On 2/16/2014 11:34 PM, Nguyen Manh Tien wrote:
> My solr got OOM recently after i upgraded from solr 4.0 to 4.6.1.
> I check heap dump and found that it has many SolrIndexSearcher (SIS)
> objects (24), i expect only 1 SIS because we have 1 core.
>
> I make some experiment
> - Right after start sol
Lucene main file formats actually don't change a lot in 4.x (or even 5.x), and the newer codecs just delegate to previous versions for most file types. The newer file types don't typically include Lucene's version in file names.For example, Lucene 4.6 codes basically delegate stored fields and term
Hello,
My solr got OOM recently after i upgraded from solr 4.0 to 4.6.1.
I check heap dump and found that it has many SolrIndexSearcher (SIS)
objects (24), i expect only 1 SIS because we have 1 core.
I make some experiment
- Right after start solr, it has only 1 SolrIndexSearcher
- *But after i i
On 2/16/2014 7:25 PM, Nguyen Manh Tien wrote:
> I upgraded recently from solr 4.0 to solr 4.6,
> I check solr index folder and found there file
>
> _aars_*Lucene41*_0.doc
> _aars_*Lucene41*_0.pos
> _aars_*Lucene41*_0.tim
> _aars_*Lucene41*_0.tip
>
> I don't know why it don't have *Lucene46* in fi
in solrconfig of my solr 4.3 i have a userdefined requestHandler. i would like
to use fq to force the following conditions:
1: organisations is empty and roles is empty
2: organisations contains one of the commadelimited list in variable $org
3: roles contains one of the commadelimited l
Hello,
I upgraded recently from solr 4.0 to solr 4.6,
I check solr index folder and found there file
_aars_*Lucene41*_0.doc
_aars_*Lucene41*_0.pos
_aars_*Lucene41*_0.tim
_aars_*Lucene41*_0.tip
I don't know why it don't have *Lucene46* in file name.
Is there something wrong?
Thanks,
Tien
Stored fields are what the Solr DocumentCache in solrconfig.xml
is all about.
My general feeling is that stored fields are mostly irrelevant for
search speed, especially if lazy-loading is enabled. The only time
stored fields come in to play is when assembling the final result
list, i.e. the 10 or
Yes it works with Solr
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
> On Feb 16, 2014, at 3:38 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
>
> Does it work with Solr? I couldn't tell what the description was from
> this repo and it's Solr relevance.
>
> I am sure all the long timers know, but for more recent Solr people
Does it work with Solr? I couldn't tell what the description was from
this repo and it's Solr relevance.
I am sure all the long timers know, but for more recent Solr people,
the additional information would be useful.
Regards,
Alex.
Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
LinkedIn: htt
Start with http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPerformanceProblems It has a
section on GC tuning and a link to some example settings.
On 16 Feb 2014 21:19, "lboutros" wrote:
> Thanks a lot for your answer.
>
> Is there a web page, on the wiki for instance, where we could find some JVM
> settings or r
Thanks a lot for your answer.
Is there a web page, on the wiki for instance, where we could find some JVM
settings or recommandations that we should used for Solr with some index
configurations?
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.co
Thanks Tri
*a. Are you docs distributed evenly across shards: number of docs and size
of the shards*
>> Yes the size of all the shards is equal (an ignorable delta in the order
of KB) and so are the # of docs
*b. Is your test client querying all nodes, or all the queries go to those
2 busy nodes
Hello!
Luke 4.6.1 has been just released. Grab it here:
https://github.com/DmitryKey/luke/releases/tag/4.6.1
fixes:
loading the jar from command line is now working fine.
--
Dmitry Kan
Blog: http://dmitrykan.blogspot.com
Twitter: twitter.com/dmitrykan
If only availability is your concern, you can always keep a list of servers
to which your C++ clients will send requests, and round robin amongst them.
If one of the servers go down, you will either not be able to reach it or
get a 500+ error in the HTTP response, you can take it out of circulation
Hi,
I am using MySQL as the datastore and for the last_modified_date use the
java.util.Date. I m seeing that the DIH doesn’t seem to pick records; Is there
a date format that I should use for DIH to compare properly and pick up the
records for indexing?
Thanks
-Peri.S
*** DISCLAIMER *** This
15 matches
Mail list logo