I have indexed data using Solr.I want to highlight matched keyword in
search results. highlighting is inconsistent.
eg. if search keyword is 'alonso'.
highlighted instances are: *Alonso*,fernando_*alonso*,**#Alonso**MeetVettel
non-highlightes instances are : @fernandoalonso, www.alonsodriver.com
Hi Harsh,
Your query 'alonso' is not matching the text in your non-highlighted instance
examples. Thats why they are not highlighted. It seems that you want to be able
to search inside words too. You can use wildcard operator for this. Please see
for similar discussion:
Hi,
We recently saw a behavior which I wanted to confirm, WE are using solrj to
query solr. From the code, we use HttpSolrServer to hit the query and
return the response
1. When a sample query is hit using Solrj, we get the QTime as 4seconds.
The same query when we hit against solr in the
Hi Ahmet,
Thanks for your reply but i am still not clear on this.Why highlighting
occurs in text (fernando_*alonso, *Fernando*Alonso*(CamelCase) ) these are
also words and Solr is highlighting inside words.
But no highlighting takes place in lowercase 'fernandoalonso'. why is this?
On Thu,
Hi Hars,
Highlighted text samples are matching because of WordDelimiterFilterFactory
splits them. You can see/test the behaviour of your fieldType name=text at
analysis page.
On Thursday, November 28, 2013 11:51 AM, harsh kapoor harshlnm...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Ahmet,
Thanks for your
Hi guys,
I’m using solr 4.5 and for my search i’m using this sort in my query:
sort=div(sum(div(termfreq(alltext,”solr),sum(myfield,10)),div(termfreq(alltext,”lucene),sum(myfield,10))),2)
desc
Now, i’m looking for a tutorial/guide about custom scoring on solr (i’m using
solr 4.5) to implement
Hi Parsi,
Are you sure you are using the same exact parameters? I would include
enhoParams=all and compare parameters. Only wt parameter would be different.
wt=javabin for solrJ
On Thursday, November 28, 2013 11:42 AM, Prasi S prasi1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We recently saw a behavior which
Hi
Managed to get it working by adding -Djute.maxbuffer=5242880 to
zkServer.sh, zkCli.sh and solr startup command.
Please let me know if this value for jute.maxbuffer is within acceptable
limits
Regards
Puneet
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 6:40 AM, Puneet Pawaia puneet.paw...@gmail.comwrote:
I am
In my case I have:
- Zookeeper: a file into conf folder named zookeeper-env.sh with:
#!/usr/bin/env bash
ZOO_ENV=-Djute.maxbuffer=10485761
The zookeeper-env.sh is loaded automatically by the zkEnv.sh if the file
exists.
- Solr: the -Djute.maxbuffer=10485761 param in start command
--
Hi Erick
Could you please let me know what information you require to reach the root of
this problem. I will provide you the same.
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 7:56 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Hi Yago,
Since the value you have mentioned is less than what I have used and it is
working, I won't rock the boat.
Thanks for the env.sh direction. I'll use it next time I need to set things
up.
Regards
Puneet
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Yago Riveiro yago.rive...@gmail.comwrote:
In my
Hi Ahmet,
Now things are making sense.Thank you for your reply.
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Hars,
Highlighted text samples are matching because of
WordDelimiterFilterFactory splits them. You can see/test the behaviour of
your fieldType
I use Sol 4.5.1. Let's assume that I have a dynamic field at my schema.
I've indexed some documents into my cloud. After a time later can I remove
some fields (I know their names) from my index without re-indexing?
Hi Colm/Yaan,
Based on the comments in the support ticket it seems vjoin has some constraints
like
I.from and to keys need to be integer whereas in our
case these essentially be string values
II. Join needs to be happen between multiple cores, in our
case
Why? You can just stop loading them with lazy load. Is it about space?
On 28 Nov 2013 18:56, Furkan KAMACI furkankam...@gmail.com wrote:
I use Sol 4.5.1. Let's assume that I have a dynamic field at my schema.
I've indexed some documents into my cloud. After a time later can I remove
some
Howdy,
Is there any way to specify a time zone per field/facet? There is a
global TZ query parameter, but I would like to be able to use a
different TZ for different fields or facets in a query.
Thx,
- Bram
Hello everyone,
I have problems with setting up SolrCloud to work with term vectors,
failing with error:
lst name=error
str name=trace
java.lang.NullPointerException at
org.apache.solr.handler.component.TermVectorComponent.finishStage(TermVectorComponent.java:437)
at
It works just as I wanted, thanks !!
Paule
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-4-x-how-to-implement-an-update-processor-chain-working-for-partial-updates-tp4103071p4103738.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
The problem is that: I want a field that should have payloads (I have other
usual fields too). I want to calculate usual document score and if a match
occurs at payloaded field I want to add payload to the document score too.
However I could not see any working example and I could not get any
Hi Alexandre,
Reading comments on SOLR-5395, I don't fully understand how the whole update
processing is performed (what exactly happens on which data). if you have
some time to explain that would be very nice.
Thanks
Paule
--
View this message in context:
For instance,When we searched for “Kredit” and received hits containing the
words “Kredit”, “Kredite” and “Kredit-“. However, entries containing the
word “Kreditgeber” are not coming up in the results list. Would you know
why?
Regards
Viresh Modi
Dear solr
I have a question that solr index relocation can throughput of network? How to
config ,I find not in solrconfig about ReplicationHandler.
Eagerly waiting for your answer , thanks very much!
The question:
¿Is there a way to avoid field expansion when adding
flhttp://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters#flparameter to
the request?
The environment:
Solr 4.4 using the next schema.xml
field name=id type=string indexed=true stored=true required=true
/
field name=01_text
Hi Viresh,
It all about analysis (field type) of the text you are indexing searching.
http://localhost:8983/solr/#/collection1/analysis page is very helpful to
obverse/debug how your text is indexed analyzed. It is probably because of your
stemmer. Can you paste your field type definition?
Declaration:
field name=content type=text_en_splitting indexed=true
stored=true termVectors=true termPositions=true termOffsets=true /
My Field Type Defination as below:
fieldType name=text_en_splitting class=solr.TextField
positionIncrementGap=100 autoGeneratePhraseQueries=true
analyzer
Viresh,
there's two ways to solve this.
- Using the CompoundWordsAnalyzer. I still haven't been able to find an easy to
embark method into there. That would decompose, at indexing and query time, the
term Kreditgeber into kredit and geber. For a higher precision, you probably
want to do it at
I would like to perform searches in Solr using queries I extracted from Fast
ESP . The queries are written in FQL (fast query language) format and I
want to convert them to Solr query syntax . Is there any way to preform a
search like this in Solr? Maybe a tool available? Could not find anything
Hi Alvaro,
That's really weird. When choosing field names it is recommend to use java
variable naming conventions.
Can you change field names to text_01 , text01 and try again? Problem still
exists?
Do you have dynamicField definitions? What happens when you request all fields
(fl=*)?
On
If you have chosen to use improper field names, then in the fl parameter you
need to reference them using the field function:
fl=id,field(01text)
The basic concept is that Solr doesn't ban improper field names, but that
they don't work in all contexts.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original
I use Solr 4.5.1 I have a configuration from Solr 4.3. When I start my Solr
I get that exception:
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Could not load config for
solrconfig.xml
at
org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer.createFromLocal(CoreContainer.java:919)
at
A long version of error log:
3756 [coreLoadExecutor-3-thread-1] ERROR org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer
- Unable to create core: collection1
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error opening new searcher
at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.init(SolrCore.java:821)
at
Done for the Solr wiki, but not Confluence.
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hello all,
Please add my username ( iorixxx ) to Contributors Group. With this, can
I edit confluence too?
Done for the Solr wiki
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Shinichiro Abe
shinichiro.ab...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
Please add my username ( shinichiro ) to Contributors Group.
Thanks in advance,
Shinichiro Abe
Hi all!
I have a question regarding boolean queries. What I want to reach:
Return all documents where string-field „access has value ‚allow*‘ or is not
set.
My query:
fq = (access:Allow*) OR (-access:*)
But I got only the results where the field has value ‚allow*‘.
I am using solr 4.3.1 with
AFAIK you should have 4.5 just like in my config used to be (4.6 in my
case), check for the obvious, no spaces (or hidden spaces), etc.
luceneMatchVersion4.6/luceneMatchVersion
Also, it looks like your Solr hasn't been upgraded properly, if you
verify the list of supported versions it should
Thanks for letting us know this is an issue with discovery mode
as well, I'd only run across old-style before.
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 2:53 AM, lansing
halim.cha...@wantedanalytics.comwrote:
Thank you for your replies,
I am using the new-style discovery
It worked after adding this setting :
I'm not quite sure what you're asking here. By sorting
you're really making scoring irrelevant. Do you want
to implement your sorting function in a custom scorer and
do away with the sort clause?
Best,
Erick
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 5:00 AM, Viva Daniele viva.dani...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi guys,
Thanks for your answers. The problem with the use of the field function is
that it only works for non multivalued fields.
Regards.
El 28/11/2013 15:54, Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.com escribió:
If you have chosen to use improper field names, then in the fl parameter
you need to
Ahmet,
Because the Confluence wiki hosts the releasable Solr ref guide, only those who
have signed ICLAs can edit it - this is ASF policy. (Sorry, I can’t find a web
page describing this policy.)
Currently, editing on the Solr space in the Confluence wiki is restricted to
Lucene/Solr
Yeah, purely negative sub-queries have had problems, so rewrite:
fq = (access:Allow*) OR (-access:*)
as
fq = (access:Allow*) OR (*:* -access:*)
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Kurz
Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2013 10:34 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject:
Is solr ignoring parts of the query that dont consider fields.
something like
and(blabla , name: george)
It wont throw an exeption, so what is he considering blablabla to?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-query-syntax-tp4103784.html
Sent from the Solr
Hi Steve,
Thanks for the explanation. I posted my findings to voting threat of
ref-guide-4.6.pdf
Thanks,
Ahmet
On Thursday, November 28, 2013 6:29 PM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote:
Ahmet,
Because the Confluence wiki hosts the releasable Solr ref guide, only those who
have signed
Hi All,
I have an test setup with External Zookeeper and 2 machines with Solr
4.6.0. 2 collections with 2 shards. As such there is no replica at the
moment.
However, when adding records, I am getting the following error
ERROR - 2013-11-28 22:42:26.925;
Hi,
No it does not ignore. debugQuery=on shows actual parsed query.
By the way default query parser does not support prefix AND(a, b, c) notation.
Which query parser are you using?
On Thursday, November 28, 2013 6:50 PM, elmerfudd na...@012.net.il wrote:
Is solr ignoring parts of the query
On 11/28/2013 3:01 AM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
Are you sure you are using the same exact parameters? I would include
enhoParams=all and compare parameters. Only wt parameter would be different.
wt=javabin for solrJ
You can also look at the Solr log, which if you are logging at the
normal level
On 11/28/2013 8:03 AM, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
Caused by: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Invalid luceneMatchVersion
'4.5', valid values are: [LUCENE_30, LUCENE_31, LUCENE_32, LUCENE_33,
LUCENE_34, LUCENE_35, LUCENE_36, LUCENE_40, LUCENE_41, LUCENE_42,
LUCENE_43, LUCENE_CURRENT] or a string
I'm closing this thread on _this_ list (user) and move it as patch proposal to
the dev list.
Thanks for the feedback!
Regards,
Stephan
Von: Müller, Stephan [muel...@ponton-consulting.de]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. November 2013 16:16
An:
Yeah, the documentation is definitely wrong - it definitely doesn't
concatenate the values in a multivalued field, it only uses the first one
like you mentioned.
If you want to detect the language of each of the values in the
multi-valued field (as opposed to specifying multiple separate string
How are you trying to update? This looks like the intra-shard URL,
What's the process by which you attempt to add the docs?
Best,
Erick
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Puneet Pawaia puneet.paw...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi All,
I have an test setup with External Zookeeper and 2 machines with Solr
Please read the link I provided. You have
provided no context for your problem, and
have cut/pasted a fragment that appears
unrelated to anything I've seen in Solr.
Imagine you're entirely ignorant of what
you've attempted to do and someone provided
you with the information you've provided us.
Hi Eric
I am adding documents using curl.
Each document is a single line document containing a few fields which are
generally a few words. Several such documents are stored in a csv file
which is uploaded using curl.
When these files are uploaded to a single node installation, there are no
Hi,
In Japan, revised Apache Solr introduction book is released.
This book revises GijutsuHyohronBook2010, based on Solr 4.5.1.
This book includes Solr 4.x's many features, SolrCloud, and ManifoldCF
features.
See https://wiki.apache.org/solr/GijutsuHyohronBook2013
Thank you,
Shinichiro Abe
Thank you. Is this book available in English?, where can i get it?
Regards,
Raju Shikha
India
-Original Message-
From: Shinichiro Abe [mailto:shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com]
Sent: 29 November 2013 07:52
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc: u...@manifoldcf.apache.org
Subject: ANNOUNCEMENT:
Hi Puneet,
Using curl,
Are you trying in this way?
curl http://localhost:8983/solr/update?commit=true -H Content-Type:
text/xml -d @mem.xml
curl http://localhost:7574/solr/update?commit=true -H Content-Type:
text/xml -d @monitor2.xml
or try using -Durl if it is windows like below,
Hi,
Is this book available in English?, where can i get it?
No, this book is available in Japanese only.
We can get the book from amazon etc.
Regards,
Shinichiro Abe
On 2013/11/29, at 14:20, Raju Shikha raju.shi...@cigniti.com wrote:
Thank you. Is this book available in English?, where can i
55 matches
Mail list logo
