On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Peter Keegan peterlkee...@gmail.comwrote:
But how to get the values for docs that match some arbitrary query?
You can specify eff in fl param. it's implied by
http://docs.lucidworks.com/display/solr/Function+Queries
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
On 10/3/2013 8:03 PM, Brian Robinson wrote:
Hi Shawn,
Thanks for responding. Just saw this email. I did go to the logging tab
in the admin page, but it never finished loading. I'm using collection1,
and I'm using the traditional config. Here is my complete code, with
$options omitted for
I will go with that. I've just wondered about could I do it with existence
test data or not.
2013/10/4 Otis Gospodnetic otis.gospodne...@gmail.com
Maybe storing the protocol info in a separate field would be cleaner.
Otis
Solr ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Oct 3, 2013
On 10/3/2013 11:29 PM, Sadler, Anthony wrote:
Time:
-
On some servers we're dealing with something in the region of a million or
more files. Indexing that many times takes upwards of 48 hours or more. While
the script is now fairly stable and fault tolerant, that is still a pretty
No direct help but a bunch of related random thoughts:
1) How are you running Tika? As a jar loading from scratch every time? Tika
can also run in a server mode where it listens to a network socket. You
send the file, it sends the extract back. Might be faster.
2) Deleting old stuff. You can
Thanks for the tips. When I got time, I will have a look into it and I will
try to use solr via the embedded jetty.
Regards,
Roland.
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 8/14/2013 5:16 AM, Roland Everaert wrote:
For the past months I have deplaoyed and
I suggest you to look at here:
http://www.javadocexamples.com/java_source/org/apache/lucene/wikipedia/analysis/WikipediaTokenizerTest.java.html
2013/10/4 Ken Krugler kkrugler_li...@transpac.com
Hi all,
Where's the documentation on the WikipediaTokenizer?
Specifically I'm wondering how
Did you check here at logs:
*Caused by: java.io.FileNotFoundException:
/opt/solr/myCore/data/index/_2he9.si (No such file or directory)*
2013/10/4 tamanjit.bin...@yahoo.co.in tamanjit.bin...@yahoo.co.in
Hi,
We migrated to Solr 4.3 from 3.5 yesterday. We use multicore Master Slave
There is an old question like that:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/201101.mbox/%3CAANLkTi=itRz7ni6HV-m=GTThzLb9G8XkWi92jBn=p...@mail.gmail.com%3E
Also you check that page for general information:
http://websolr.com/guides/solr-clients
2013/10/4 Neeraj Pandey
Hi!
Imagin a collection collection1 with 3 shards, replicationFactor=2 and
maxShardsPerNode=2 hosted on three machines.
Then add a new collection, collection2 configured the same.
Cool, so now we have three machines each with 4 cores, a shard leader and a
replica for each of the two collection.
Hi
Does the size of ID field matter .. in terms of memory usage...and query
performance...
i.e. will Solr use more memory if you use a URL string as ID field instead
of a int value?
./zahoor
Hi,
I have been asked the same question. There are only DELETEALIAS and CREATEALIAS
actions available, so is there a way to achieve uninterrupted switch of an
alias from one index to another? Are we lacking a MOVEALIAS command?
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS -
Using arbitrary strings affects at least on the traffic between the
shard(s) and a querying client or shards and a frontend solr instance. We
have actually hit such an issue, described here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4903, which has triggered the
suggestion for ids compaction:
In the last Solr versions Atomic Updates were introduced
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Atomic_Updates
I'm wondering, updating a field that is
stored=true indexed=true
would be different as updating a field that is
stored=true indexed=false
Would Solr try to reindex the doc only if the field is
I did see that. The file its looking for doesn't exist post slaves have been
updated. I suspect there was segment info file of that name before the
syncing happened and once the file was removed the searcher still looks for
the file. Strange behavior, don't know why should this happen.
--
View
Hello ,
I am using solr 4.0 , I want to sent a list of objects to solr as a request
parameter. Is it possible ? Please let me know.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Can-I-pass-some-Object-as-request-parameter-to-solr-server-tp4093463.html
Sent from the Solr
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013, at 11:19 AM, maephisto wrote:
In the last Solr versions Atomic Updates were introduced
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Atomic_Updates
I'm wondering, updating a field that is
stored=true indexed=true
would be different as updating a field that is
stored=true
I've used this feature to great effect. I have logs coming in, and I
create a core for each day. At the end of each day, I create a new core
for tomorrow, unload any cores over 2 months old, then create a set of
aliases (all, month, week, today) pointing to just the cores
that are needed for that
The two techniques for sending lists of values/objects to Solr are comma or
spaces delimited single parameter values, or multiple instances of the
parameter name, one per value/object.
Solr has no object-encoding per se, and has no parameters that are
generalized objects, but you can use any
Hi guys,
I was thinking how to activate the DocValues approach for using faceting.
Tell me if I am correct :
1) enable in schema.xml for the field of interest, the DocValues attribute
set to true.
2) use one of these 2 faceting strategies : fc ( Field Cache) or fcs (Per
segment Field Cache)
3)
I've implemented a SearchRequest class at my application. It has some
custom fields and filled via web services automatically from a JSON object
(via jackson). Inside a core class I retrieve proper attributes from that
class and send a query to Solr server.
If you have an API class to reach your
It all depends. I mean, if you have 20 million URLs averaging 40 characters
each, that's 80 MB, not a big deal at all, but if you have 20 billion URLs
that would take up 80 GB, which might be a big deal. But if you shard those
20 billion documents into 10 shards, 8 GB may or may not be a big
Hi
I want to display result as one Dataset thorough solr using Multicore.In one
core Containg EnglishCollectionData and onther containg HindiCollectionData.
When I am join two core result is displayed when I am giving English Parameter
But does not work For Hindi Parameter.Could me give the
Thank you!
My question is actually what's the difference in updating an indexed field
vs. updating a non-indexed field? Will updating an indexed field trigger a
refresh in the solr indexes while in the other case wouldn't?
--
View this message in context:
I'm trying to get rid of the following warnings:
[2013-10-03 17:37:56.981] WARNING Using deprecated class:
XmlUpdateRequestHandler -- replace with UpdateRequestHandler
[2013-10-03 17:37:56.983] WARNING Using deprecated class:
BinaryUpdateRequestHandler -- replace with UpdateRequestHandler
On 10/4/2013 6:56 AM, maephisto wrote:
My question is actually what's the difference in updating an indexed field
vs. updating a non-indexed field? Will updating an indexed field trigger a
refresh in the solr indexes while in the other case wouldn't?
A change is a change. It doesn't matter
On 10/4/2013 7:16 AM, Erlend Garåsen wrote:
[2013-10-03 17:37:56.981] WARNING Using deprecated class:
XmlUpdateRequestHandler -- replace with UpdateRequestHandler
[2013-10-03 17:37:56.983] WARNING Using deprecated class:
BinaryUpdateRequestHandler -- replace with UpdateRequestHandler
How do
Check out: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5302 can do this
using query facets
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.comwrote:
sum(x, y, z) = x + y + z (sums those specific fields values for the
current document)
sum(x, y) = x + y (sum of those two
Check out: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5302 it supports
median value
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 12:11 PM, William Bell billnb...@gmail.com wrote:
If you are a programmer, you can modify it and attach a patch in Jira...
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 4:25 AM, Marcin Rzewucki
Many thanks for your reply.
We're running Solr 4.4.0 in production, but SolrJ 3.6 is still used by
our CMS connector. I will place your reply as a comment in our own Jira
and do the necessary changes later when we are ready to upgrade SolrJ
for our connector.
Erlend
On 10/4/13 4:05 PM,
Is there a way to use the function return value for a range query
For example: I have two price fields pricea and priceb and now i want to get
the values where the sum of the pricea and priceb is between [0 TO 5]
Something like *select?q={!func}sum(pricea,priceb):[0 TO 5]*
I can't calculate
I think the best you can do is compute sum(pricea,priceb) at index time as a
third field, say priceSum, and then you can do a range query on that
priceSum field.
It would be nice to be able to have a query that evaluates arbitrary
expressions combining field values, but there is no such
Thanks for the quick answer. I thought that :-)
Is there any plan add such a functionality in the future. Or is it completely
against the concept.
Bests Sandro
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jack Krupansky [mailto:j...@basetechnology.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 4. Oktober 2013 16:41
An:
I have some info and examples for the WikipediaTokenizer in my book, but a
tokenizer does not direct tokens to a field. Rather, you would use the
tokenizer in the analyzer for whatever field you wish to store values in.
You could use the same input for multiple fields and then filter the tokens
No plan that I know of, but there is a new Lucene expression module, so
maybe it is not so farfetched. Its performance might not be so great, but if
you need the flexibility it might be worth it.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Sandro Zbinden
Sent: Friday, October 04,
Thanks for the guidance, Shawn. I am in fact using Tomcat instead of
Jetty, but the logging was working OK at one point, so I'm not sure what
changed to make it not work. I'll have to investigate that. I'll check
out your other suggestions as well.
Brian
On 10/4/2013 1:43 AM, Shawn Heisey
Hello,
and thank you for your answer Shawn.
I tried to simplify my problem but I realize I chose a bad example : I
don't process phone numbers, and I do process unstructured documents.
My GATE application might return several annotations for the same group of
words (because I'm using an
Hi,
When a distributed search is done, the inital query is forwarded to all
shards that are part of the specific collection that we are querying.
My question here is, Which is the machine that does the aggregation for
results from shards?
Is the machine which receives the initial request?
I
It ended up that I just needed to restart Tomcat. Once you mentioned the
logging, it sounded like something somewhere just got stuck, so
rebooting took care of it. I should have just done that in the first place.
Brian
On 10/4/2013 1:43 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 10/3/2013 8:03 PM, Brian
I need to sort documents returned in order of (descending)score
(descending)value of an int field within the document. How do I ensure
proper sort order as well as good performance ?
I don't need the sort-order defined by sort=score desc,intField desc. The
sort order needs to be somewhat like
Hi,
im playing around with solr 4.4. Just started it and tried to create new
cores. First hurdle was the fact that no solrconfig.xml and no schema.xml
were found in the classpath. So I copied and configured into
example/resources, because that directory is in the classpath.
Now I am able to
On 10/4/2013 1:49 PM, helt wrote:
Now I am able to create cores, but new cores don't have their own config
file. Is this intended behavior? I haven't found much documentation for
these features.
I think I miss something basic here. Is it really normal, that no
configuration files are being
Yes, the machine that gets the initial request is the one that distributes
to the shards and the aggregates the results.
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 9:55 AM, yriveiro yago.rive...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
When a distributed search is done, the inital query is forwarded to all
shards that are part
43 matches
Mail list logo
