This is an issue with extractOnly=true on Solr 3.6.1. We upgraded to 4.0 Beta
2 and the problem went away. Just in case anyone runs into this.
Sincerely,
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Cougarman [mailto:acoug...@bwc.org]
Sent: 23 August 2012 12:27 PM
To:
Hi. We're using Solr 4.0 Beta. Is it possible to have a 2-dimensional array in
Solr schema? For example, you want to store this information in a field:
MyCustomField:
- Text
- FileName
So each text has a filename associated with it. Thanks.
Sincerely,
Alex
Hi. I'm looking for a tutorial on how to set up two cores for a Solr 4.0 Beta
instance. I've found this tutorial for earlier versions of Solr:
http://drupal.org/node/484800
Also, what are Collections in Solr 4? Are they related to cores? Thanks.
Sincerely,
Alex
I have a setup for /select handler which, regarding highlighting, looks roughly
like this:
requestHandler name=/select class=solr.SearchHandler
default=true
lst name=defaults
str name=defTypeedismax/str
str
More detail: So, when Solr returns results, we'd get XML that looks like this:
doc
arr name=text
str filename=abcdef.docxdkjfkjdfkjdkfj/str
str filename=ghijklm.docxkdjfkjdkfj/str
/arr
/doc
Sincerely,
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Cougarman
I managed to narrow it down to the presence of dynamic field *_custom_txt in
the hl.fl list. If the list contains only regular fields the highlighting works
fine.
However, I also want to highlight some dynamic fields.
Is this a bug?
Thanks,
Yoni
-Original Message-
From: Yoni Amir
Hi. I'm looking for a tutorial on how
to set up two cores for a Solr 4.0 Beta instance.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin
Both example-DIH and multicore can be used as an example.
cd solr/example
java -Dsolr.solr.home=example-DIH/solr -jar start.jar
java -Dsolr.solr.home=multicore -jar
Multivalued fields come back in the order you index them. So you could
have a field named filenames and another field named filecontents,
and as long as you indexed them both in the same order, they'd appear
in the results in the same order. So iterating over them would be like
iterating over two
You may want to take a look at the wiki for SolrCloud:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCloud/
But, you may just need a simple master-slave replication setup:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication
SolrCloud is certainly preferred for large multi-shard, multi-replica
configurations, but
I am unable to reproduce this scenario of all fields being highlighted. In
fact, from looking at the code, I don't see a way that could happen.
Further, the code, both 4.0-BETA and 3.6.1 as well as trunk, does NOT
support glob patterns within a comma/space-delimited list of fields. Only
a
It is possible. Also, those settings are not saved across restarts.
You really should use a logging properties file.
Other ways to check on freezes:
1) run garbage collection logging or monitoring.
2) poll the statistics requesthandler and log.
3) poll the thread list and log.
On Fri, Aug 24,
How much memory is allocated? There is a feature in modern Unix
systems called 'Large Pages' or 'Huge Pages'. This is an operating
system feature to run very large processes with better virtual memory
tracking strategies inside the CPU RAM subsystem. Search for 'Large
Pages' and 'Translation
Not really. The percentage given in other search packages is fairly
bogus. You have to do a global batch analysis of all of the index to
get a true scale for relevance.
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Ramzi Alqrainy
ramzi.alqra...@gmail.com wrote:
You are right Mr.Ravish, because this depends
Also, there is a logging feature to print intermediate values.
Another point is the complexity of your query. It can be easier to
test with the query as a database view, instead of embedding it in the
DIH script.
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com wrote:
That is
Mr Norskong, et al,
On 26 August 2012 14:37, Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, there is a logging feature to print intermediate values.
I see the data as it should be. It's just not recorded into SOLR. One
possible concern is that I have timestamp in epoch seconds, which I'd like
The timestamp format is 2012-01-01T01:01:01, with an optional Z001 for
milliseconds. The timezone is UTC. This is a standard format but I do
not remember the name of the standard.
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Hasan Diwan hasan.di...@gmail.com wrote:
Mr Norskong, et al,
On 26 August 2012
ISO 8601.
The entire standards is rather complex, so most software uses a subset of it. A
useful subset is described here: http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-datetime
ISO 8601 does not allow Z001 for milliseconds. The Z is for UTC (Zulu in
military time) and follows the time portion. Milliseconds (or
Hi Erick
Thanks For reply.
My use case is I have 50 fields to index , but at the time of index all 50
fields data is unavailable.
So we have divided them in to 24 separate cores and indexing . we are using
shards for querying. But the problem is each core is having huge data. Total
size of
Thanks, I found GroupResponse was added in Solr 3.4 so I have to update
version :)
Roman
Dne 24.8.2012 18:09, Erick Erickson napsal(a):
3.6 has a getNGroups, does that do what you want?
Best
Erick
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:23 AM, Roman Slavík sla...@effectiva.cz wrote:
Hi guys,
we are
19 matches
Mail list logo
