Re: questions about autocommit & committing documents

2011-10-22 Thread darul
Old entry but I try to configure auto commit. I am still not sure to understand how Solr handles the commit process. Does Solr really wait for 1 documents before send a commit ? I was thinking, it will use maxTime and then commit a number of documents less than 1. Could you please corre

Re: data import in 4.0

2011-10-22 Thread Adeel Qureshi
yup that was it .. my data import files version was not the same as solr war .. now I am having another problem though I tried doing a simple data import simple in terms of just pulling up three fields from a table and adding to index and this worked fine but wh

Re: How to make UnInvertedField faster?

2011-10-22 Thread Michael McCandless
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 4:10 AM, Simon Willnauer wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Michael McCandless > wrote: >> Well... the limitation of DocValues is that it cannot handle more than >> one value per document (which UnInvertedField can). > > you can pack this into one byte[] or use more

Bet you didn't know Lucene can...

2011-10-22 Thread Grant Ingersoll
Hi All, I'm giving a talk at ApacheCon titled "Bet you didn't know Lucene can..." (http://na11.apachecon.com/talks/18396). It's based on my observation, that over the years, a number of us in the community have done some pretty cool things using Lucene/Solr that don't fit under the core premis

Re: Solr Open File Descriptors

2011-10-22 Thread samarth s
Thanks for sharing your insights shawn On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 1:27 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 10/16/2011 12:01 PM, samarth s wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Is it safe to assume that with a megeFactor of 10 the open file >> descriptors >> required by solr would be around (1+ 10) * 10 = 110 >> ref: *htt

Re: How to make UnInvertedField faster?

2011-10-22 Thread Simon Willnauer
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Michael McCandless wrote: > Well... the limitation of DocValues is that it cannot handle more than > one value per document (which UnInvertedField can). you can pack this into one byte[] or use more than one field? I don't see a real limitation here. simon > > Ho