Not too sure what you're asking. Are you saying that you want to only
return a relevant part of a field in search results - i.e. a contextual
snippet?
If so, then you should look at the highlighting component, which can do
this.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters
Upayavira
On Mo
Hey Hoss,
I would be interested in being a moderator.
Thanks,
Andrew
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Jeevanandam M. wrote:
> Hello Hoss -
>
> My pleasure, kindly accept my moderator nomination.
>
> Regards,
> Jeeva
>
> -- Original Message --
> From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:hos
For exact phrase match you can wrap the query inside quotes but this will
perform the exact match and it wont match other results.
The below query will match only : Okkadu telugu movie stills
http://localhost:8983/solr/core1/select?q=%22okkadu%20telugu%20movie%20stills%22
Since you are using Edg
Thanks for your valuable answers.
As a first approach I will evaluate (manually :( ) hits that are out of the
intersection set for every query in each system. Anyway I will keep
searching for literature in the field.
Regards.
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Doug Turnbull <
dturnb...@opensourc
Hello everyone,
We are using solr 4.4 version production with 4 shards. This is our memory
settings.
-d64 -server -Xms8192m -Xmx12288m -XX:MaxPermSize=256m \
-XX:NewRatio=1 -XX:SurvivorRatio=6 \
-XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC -XX:+CMSIncrementalMode
-XX:CMSIncrementalDutyCycleMin=0 \
-XX:CMSIncrementalDut
On 10/21/2013 1:19 PM, Branham, Jeremy [HR] wrote:
Sorl.xml [simplified by removing additional cores]
These cores that you have listed here do not look like SolrCloud-related
cores, because they do not reference a collection or a shard. Here's
what I've got on a 4.2.1
I've made progress...
Rather than using the zkCli.sh in the zookeep bin folder, I used the java libs
fom SOLR and the config now shows up.
Jeremy D. Branham
Performance Technologist II
Sprint University Performance Support
Fort Worth, TX | Tel: **DOTNET
http://JeremyBranham.Wordpress.com
htt
When I use the Zookeeper CLI utility, I'm not sure if the configuration is
uploading correctly.
How can I tell?
This is the command I am issuing -
./zkCli.sh -cmd upconfig -server 127.0.0.1:2181 -confdir
/data/v8p/solr/root/conf -confname defaultconfig -solrhome /data/v8p/solr
Then checking wit
Hi,
i'm new in solr.
i use the content field to extract the text of solr documents, but this
field is too long.
Is there a way to extract only a substring of this field?
i make my query in java as follow:
SolrQuery querySolr = new SolrQuery();
querySolr.setQuery("*:*");
querySolr.setRows(3);
quer
I would agree the "right" way to do this is probably just add the
information I wish to sort on directly, as a date field or something like
that.
The issue is we currently have ~300m documents that are already indexed.
Not all of the fields have stored=true (for good reason, we maintain the
docume
In Solr 4.5, I'm trying to create a new collection on the fly. I have a
data dir with the index that should be in there, but the CREATE command
makes the directory be:
_shard1_replicant#
I was hoping that making a collection named something would use a directory
with that name to let me use the d
Hopefully at the end of the week.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: fudong li
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 1:45 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Custom FunctionQuery Guide/Tutorial (4.3.0+) ?
Hi Jack,
Do you have a date for the new version of your book:
solr
Hi Jack,
Do you have a date for the new version of your book:
solr_4x_deep_dive_early_access?
Thanks,
Fudong
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> Take a look at the unit tests for various "value sources", and find a Jira
> that added some value source and look at the patc
On 10/21/2013 9:48 AM, Tom Mortimer wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've been working on an installation recently which uses SolrCloud to index
45M documents into 8 shards on 2 VMs running 64-bit Ubuntu (with another 2
identical VMs set up for replicas). The reason we're using so many shards
for a relativel
Take a look at the unit tests for various "value sources", and find a Jira
that added some value source and look at the patch for what changes had to
be made.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: JT
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 1:17 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject:
Hi Michael,
I agree with Shawn, don't listen to Peter ;) but only this once -
he's a smart guy, as you can see in list archives.
And I disagree with Shawn. again, only just this once and only
somewhat. :) Because:
In general, Shawn's advice is correct, but we have no way of knowing
your
Does anyone have a good link to a guide / tutorial /etc. for writing a
custom function query in Solr 4?
The tutorials I've seen vary from showing half the code to being written
for older versions of Solr.
Any type of pointers would be appreciated, thanks.
Hi i am using field type configuration in the following way.
--
View this message in context:
http://luc
Hi Gun,
Thanks for the response.
Indeed I only want docValues to do facets.
IMHO I think that a reference to the fact that docValues take precedence over
other methods is needed. Is not always obvious.
--
Yago Riveiro
Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig)
On Monday, October
You need to provide us with the fieldtype information..
If you just want to match the phrase entered by user, you can use
KeywordTokenizerFactory..
Reference:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters
Creates org.apache.lucene.analysis.core.KeywordTokenizer.
Treats the entire
Hello Yago,
To my knowledge, in facet calculations docValues take precedence over other
methods. So, even if your field is also stored and indexed, your facets won't
use the inverted index or fieldValueCache, when docValues are present.
I think you will still have to store and index to maintain
Sorry if I don't make understand, my english is not too good.
My goal is remove pressure from the heap, my indexes are too big and the heap
get full very quick and I get an OOM. I read about docValues stored on disk,
but I don't know how configure it.
A read this link:
https://cwiki.apache.org
I realise now that distributed pivotal faceting is not implemented yet in
SolrCloud after some digging through the internet.
Apologies :)
Den 21/10/2013 kl. 18.20 skrev Henrik Ossipoff Hansen
:
> Hello,
>
> We have a rather weird behavior I don't really understand. As written in a
> few othe
Hello,
We have a rather weird behavior I don't really understand. As written in a few
other threads, we're migrating from a master/slave setup running 4.3 to a
SolrCloud setup running 4.5. Both run on the same data set (the 4.5 instances
have been re-indexed under 4.5 obviously).
The following
I really don't understand the question. What behavior are you seeing
that leads you to ask?
bq: Is it necessary duplicate the field and set index and stored to false
and
If this means setting _both_ indexed and stored to false, then you
effectively
throw the field completely away, there's no point
some basic tips.
-try to create enough shards that you can get the size of each index portion on
the shard closer to the amount of RAM you have on each node (e.g. if you are
~140GB index on 16GB nodes, try doing 12-16 shards)
-start with just the initial shards, add replicas later when you have
Hi everyone,
I've been working on an installation recently which uses SolrCloud to index
45M documents into 8 shards on 2 VMs running 64-bit Ubuntu (with another 2
identical VMs set up for replicas). The reason we're using so many shards
for a relatively small index is that there are complex filte
I did a full-import again. That solved the issue. I didn't know that the
stopwords apply on the indexing itself too.
Thanks a lot,
Stavros
Am 21.10.2013 17:13, schrieb Jack Krupansky:
Did you completely reindex your data after emptying the stop words file?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original M
Did you completely reindex your data after emptying the stop words file?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Stavros Delisavas
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 10:05 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Local Solr and Webserver-Solr act differently ("and" treated
like
On 10/21/2013 8:03 AM, michael.boom wrote:
> I'm using the m3.xlarge server with 15G RAM, but my index size is over 100G,
> so I guess putting running the above command would bite all available
> memory.
With a 100GB index, I would want a minimum server memory size of 64GB,
and I would much prefer
On Mon, October 21, 2013 10:04 AM, Toke Eskildsen wrote:
>On Fri, 2013-10-18 at 18:30 +0200, Lemke, Michael SZ/HZA-ZSW wrote:
>> Toke Eskildsen wrote:
>> > Unfortunately the enum-solution is normally quite slow when there
>> > are enough unique values to trigger the "too many > values"-exception.
>
HI Jack
Thanks a lot for your explanation.
2013/10/21 Jack Krupansky
> Start with org.apache.solr.handler.**component.QueryComponent#**prepare
> which fetches the fq parameters and indirectly invokes the query parser(s):
>
> String[] fqs = req.getParams().getParams(**CommonParams.FQ);
> if (
Well no, the OS is smarter than that, it manages file system cache along with
other memory requirements. If applications need more memory then file system
cache will likely be reduced.
The command is a cheap trick to get the OS to fill the file system cache as
quickly as possible, not sure how
Okay, I emtpied the stopword file. I don't know where the wordlist came
from. I have never seen this and never touched that file. Anyways...
Now my queries do work with one word, like "in" or "to" but the queries
still do not work when I use more than one stopword within one query.
Instead of too m
Koji , thank you for reply.
I am just using the binary of solr.war , I will try to use the solr source
and have a try .
-Mingz
On 10/21/13 6:21 PM, "Koji Sekiguchi" wrote:
>Hi Mingz,
>
>If you use Eclipse, you can debug Solr with your plugin like this:
>
># go to Solr install directory
>$ cd
I'm using the m3.xlarge server with 15G RAM, but my index size is over 100G,
so I guess putting running the above command would bite all available
memory.
-
Thanks,
Michael
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-timeout-after-reboot-tp4096408p4096827.html
S
I found this warming to be especially necessary after starting an instance
of those m3.xlarge servers, else the response times for the first minutes
was terrible.
Peter
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 8:39 AM, François Schiettecatte <
fschietteca...@gmail.com> wrote:
> To put the file data into file sy
Start with org.apache.solr.handler.component.QueryComponent#prepare which
fetches the fq parameters and indirectly invokes the query parser(s):
String[] fqs = req.getParams().getParams(CommonParams.FQ);
if (fqs!=null && fqs.length!=0) {
List filters = rb.getFilters();
// if filters already e
Kumar
You might want to look into the 'pf' parameter:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/The+Extended+DisMax+Query+Parser
François
On Oct 21, 2013, at 9:24 AM, kumar wrote:
> I am querying solr for exact match results. But it is showing some other
> results also.
>
> E
I am querying solr for exact match results. But it is showing some other
results also.
Examle :
User Query String :
Okkadu telugu movie
Results :
1.Okkadu telugu movie
2.Okkadunnadu telugu movie
3.YuganikiOkkadu telugu movie
4.Okkadu telugu movie stills
how can we order these results that 4
To put the file data into file system cache which would make for faster access.
François
On Oct 21, 2013, at 8:33 AM, michael.boom wrote:
> Hmm, no, I haven't...
>
> What would be the effect of this ?
>
>
>
> -
> Thanks,
> Michael
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.4
Hmm, no, I haven't...
What would be the effect of this ?
-
Thanks,
Michael
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-timeout-after-reboot-tp4096408p4096809.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Have you tried this old trick to warm the FS cache?
cat ...//data/index/* >/dev/null
Peter
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 5:31 AM, michael.boom wrote:
> Thank you, Otis!
>
> I've integrated the SPM on my Solr instances and now I have access to
> monitoring data.
> Could you give me some hints on whic
Hi,
If I have a field (named dv_field) configured to be indexed, stored and with
docvalues=true.
How I know that when I do a query like:
q=*:*&facet=true&facet.field=dv_field, I'm really using the docvalues and
not the normal way?
Is it necessary duplicate the field and set index and stored to
Guido, can you point us to the Commons-Compress JIRA issue which reports your
particular problem? Perhaps uncompress works just fine?
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
18. okt. 2013 kl. 14:48 skrev Guido Medina :
> Dont, commons compress 1.5 is broken, e
Shamik:
You're right, the use of NOW shouldn't be making that much of a difference
between versions. FYI, though, here's a way to use NOW and re-use fq
clauses:
http://searchhub.org/2012/02/23/date-math-now-and-filter-queries/
It may well be this setting:
1000
Every second (assuming
You can also try: https://www.varnish-cache.org/
2013/10/21 Alexandre Rafalovitch
> I have not used it myself, but perhaps something like
> http://www.crawl-anywhere.com/ is along what you were looking for.
>
> Regards,
>Alex.
>
> Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
> LinkedIn:
Do two searches.
Why do you want to do this though? It seems a bit strange. Presumably
your users want the best matches possible whether exact or fuzzy?
Wouldn't it be best to return both exact and fuzzy matches, but score
the exact ones above the fuzzy ones?
Upayavira
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013, at 0
Hi Mingz,
If you use Eclipse, you can debug Solr with your plugin like this:
# go to Solr install directory
$ cd $SOLR
$ ant run-example -Dexample.debug=true
Then connect the JVM from Eclipse via remote debug port 5005.
Good luck!
koji
(13/10/21 18:58), Mingzhu Gao wrote:
More information
Thread Dump and/or Remote Debugging?!
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
On 21.10.13 11:58, Mingzhu Gao wrote:
More information about this , the custom analyzer just implement
"createComponents" of Analyzer.
And my configure in schema.xml is just something like :
From the log I cannot see any
Hi,
Just installed SOLR and when running a job I have the following problem :
Error: Repeated service interruptions - failure processing document: Read
timed out
Like I said, just installed SOLR and so very new to the topic. ( On Windows
2008R2 )
SOLR 4.4
Tomcat 7.0.42
ManifoldCF 1.3
Postg
More information about this , the custom analyzer just implement
"createComponents" of Analyzer.
And my configure in schema.xml is just something like :
>From the log I cannot see any error information , however , when I want to
analysis or add document data , it always hang there .
Any wa
> Thanks, I'm new to the clustering libraries. I finally made this
> connection when I started browsing through the carrot2 source. I had
> pulled down a smaller MM document collection from our test environment. It
> was not ideal as it was mostly structured, but small. I foolishly thought
> I
Thank you, Otis!
I've integrated the SPM on my Solr instances and now I have access to
monitoring data.
Could you give me some hints on which metrics should I watch?
Below I've added my query configs. Is there anything I could tweak here?
1024
Hi, guys:
I have an online application with solrcloud 4.1, but I get errors of
syncpeer every 2 or 3 weeks...
In my opinion, a recover occers when a replica can not sync data to its
leader successfully.
I see the topic
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-5x-Errors-while-recovering-td402
Hi,
I have a situation that if user looking for anything first it has to give
the suggestions from the exact match and as well as the fuzzy matches.
Suppose we are showing 15 suggestions.
First 10 results are exact match results.
And remaining 5 results from fuzzy matches.
Can anybody give me
Dear solr expert ,
I would like to write my own analyser ( Chinese analyser ) and integrate them
into solr as solr plugin .
>From the log information , the custom analyzer can be loaded into solr
>successfully . I define my with this custom analyzer.
Now the problem is that , when I try thi
On Fri, 2013-10-18 at 18:30 +0200, Lemke, Michael SZ/HZA-ZSW wrote:
> Toke Eskildsen [mailto:t...@statsbiblioteket.dk] wrote:
> > Unfortunately the enum-solution is normally quite slow when there
> > are enough unique values to trigger the "too many > values"-exception.
> > [...]
>
> [...] And yes
Hi Otis,
In our case, there is no exception raised by tika or solr, a lucene
document is created, but the content field contains only a few white spaces
like for ODF files.
Roland.
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Otis Gospodnetic <
otis.gospodne...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Roland,
>
> It looks
59 matches
Mail list logo
