On 10/14/2012 5:45 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
About your second point. Try committing more often with openSearcher
set to false.
There's a bit here:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrConfigXml
1
15000
false
That should keep the size of the transaction log d
Hi,
I've tried Solr4.0 release version with SolrCloud feature.
But some of documents are not properly indexed. Is this a bug of solr?
Steps to reproduce:
1) Make two solr instances running:
(Almost same with Example A in http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCloud).
---
cp -r example example2
Are you looking for the sum of the scores of each document in the
result? In other words, if there were 1000 documents in the numFound
but you only of course show 10 (or 0 depending on rows parameter) you
want the sum of all the scores of 1000 documents in a separate section
of the results?
If so,
Do these settings apply to DIH? The example linked seems to refer to
updateHandler, but I am not sure how/whether that affects DIH.
Regards,
Alex.
P.s. I was also having OOMs on large DIH imports.
Personal blog: http://blog.outerthoughts.com/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalo
PS, I have found that there lots of segment in index directory, and most of
them is empty, like . totoal file number is 35314 in index directory.
-rw-rw-r-- 1 admin systems 0 Oct 14 11:37 _k3n.fdx
-rw-rw-r-- 1 admin systems 0 Oct 14 11:37 _k3o.fdt
-rw-rw-r-- 1 admin systems 0 Oct 14 11
Hi Rui,
You don't need to merge the resulting indices (1 index per Reducer is
what I assume you are asking about). Each could be copied to a
different Solr server and you could then use regular old Solr
distributed search to search across them.
You don't want to search indices while they are in
Did you tried below options
0.0
10.0
This is from java doc
/** When forceMergeDeletes is called, we only merge away a
* segment if its delete percentage is over this
* threshold. Default is 10%. */
public TieredMergePolicy setForceMergeDeletesPctAllowed(double
On 10/14/2012 3:21 PM, Rafał Kuć wrote:
Hello!
Try adding the following to solrconfig.xml:
I did this and got a little further, but still no go. From what it's
saying now, I don't think it will be possible in the current state of
branch_4x to use anything but the default.
SEVERE: null:j
bq: is there any way to get a sum of all the scores for a query
not that I know of. I'm not sure what value this would be anyway,
what do you want to use it for? This seems like an XY problem...
Best
Erick
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Gilles Comeau wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Very quick question
About your second point. Try committing more often with openSearcher
set to false.
There's a bit here:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrConfigXml
1
15000
false
That should keep the size of the transaction log down to reasonable levels...
Best
Erick
On Sun, Oct
Hello!
Try adding the following to solrconfig.xml:
--
Regards,
Rafał Kuć
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch - ElasticSearch
> On 10/14/2012 12:19 AM, Walter Underwood wrote:
>> There is a bit more info in this post, look for "alternative codecs":
>>
>> http://searchhu
On 10/14/2012 12:19 AM, Walter Underwood wrote:
There is a bit more info in this post, look for "alternative codecs":
http://searchhub.org/dev/2012/10/12/apache-solr-and-lucene-4-0-0-released/
I'm running on branch_4x checked out yesterday at 13:59 MDT. I tried
postingsFormat="Block" and "Bl
I'll try to be more specific Jack.
I just download the apache-solr-4.0.0.zip, from this archive I took the
core1 and core2 folders from multicore example and rename them to
collection1 and collection2, I also did all necessary changes on solr.xml
and solrconfig.xml and schema.xml on these two corr
This thread will serve as a reference on my config layout for at least
one other thread that I will be creating for discussion.
I have an existing infrastructure for Solr 3.5.0, using the included
Jetty6. I am working on a new infrastructure for Solr 4, using its
included Jetty8.
My solrcon
Please see my other thread called "Testing Solr4 - reference thread"for
general information about my config layout. If more specific information
is required, please let me know.
So far I cannot get a solr.war built without slf4j bindings to work
right. There does not seem to be any centrally
There's a miscommunication here somewhere. Is Solr 4.0 still passing "*:*"
to the analyzer? Show us the parsed query for "*:*", as well as the
debugQuery "explain" for the score.
I mean, "*:*" (MatchAllDocsQuery) has a "constant score", so there isn't any
way for it to be "suboptimal".
-- Ja
Jack,
I don't think SOLR-3261 describes this issue.
I ran the same experiment with Solr-3.6 and the score for all the
matches was 0.1626374.
The newly released Solr 4.0.0 also returns a suboptimal score of 0.14764866.
Kuro
On 10/12/12 2:03 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
I don't have a Solr 3.5 to c
Can you file an issue and attach your logs?
You might also try the 4.0 release to see if the problem was fixed after
the beta.
- Mark
On 10/14/2012 08:48 AM, Jam Luo wrote:
Yes, I have the same problem.
2012/10/5 Kyryl Bilokurov
Hi,
I have a functional/performance test SolrCloud cluster
On 10/14/2012 11:16 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
No, that's not what I'm thinking at all. There would be _no_
replication configured. You'd just have two completely independent
installations, one in each of your separate locations. The only
communication path would be that somehow the original docum
Thanks! The configuration left to me by my predecessor expects those JARs to
be in a "lib" subdirectory of the instance. Now that I've copied the new
JARs into the instance, things are working much better.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/java-lang-NoSuchField
We have a maven project to build a war containing everything from the Solr war,
plus some of our own code. Here's the relevant stuff from our pom.xml:
war
org.apache.solr
solr-core
org.apache.solr
solr
No, that's not what I'm thinking at all. There would be _no_
replication configured. You'd just have two completely independent
installations, one in each of your separate locations. The only
communication path would be that somehow the original documents
would need to get to both locations for ind
Well, the lines below don't look right, notice that
it's finding dataimporthandler...3.1.0.jar.
Looks like you have a bunch of old jars hanging around, how did you
install 4.0 anyaway?
**
INFO: Adding
'file:/opt/solr/multicore/lpf/lib/apache-solr-dataimporthandler-extras-3.1.0.jar'
to
On 10/14/2012 12:19 AM, Walter Underwood wrote:
There is a bit more info in this post, look for "alternative codecs":
http://searchhub.org/dev/2012/10/12/apache-solr-and-lucene-4-0-0-released/
If I were to add this to the Solr wiki as potential options under
postingsFormat, would it be correc
In other words, I would have to apply a mixture of modes: SolrCloud for each
location + old-style replication for mirroring.
BTW, I've seen a notion of 'role' in node cloud state. Is it in use or is
there for future extensions? Having 'indexer' and 'searcher' roles backed by
the infrastructure wou
It's finding all the config files just fine. Here is the full traceback:
2012-10-14 11:56:00.501:INFO:oejs.Server:jetty-8.1.2.v20120308
2012-10-14 11:56:00.516:INFO:oejs.NCSARequestLog:Opened
/opt/solr/logs/request.2012_10_14.log
2012-10-14 11:56:00.519:INFO:oejdp.ScanningAppProvider:Deployment mo
The directory structure is a bit changed between 3.6 and 4.x, there's
an additional
level. Be sure you're not being caught by that, you'll see
"collection1" in there
by default
Try specifying -Dsolr.conf.dir=, although it's just a guess.
Best
Erick
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Alexandre
My guess it is having troubles finding a directory where lpf core lives.
You see to be on a *nix system, have you tried running truss/strace
and seeing which directories solr is looking for lpf core in? Maybe
the definition of 'home' directory is not being picked up?
Regards,
Alex.
Personal
Just upgraded from SOLR 3.6 to SOLR 4 and am getting this error. Can anyone
she any light on this? Is there a way to turn on more debugging? Here is the
traceback:
Oct 13, 2012 1:34:13 PM org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer create
SEVERE: Unable to create core: lpf
org.apache.solr.common.SolrExcept
I can't quite parse "the same multicore deployment as we have on apache solr
4.0 distribution archive". Could you rephrase and be more specific. What
"archive"?
Were you already using 4.0-ALPHA or BETA (or some snapshot of 4.0) or are
you moving from pre-4.0 to 4.0? The directory structure did
Right. Then it seems like you have to index the doc to both solr1 and solr2
then. This assumes that you do NOT intend the two indexes to be identical
when all is said and done, right? They'll contain different documents.
Because if you _do_ intend the indexes to be identical, replication is your
a
First, remember that SolrCloud is relatively new, operational issues
like this will doubtless accrue "folk wisdom" as we all gain experience...
But my current thinking is that the remote installations are essentially
completely separate installations with no knowledge of each other. Your
indexing
Thanks for the response!
Its a bad news that it isnt that simple I hoped.
Certainly I need names and a timestamp for the comment. There are any
problems if I want to add a timestamp in the one long string? Apart from
this can I add this one long string to the index?
Example:
table blog: id, autho
Yes, I have the same problem.
2012/10/5 Kyryl Bilokurov
> Hi,
>
> I have a functional/performance test SolrCloud cluster (using Solr
> 4.0-BETA) with the following setup: 4 servers, each server hosts 1/4th of
> the collection (no replicas, so there are only leaders for each shard).
> Current ZK
You can merge indexes. You cannot split them.
jefferyyuan wrote:
>Thanks for the reply, but I think SolrReplication may not help in this case,
>as we don't want to replicate all indexs to solr2, just a part of
>index(index of doc created by me). Seems SolrReplication doesn't support
>replicate
Solr's Java Replication feature downloads changes to an index. It does
not need to pull the entire index.
I think what you need to do with the SolrEntityProcessor is this:
do a Solr sorted query on your "last modified" field and fetch the
timestamp from the first row. This would go in an outer 'en
Two answers:
1) Do you have maybe user names or timestamps for the comments?
Usually people want those also.
2) You can store the comments as one long string, or as multiple
entries in a field. Your database should have a concatenate function
that will take field X from multiple documents in a join
Hi,
As far as I understand, SolrCloud eliminates the master-slave specifics, and
automates both update and search seamlessly.
What should I take into account configuring SolrCloud for a large customer
with multiple physical locations?
I mean, for older Solr I would define master 'close to the data'
38 matches
Mail list logo
