the autoincrementing document ID as a way
to keep track of what has not been indexed in Solr. And you overwrite this
document ID even when you modify an existing document. Very cool. I
suppose the number can even rotate back to 0, as long as you handle that.
I
Regarding the DIH problem: I'm encountering content not allowed in prolog
only when I'm deploying solr on tomcat. I'm using the same data-config.xml
in the solr example through jetty and it works fine and I can index the
data. Please let me know what should be changed while using tomcat.
Thanks,
the page you recommended and came up
with:
http://localhost:8983/solr/search/?q=dogfl=boost_score,genus,species,scorerows=15bf=%22ord%28sum%28boost_score,1%29%29
^10%22
But appeared to have no effect. The results were in the
same order as they
were when I left off the bf parameter. So
I have a core with 120+ segment files and I tried partial optimize specify
maxNumSegments=10, after the optimize the segment files reduced to 64 files;
I did the same optimize again, it reduced to 30 something;
this keeps going and eventually it drops to teen number.
I was expecting seeing the
I got rid of the problem by just copying the other schema and config files(
which sound like nothing to do with the error on the dataconfig file but I
gave it a try) and it worked I don't know if I'm missing something here
but its working now.
Thanks,
Ram.
--
View this message in context:
Could possibly be your original xml file was in unicode (with a BOM
header - FFFE or FEFF) - xml will see it as content if the underlying
file system doesn't handle it.
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:00 PM, sivaram yogendra.bopp...@gmail.com wrote:
I got rid of the problem by just copying the other
I'm not sure if I get what you are trying to achieve. What do you mean
by constraint?
Are you saying that you effectively want to filter the facets that are
returned?
e.g. for source field, you want to show html/pdf/email, but not, say xls
or doc?
Upayavira
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:38 +,
Thanks Ahmet, I indicated that in the wiki at
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters
My solution was a little bit different since I wanted to get the analyzer per
field name:
rb.getSchema().getField(name).getFieldType().getAnalyzer()
thanks again!
paul
Le 15 mars 2011
I am using solr 1.4.1. I am trying to index a spanish field using the
following tokenizer/filters:
Using field analysis solr Admin i can tell StopFilterFactory and
SnowballPorterFilterFactory with Spanish not working right:
1. after
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 7:07 PM, cyang2010 ysxsu...@hotmail.com wrote:
I just copied the text from this URL to form my stopwords_es.txt:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk/modules/analysis/common/src/resources/org/apache/lucene/analysis/snowball/spanish_stop.txt
you cannot use
: If it works, it's performant and not too messy it's a good way :-) . You can
: also consider just faceting on Id, and use the id to fetch the categoryname
: through sql / nosql.
: That way your logic is seperated from your presentation, which makes
: extending (think internationalizing, etc.)
The stack trace indicates there's an issue with optimizing. How are
you kicking off
optimizing? Is it automatic or manual?
34G for an index with that many documents does seem excessive. Are you
re-indexing the same
content with the same unique key? In other words do you have a large
number of
: Not sure how you are indexing, but in addition to the above
: suggestion by Yonik, one could ignore 0's at indexing time,
: i.e., ensure that 0 values for that field are not indexed, and
: use sortMissingLast.
Once upon a time i had a usecase where i was indexing product data, and in
thta
Robert,
Thanks for your advice. I modified my stopword text file. Now the
stopwordFilter start to work.
But the stemming related filter (SnowballPorterFilterFactory-- spanish)
still not working. Anyone have any idea on that?
Thanks,
cyang
--
View this message in context:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 8:50 PM, cyang2010 ysxsu...@hotmail.com wrote:
Robert,
Thanks for your advice. I modified my stopword text file. Now the
stopwordFilter start to work.
But the stemming related filter (SnowballPorterFilterFactory-- spanish)
still not working. Anyone have any idea
Sorry Robert. I just use some text translated by someone. Maybe that
translation is not right.
Could you please give me a spanish term which i can show the spanish
stemming factory is working?
Thanks,
cyang
--
View this message in context:
Hi,
I remember reading in this list a while ago that Solr will only tokenize on
whitespace even when using CJKAnalyzer. That would make Solr unusable on
Chinese or any other languages that don't use whitespace as separator.
1) I remember reading about a workaround. Unfortunately I can't find
I just tried with some real spanish text:
Alquileres --
=
org.apache.solr.analysis.LowerCaseFilterFactory {}
term position 1
term text alquileres
term type word
source start,end4,14
payload
Hello,
I am trying to build source out of trunk (to apply a patch) and ran into an
issue were the build process hangs ( below output) during build lucene at
sanity-load-lib.
Just when build sanity-load-lib starts, I see an dialog box asking for applet
access permission The applet is
Hi Guys,
came across this sorting query
query ({!v=category: 445}) desc
I understand it is sorting on exact match of category = 445, I don't quite
understand the syntax, could someone please elaborate a bit for me? So I can
reuse this syntax in the future.
Regards
James
Hi Andy,
Is the I don't know what language the query is in something you could change
by...
- asking the user
- deriving from HTTP request headers
- identifying the query language (if queries are long enough and texty)
- ...
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Hi Harish.
Did sorting on multiValued fields actually work correctly for you before?
I'd be surprised if so. I could be wrong but I think you previously always
got the sorting affects of whatever was the last indexed value. It is indeed
the case that the FieldCache only supports up to one
I've a column for posts in MySQL of type `text`, I've tried corresponding
`field-type` for it in Solr `schema.xml` e.g. `string, text, text-ws`. But
whenever I'm importing it using the DIH, it's getting imported as a BLOB
object. I checked, this thing is happening only for columns of type `text`
Hi,
I actually don't follow how field collapsing helps with autocompletion...?
Over at http://search-lucene.com we eat our own autocomplete dog food:
http://sematext.com/products/autocomplete/index.html . Tasty stuff.
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene
Kai, try SOLR-1086 with Solr trunk instead if trunk is OK for you.
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
From: Kai Schlamp kai.schl...@googlemail.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Hi Otis,
It doesn't look like the last 2 options would work for me. So I guess my best
bet is to ask the user to specify the language when they type in the query.
Once I get that information from the user, how do I dynamically pick an
analyzer for the query string?
Thanks
Andy
--- On Tue,
When I use the Porter Stemmer in Solr, it appears to take works that are
stemmed and replace it with the root work in the index.
I verified this by looking at analysis.jsp.
Is there an option to expand the stemmer to include all combinations of the
word? Like include 's, ly, etc?
Other options
Hi. Where did you find such an obtuse example?
Recently, Solr supports sorting by function query. One such function is
named query which takes a query and uses the score of the result of that
query as the function's result. Due to constraints of where this query is
placed within a function
53 matches
Mail list logo
