Re: Performance issue: Frange with geodist()

is it possible with geofilt and facet.query? facet.query={!geofilt pt=45.15,-93.85 sfield=store d=5} On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 4:20 PM, roySolr royrutten1...@gmail.com wrote: I don't want to use some basic facets. When the user doesn't get any results i want to search in the radius of his

Re: Field Collapsing and Record Filtering

current: bool //for fq which searches only current versions last_current_at: date time // for date range queries or group sorting what was current for a given date sorry if i've missed a requirement lee c On 13 October 2011 15:01, Mike Sokolov soko...@ifactory.com wrote: We have the identical

Re: Field Collapsing and Record Filtering

sorry missed the permission stuff: I think thats ok if you index the acl as part of the document. That is to say each version has its own acl. Match users against version acl data as a filter query and use last_current_at date as a sort On 13 October 2011 22:04, lee carroll

Re: Dismax question

: Deja-Vu... : : http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/3551f130b6772799/excluding_docs_from_results_based_on_matched_field : : -Hoss : : Thanks for the answer, the problem is that the query like this: : : q=foodefType=dismaxqf=titlebq={!dismax qf='title desc' v=$q} : : causes

Re: upgrading 1.4 to 3.x

Hi Otis, I know it is coming from Tomcat and was curious if anyone had the same problem before... and as for details it is the only thing i got in the logs as an error... i can put more details if you tell me what exactly you want to see... i am confused and dunno what else i can put other than

Re: Replication with an HA master

I have the luxury of JMS in my environment, so that may be a simple way to solve this... Sent from my iPhone On Oct 13, 2011, at 4:02 PM, Robert Stewart bstewart...@gmail.com wrote: Yes that is a good point. Thanks. I think I will avoid using NAS/SAN and use two masters, one setup as a

SolrJ stripping Carriage Returns

We recently updated our Solr and Solr indexing from DIH using Solr 1.4 to our own Hadoop import using SolrJ and Solr 3.4. While everything seems to be working, we seem to have one stumper of a problem. Any document that has a string field value with a carriage return \r is having that

Update specific field on Solr index

Hello, I'm working on solr 1.4 with around 10 millions documents. Usually, it's fine. However, the issue arises when I add new field to the schema.xml, I need to reindex the whole database for that new field. Indexing the whole database with the whole properties takes so long to do. It would be

Re: Update specific field on Solr index

Hi Chhorn, There is currently no better way - you need to update/re-add the whole document. But Solr 1.4 is rather old.  If you get Solr 3.4 your indexing speed will go up noticeably! Otis Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch Lucene ecosystem search ::

Re: Xsl for query output

Thanks for the response but I have seen this page and I had a few questions. 1. Since I am using tomcat, I had to move the example directory into the tomcat directory structure. In the multicore, there is no example.xsl. Where do I need to put it? Also, how do I send docs for indexing when