Is there a way to tokenize 12-6-2014 as 12 june 2014 and the other way around
as well?
Making it possible for people to search on text and numbers for dates?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Date-number-to-text-tp4140323.html
Sent from the Solr - User
Hi Shawn,
Thanks for your response, wanted to clarify a few things.
*Does that mean for querying smoothly we need to have memory atleast equal
or greater to the size of index? As in my case the index size will be very
heavy(~2TB) and practically speaking that amount of memory is not possible.
Hey Jack,
Well I have indexed around some 10 Million documents consuming 20 GB index
size.
Each Document is consisting of nearly 100 String Fields with data upto 10
characters per field.
For my case each document containing number of fields can expand much
widely (from current 100 to 500 or ever
Hi,
I created a custom filter for my field named text_reversed, i tried my
custom filter in solr 4.7.1 and i was able to analyse the result, it works
fine but in solr 4.8.1 it gaves me error of : *Missing required parameter:
analysis.fieldvalue. *It is also not working with any field*, *here is
The url forming is
*http://localhost:8984/solr/#/IM-Search/analysis?analysis.query=juteanalysis.fieldname=titleverbose_output=1
http://localhost:8984/solr/#/IM-Search/analysis?analysis.query=juteanalysis.fieldname=titleverbose_output=1*
Here is the screenshot: http://picpaste.com/HrW26A8d.png
On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 12:32 +0200, Vineet Mishra wrote:
*Does that mean for querying smoothly we need to have memory atleast equal
or greater to the size of index?
If you absolutely, positively have to reduce latency as much as
possible, then yes. With an estimated index size of 2TB, I would
Thanks for the help.. But anyway I solved it using RegexTransformer
In the db_link entity I used RegexTransformer and set the link field as:
field column=link regex=^([^#]+) sourceColName=LINK/
and in tika-doc entity I set the Url value as:
${db_link.link}
--
View this message in context:
Hi Toke,
That was Spectacular, really great to hear that you have already indexed
2.7TB+ data to your server and still the query response time is under ms or
a few seconds for such a huge dataset.
Could you state what indexing mechanism are you using, as I started with
EmbeddedSolrServer but it
Hi Vikek,
As everybody in the mail list mentioned to use UIMA you should go for it,
as opennlp issues are not tracking properly, it can make stuck your
development in near future if any issue comes, so its better to start
investigate with uima.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at
On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 14:05 +0200, Vineet Mishra wrote:
Could you state what indexing mechanism are you using, as I started
with EmbeddedSolrServer but it was pretty slow after a few GB(~30+) of
indexing.
I suspect that is due to too-frequent commits, too small heap or
something third,
Hi,
Does this *shards* parameter will also work in near future with solr 5?
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Mahmoud Almokadem prog.mahm...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi, you can search using this sample Url
hi,
I have two docs,
a) aa bb cc and,
b) aa cc bb.
The query is aa bb. What I expected is the doc a comes first with a higher
score than doc b because the term distance in query and that in doc a are more
similar.
After google for a while I get it down with the span query q: aa
Earlier I used to index with HtttpPost Mechanism only, making each post
size specific to 2Mb to 20Mb that was going fine, but we had a suspect that
instead of indexing through network call(which ofcourse results in latency
due to network delays and http protocol) if we can index Offline by just
No, there's no theoretical limit.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 11:20 AM, ku3ia dem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all!
The question is how many collections I can put to one alias, using
SolrCloud
alias collection API
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Collections+API#CollectionsAPI-api4
The main limit is the 1mb zk node limit. But even that can be raised.
- Mark
On Jun 6, 2014, at 6:21 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com
wrote:
No, there's no theoretical limit.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 11:20 AM, ku3ia dem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all!
The question is
we need to have the nested structure for the index, and the requirement is as
follows
we have application at root, then customer location, and then we have some
entities data
Add
doc
applicaton
cust location
Doc
order id
doc
products
/doc
/Doc
DoC
/add
i want to index the data in the above
I’m not sure that’s a bug in the UI .. in case the underlying service is
barking with an exception we can’t do anything else than showing to you.
are you sure the custom filter works as expected? like, verified with a
unit-test or something along the lines? i can still work with the examples
Hi,
An application I am working on indexes documents to a Solr index. This Solr
index is setup as a single node, without any replication. This index is
running Solr 4.5.0.
We have noticed an issue lately that is causing some problems for our
application. The problem is that we add/update a
On 6/6/2014 2:32 AM, O. Klein wrote:
Is there a way to tokenize 12-6-2014 as 12 june 2014 and the other way around
as well?
Making it possible for people to search on text and numbers for dates?
Dates in Solr (if you use an actual date field, and not a text field)
follow strict interpretation
On 6/6/2014 6:25 AM, Aman Tandon wrote:
Does this *shards* parameter will also work in near future with solr 5?
I am not aware of any plan to deprecate or remove the shards parameter.
My personal experience is with versions from 1.4.0 through 4.7.2. It
works in all of those versions. Without
The parse date update processor can be used to parse dates in a number of
formats (configurable) and convert to a Java date value:
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/4_8_1/solr-core/org/apache/solr/update/processor/ParseDateFieldUpdateProcessorFactory.html
You could copy the field to another field
Thanks shawn.
In my organisation we also want to implement the solrcloud, but the problem
is that, we are using the master-slave architecture and on master we do all
indexing, architecture of master is lower than the slaves.
So if we implement the solrcloud in a fashion that master will be the
Thanks shawn.
In my organisation we also want to implement the solrcloud, but the problem
is that, we are using the master-slave architecture and on master we do all
indexing, architecture of master is lower than the slaves.
So if we implement the solrcloud in a fashion that master will be the
On 6/6/2014 8:31 AM, Aman Tandon wrote:
In my organisation we also want to implement the solrcloud, but the problem
is that, we are using the master-slave architecture and on master we do all
indexing, architecture of master is lower than the slaves.
So if we implement the solrcloud in a
Thanks shawn i will try to think in that way too :)
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 6/6/2014 8:31 AM, Aman Tandon wrote:
In my organisation we also want to implement the solrcloud, but the
problem
is that, we are using the
Good morning Solr compatriots,
I'm using Solr4.0Final and I have synonyms.txt in my schema (only at query
time) like so:
fieldType name=text_general class=solr.TextField
positionIncrementGap=100
analyzer type=index
tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/
filter
It is not working with either custom filter/field as well as with normal
text field, it only working fine if i pass the value/text in the both in
the index time input as well as in query time input.
Only query time analysis is impossible unless i wrote that extra parameter
On 6/6/2014 9:08 AM, eShard wrote:
However, when I try to call my /elevate handler; the synonyms are factored
in but none of the results say [elevated]=true
I'm assuming this is because the elevation must be an exact match and the
synonyms are expanding it beyond that so elevation is thwarted.
I think I created this problem in SOLR-6023.
I went with the javadoc documentation which says that analysis.value is a
required parameter and added that check. It seems that the either
analysis.value or analysis.q (or q) can be specified to make it work. I'll
fix in 4.9
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at
Okay thanks shalin, i am fine with explicit till 4.9 :)
So i don't need to open the issue right?
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
shalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
I think I created this problem in SOLR-6023.
I went with the javadoc documentation
Hi,
We are running Solr cloud 4.8.0 on tomcat 7, java 7 update 51, with 5 shards
and 3 replicas.
When I try to create alias via collection admin api
http://10.0.5.227:8201/solr/admin/collections?action=CREATEALIASname=Currentcollections=Current2
It timeout after 180 s,
181344574
Yes, please do open an issue. I'll fix it there.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 9:33 PM, Aman Tandon amantandon...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay thanks shalin, i am fine with explicit till 4.9 :)
So i don't need to open the issue right?
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Shalin
Reposting this from jira ticket to users list:
I'm noticing a very weird bug using the CollapsingQParserPlugin. We tried
to use this plugin when we realized that faceting on the groups would take
a ridiculous amount of time. To its credit, it works very quickly, however
the facet counts that it
The CollapsingQParserPlugin should give you the same facet counts as
group.truncate.
You're using group.facets, which the CollapsingQParserplugin doesn't yet
support. I think this would be an excellent feature, so we could make a
jira ticket to add this feature.
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at
Yes, a collection API can timeout particularly when a long running
collection operation is running. The collection API tasks are executed
serially right now so new tasks get stuck behind an old one until it
completes. This is going to change in the next release (4.9) with SOLR-5681
which makes the
I've been attempting to experiment with the recently updated Solr Scale
Tool Kit mentioned here:
http://searchhub.org/2014/06/03/introducing-the-solr-scale-toolkit/
After making the very well documented configuration changes at AWS and
installing Python, I was able to use the toolkit to connect
I may be misunderstanding the problem, but if it’s what I think it is, then
users can work-around this now quite easily by using Solr faceting’s
ability to exclude a named/tagged filter query:
q=classIDs:12
fl=PrSKU
fq={!collapse tag=collapse field=PrSKU}
facet=true
facet.field={!
Hi,
How come query aa bb returns document b?
On Friday, June 6, 2014 3:48 PM, 郑华斌 huabin.zh...@qq.com wrote:
hi,
I have two docs,
a) aa bb cc and,
b) aa cc bb.
The query is aa bb. What I expected is the doc a comes first with a higher
score than doc b because the term distance in
Bumping the thread to see if anyone has a solution.
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Ethan eh198...@gmail.com wrote:
Wildcard search do work on multiValued field. I was able to pull up
records for following multiValued field -
Code : [
12344,
4534,
674
]
q=Code:45* fetched the correct
Hi Ethan,
It is hard to understand your example. Can you re-write it? Using xml?
On Friday, June 6, 2014 9:07 PM, Ethan eh198...@gmail.com wrote:
Bumping the thread to see if anyone has a solution.
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Ethan eh198...@gmail.com wrote:
Wildcard search do work
With tag and exclude you can get the facets counts for the collapsed set
and expanded set in the same query. But group.facets is a different count
then either of those.
group.facets counts each facet bucket once per group.
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at
Hi,
I think you need to select * in deltaImportQuery. You are just selecting one
field for both delta*Query SQL sentences.
On Thursday, June 5, 2014 3:34 PM, ajay59 ajay.gup...@wipro.com wrote:
Hi,
We are using the SOLR 4.6 version and trying to implement Delta import
functionality .On
Anyone folks?
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 10:25 AM, S.L simpleliving...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Folks,
I recently started using the spellchecker in my solrconfig.xml. I am able
to build up an index in Solr.
But,if I ever shutdown tomcat I am not able to restart it.The server never
spits out the
I would try a thread dump and check the output to see what`s going on.
You could also strace the process if you`re running on Unix or changed the log
level in Solr to get more information logged
-Original Message-
From: S.L [mailto:simpleliving...@gmail.com]
Sent: June-06-14 2:33 PM
This looks distinctly related to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4408 , try coldSearcher = true
as being suggested in JIRA and let us know .
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Jean-Sebastien Vachon
jean-sebastien.vac...@wantedanalytics.com wrote:
I would try a thread dump and check
Hi,
I wonder how to secure Solr with Kerberos.
We can Kerberos secure Solr by configuring the AuthenticationFilter from
the hadoop-auth.jar that is packaged in solr.war.
But after we do that,
1) How does a SolrJ client connect to the secured Solr server?
2) In SolrCloud environment, how one
Solr version on remote server: solr-4.3.1 I am trying to use Solr Realtime
Get http://wiki.apache.org/solr/RealTimeGet to retrieve document before
commit. My code
class Test3
{
static main(args)
{
def test = new Test3()
test.run()
}
private run()
{
String url =
Ronald: I'm having a little trouble understading the steps o reproduce
that you are describing -- in particular Step 1 f ii because i'm not
really sure i understand what exactly you are putting in mem2.xml
Also: Since you don't appera to be using implicit routing, i'm not clear
on why you
Hello,
I have a query like the following where brand is a field in my schema:
select?rows=1start=0sort=price+ascq=brand:sonyqt=for-searchwt=xml
But I want to do this instead:
select?rows=1start=0sort=price+ascq=brand_name:sonyqt=for-searchwt=xml
and define something like brand_name:brand in
Wildcard, fuzzy, and regex query do work on multivalued fields, but on only
a single value at a time. Your match cannot occur across values.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ethan
Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2014 12:52 PM
To: solr-user
Subject: Re: Multivalue wild card search
Field aliasing exists when retrieving fields via fl parameter. But not when
querying.
Can you elaborate more your use case?
On Saturday, June 7, 2014 12:57 AM, Antoine LE FLOC'H lefl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I have a query like the following where brand is a field in my schema:
Edismax has field aliasing:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtendedDisMax#Field_aliasing_.2F_renaming
f.my_alias.qf=actual_field
f.brand.qf=brand_name
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Antoine LE FLOC'H
Sent: Friday, June 6, 2014 5:56 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
OK thank you.
I wanted to see what's possible if we want to change our Solr query
interface. It is used by client applications. I wanted to see if we can be
backward compatible.
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 12:10 AM, Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.com
wrote:
Edismax has field aliasing:
Oops... for your example it would be:
f.brand_name.qf=brand
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Antoine LE FLOC'H
Sent: Friday, June 6, 2014 6:54 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Mapping a field name before queryParser
OK thank you.
I wanted to see what's
You need to explain what you mean here -- you're using hte term
multiplicitive boost but the context in which you are asking the
question suggests that isn't really applicable.
what does that expression mean to you?
Or to step back and rephrase: What is your usecase? What does your data
look
: My guess is that the customized toolkit AMI (ami-1e6b9d76) at AWS is not
: accessible by my AWS credentials. Is this an AMI permissioning issue or is
: it a problem with my particular account or how it is configured at AWS. I
: did not experience this specific problem when working with the
Thanks, Hoss.
I did substitute the previous AMI ID from the mid-May release of the
toolkit and the build process does proceed further; however, it appears the
the AMI changed enough that it is not compatible with the new toolkit
release. In doing a little more research, I'm inclined to believe
What you are asking for is comparable to saying:
In my index I have a TrieIntField called severity when i search for
severity:8765432 I get results, but when i search for severity:8* i get no
results -- what do i need to change so that this type of query matches
8765432 and 8978 and 84356
Hello,
I am using the following script to index RSS items
dataSource type=URLDataSource encoding=UTF-8 /
document
entity name=slashdot
pk=link
url=http://www.alarabiya.net/.mrss/ar.xml;
processor=XPathEntityProcessor
forEach=/rss/channel/item
59 matches
Mail list logo
