He
I had the same problem. It's fix now. But it comes with a new issue:
I get results for all company's in London. Now i want the following facets:
10km(20)
20km(34)
40km(55)
40km can be outside of London. There are only company's in london in my
results.
The company's outside of London are
Hi Antonio,
Sorry, I really want to help you but I'm not understanding your point,
what query did you do? can you please add more details, or if I lost
some details can you point me to this?
Thanks, Quirino
On 20/05/11 01:35, antonio wrote:
Excuse me, i wrong to write 197085, correct is
Hello.
Also you can index only soccerclub always deleting the whitespace in the
expression with a charFilter. This behaviour must be also applied in search
context. So then you have:
1. Index time: soccer club -- soccerclub indexed.
2. Search time: soccer club OR soccerclub -- soccerclub
Each core need to be queried separately,
http://localhost:8983/solr/fund_dih/select?q=
http://localhost:8983/solr/fund_tika/select?q=
Regards,
Rohit
-Original Message-
From: Zhao, Zane [mailto:zane.z...@fil.com]
Sent: 20 May 2011 07:50
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: How can
Hello,
Thanks, i think both are good options. I prefer the option with the filter.
What does
a charfilter look like?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Results-with-and-without-whitespace-soccer-club-and-soccerclub-tp2934742p2964950.html
Sent from the Solr -
Or, if you want results from both together, you can use the distributed
search [1].
Just decide which one of the cores will be the collector and add the
shards=localhost:8983/solr/fund_dih,localhost:8983/solr/fund_tika parameter
like :
SolrServer server = new CommonsHttpSolrServer(
Thanks for the help so far,
I don't think this solves the problem. What if my data look like this:
soccer club Manchester united
if i search for soccerclub manchester and for soccer club manchester i
want this result back.
A copyfield that removes whitespaces is not an option.
With the
Thanks y'all. Approximate poll summary, including those that voted multiple
choice:
[3] I always use the JDK logging as bundled in solr.war, that's perfect
[6] I sometimes use log4j or another framework and am happy with re-packaging
solr.war
[5] Give me solr.war WITHOUT an slf4j logger
At my company. I've been spending some time figuring out the best approach
for inline prefix Auto completion. Most of the support for auto completion
is based solely on prefix matching, as it can jump to a certain term within
a field quickly and break the enumeration loop when the prefix no
Hello again. Unfortunately, I'm still getting nowhere with this. I
have checked-out the 3.1 source and applied Jayendra's patches (see
below) and it still appears that the contents of the files in the
zipfile are not being indexed, only the filenames of those contained files.
I'm using a
Yes. Was that not what I was supposed to do?
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Koji Sekiguchi k...@r.email.ne.jp wrote:
(11/05/20 3:45), Brian Lamb wrote:
Hi all,
Based on advice I received on a previous email thread, I applied patch
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2338. My goal
Hi Gora,
Thanks for the reply. That was really fast.
Yes, the Northwind DB is a sample test DB, and I have been using that DB for
testing quite extensively. The fields exist, and select statements had been
verified. :)
The documentations for SOLR however mentions nothing about declaring
Have you tried url-encoding?
http://localhost:8180/solr/test-public/select/?q=test-id:1sort=test%2Did+asc
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
On 19. mai 2011, at 10.50, Marc SCHNEIDER wrote:
Hi,
I have a field called test-id but I can't use it when
Hi All,
I'm running the following query.
http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=greenversion=2.2indent=onqt=dismax;
fq=fKeyword:NITROGENfq=fKeyword:corn
facet=onfacet.mincount=1facet.field=fKeyword
What this returns me is a set of results which has both the keywords
in fKeyword. Instead I need
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:35 PM, fredylee
fredy_ru...@co.washington.or.us wrote:
[...]
The documentations for SOLR however mentions nothing about declaring fields
in the schema.xml in order for data import to work. I must have missed it.
So All I need to do is declaring field name? like the
I added these statement to schema.xml, however the full import is still not
indexing the rows.
field name=companyname type=text indexed=true stored=true/
field name=Customers type=text indexed=true stored=true /
field name=customerID type=text indexed=true stored=true /
field
Cool! suggestion: you might want to replace
externalVal.toLowerCase().split( );
with
externalVal.toLowerCase().split(\\s+);
also I bet folks might have different ideas about what to do with
hyphens, so maybe:
externalVal.toLowerCase().split([-\\s]+);
In fact why not make it a
This may or may not help you, we solved something similar based on
hyphenated words - essentially when we encountered a hyphenated word
(say word1-word2) we send in a OR query with the word (word1-word2)
itself, a phrase word1 word2~3 and the word formed by removing the
hyphen (word1word2).
But
Ahh yes, thanks for the suggestions! I've implemented them.
I thought about you're second point previously and had encountered that
issue. Once it's tokenized, I don't believe there is a way to get the full
string back from the token stream.
--
View this message in context:
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Dhanushka Samarakoon dhan...@gmail.com wrote:
What this returns me is a set of results which has both the keywords
in fKeyword. Instead I need all the records that has at least one of them as
a keyword.
I have not tested this, but fq should as far as i know
That worked. Thanks :-)
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Tor Henning Ueland
tor.henn...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Dhanushka Samarakoon dhan...@gmail.com
wrote:
What this returns me is a set of results which has both the keywords
in fKeyword. Instead I need all the
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Dhanushka Samarakoon dhan...@gmail.com wrote:
That worked. Thanks :-)
Great! :)
--
Regards
Tor Henning Ueland
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: It is fairly simple to generate facets for ranges or 'buckets' of
: distance in Solr:
: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpatialSearch#How_to_facet_by_distance.
: What isnt described is how to generate the links for
Thank you for your replies guys.
Personally I like the flatten=true option.
However there is still one issue with it. After stripping the tags away,
I get JoeSmith instead of Joe Smith with a space (solr 3.1).
Did anyone run into this issue?
Cheers,
Alexei
--
View this message in context:
Hello,
I have been trying to return highlighted text in original order and without
removing anything from it.
Seems that highlighter sorts my text by score and skips the sections that do
not have a score.
I am sure I am missing something simple.
Has anyone had a similar issue?
I have tried
Bill (et al.) :
The issue I'm running into (apologies for explaining it poorly previously)
is how to reference the query term in the definition of bf in solrconfig.
e.g. I can statically define the search term (in this case love) in
solrconfig.xml, and results are as I desire:
lst
On my Solr 1.4.1 master I am doing commits regularly at a fixed interval. I
noticed that from time to time commit will take longer than the commit
interval, causing commits to overlap. Then things will get worse as commit
will take longer and longer. Here is the logs for a long commit:
: But in my JAVA logs, i simply get this snippet:
: ### 13 05/19 17:27:52:333 ### Runner@9be1041:: (SOLR failed with
: SolrException for DocId = [2dac611a5bb7ce87831dc0245ffcb66a] and detailed
: Exception: [org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Internal Server Error
Unfortunately detailed
So what was my mistake? I still have not resolved this issue.
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Brian Lamb
brian.l...@journalexperts.comwrote:
Yes. Was that not what I was supposed to do?
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Koji Sekiguchi k...@r.email.ne.jpwrote:
(11/05/20 3:45), Brian Lamb
Hi Gary,
I tried the patch on the the 3.1 source code (@
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/lucene_solr_3_1/)
as well and it worked fine.
@Patch - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2416, which deals
with the Solr Cell module.
You may want to verify the contents from the
30 matches
Mail list logo
