I recompiled my classes with a public constructor and everything goes well.
2014-09-10 22:00 GMT+02:00 Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com:
Francesco:
What was the fix? It'll help others with the same issue.
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 6:53 AM, Francesco Valentini
Hi,
I have 3 languages indexed in the same core. My core contains recipes with
seperate recipe properties on which I use faceting.
Example:
- property dietary: EN: vegetarian, FR: vegetarien, NL: vegetarisch
- property dish: EN: man dish, FR: plat principal, NL: hoofdgerecht
In my q parameter, I
Hello,
I'm facing a issue with field collapsing in a cloud environment.
I can't get the ngroups value with the format simple, but it works just
fine without this parameter.
So basically this one doesn't give me the ngroups value :
I am using SOLR-3.3.0 version with multi-core setup.
We have already perform Full-import to index data from database.
Let assume that we have updated some value in table for set of column
and some how delta-import has missed these update in index due to xyz
reason.
In that case we have run
Hi James, hi list,
I can confirm the existence of data that's within
1 Levenshtein step from ichtscheiben:
{
responseHeader: {
status: 0,
QTime: 0,
params: {
fl: name,spell,
indent:
true,
q: name:Sichtscheiben,
_: 1410423419758,
wt:
json,
rows: 50
}
},
response: {
numFound: 6,
Anyone?
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Salman Akram
salman.ak...@northbaysolutions.net wrote:
So realistically speaking you cannot have SolrCloud work for 2 data
centers as a redundant solution because no matter how many nodes you add
you still would need at least 1 node in the 2nd center
Hi, please help me to figure out what's wrong with this query:
http://pastie.org/pastes/9544433/text?key=v9favzj2ulcaq0qvorda
Without cache=false and cost it takes more than 15 seconds. What's weird
type:Award::Nomination takes a few milliseconds when created_at_d:[* TO
2014-09-08T23:59:59Z]
q and logical operators.
Hi all,
I have a strange problem which seems to stomp my google-fu skills.
We have a webshop which has a solr based search mechanism which allows
customers to search for products based on a range of different fields,
including item numbers. I recently added a feature
Hi Chris,
But it seems this has not fixed in 4.10, as the issue SOLR-6179
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6179 is not in changes list
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/4_10_0/changes/Changes.html
~Thanks
Joe
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:08 AM, Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.org
wrote:
Fields:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/file/n4158178/Screenshot_836.png
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/file/n4158178/Screenshot_837.png
Schema:
http://pastie.org/pastes/9544427/text?key=974npslxxalvewhlyc4mg
Query debug output:
On 9/9/2014 9:20 AM, Salman Akram wrote:
So realistically speaking you cannot have SolrCloud work for 2 data centers
as a redundant solution because no matter how many nodes you add you still
would need at least 1 node in the 2nd center working too.
Precisely.
So that just leaves with
Thomas,
Yes, you are right about the problem being with the beginning of the word
needing correction. If you are using DirectSolrSpellChecker, you need to set
the minPrefix parameter to 0. Otherwise the default (1) requires the first
character to match for it to try and correct it.
See
On 9/11/2014 2:30 AM, Dharmendra Jaiswal wrote:
I am using SOLR-3.3.0 version with multi-core setup.
We have already perform Full-import to index data from database.
Let assume that we have updated some value in table for set of column
and some how delta-import has missed these update in index
Working now - fyi - the update/extract from a post works extracting from a
kmz(zip) but I am still having trouble from the dataimport. I'll move to
another thread for that. THANKS all.
--
View this message in context:
Hello All,
I am using SolrCloud for my project ( Using Azure ) and it was working fine
on my development machine but i am getting following errors from couple of
days.
---Error - Parent /overseer/queue missing for /overseer/queue/
I am relatively new to SolrCloud and have no idea as to why
FYI, I searched the google for this problem but didn't find any satisfactory
answer.Here is the current situation : I have the 8 shards in my solr cloud
backed up with 3 zookeeper all are setup on AWS EC2 instances, all 8 are leader
with no replicas.I have only 1 collection say collection1
Hi ,
I am trying to see how the External File Field functionality works.
In the solrconfig.xml, I added below listeners.
listener event=newSearcher class=org.apache.solr.schema.
ExternalFileFieldReloader/
listener event=firstSearcher class=org.apache.solr.schema.
ExternalFileFieldReloader/
The way this is done in drupal and probably many others is that the facet
fields are keywords from a taxonomy.
If you want to facet through single language, you probably want to separate the
fields where you index each of the languages (so a field text-en, text-ft
through which you would facet.
Not sure of the right place to bring this up, so figured I'd start here with
the mailing list. At the very least this information may prove useful to
anyone else that may encounter these issues. (Solution is to use Tomcat 8)
I've been experiencing frequent Tomcat core dumps during heavy
hey guys,
I'm running a solrcloud cluster consisting of five nodes. My largest index
contains 2.5 million documents and occupies about 6 gigabytes of disk
space. We recently switched to the latest solr version (4.10) from version
4.4.1 which we ran successfully for about a year without any major
I wonder if Solr works with ActiveMQ. We successfully use Solr with
newSearcher listener event utilizing Fioranno JMS and Tomcat 7.0.35. I try
to update solrconfig.xml to use ActiveMQ to no avail. The followings are
settings for Fioranno (OK) and ActiveMQ (Not OK):
listener event=newSearcher
: But it seems this has not fixed in 4.10, as the issue SOLR-6179
: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6179 is not in changes list
: http://lucene.apache.org/solr/4_10_0/changes/Changes.html
there was a jira glitch recording the commits, but tim added a comment
with the details.
it is
Probably need to look at it running with a profiler to see what's up.
Here's a few additional flags that might help the GC work better for
you (which is not to say there isn't a leak somewhere):
-XX:MaxTenuringThreshold=8 -XX:CMSInitiatingOccupancyFraction=40
This should lead to a nice
Lucas,
Thanks for the information. I took the dictionary and used hunspell
stemmer. It worked for the use-case I had mentioned, i.e. posunout and
posunulo. But, it had an impact on other search terms. For e.g. a search
term ukončit or ukončí is not returning any result, though they work
with
Solr works fine with ActiveMQ provided a good solrconfig.xml. I was omitting
the required property java.naming.provider.url.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-and-ActiveMQ-tp4158266p4158336.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at
I have an index of books in Solr. I copy all the fields to a field called
text and search on it i.e. in my schema.xml I have:
copyField source=* dest=text/
Then in my solrconfig.xml (similar to the velocity example in
example\example-DIH\solr\db) I use the edismax
If you look at your shards individually, I'll be that you'll find a
slight difference in the number of deleted docs. You can add
distrib=false to the query and it will be entirely served on a single
node.
Indexes will be slightly different on various shards due to differing
merges, and my theory
just skimmed, but:
bq: I would get a hit for vis dis dur, but vis dur dis no longer
returns anything. This is not an option for me
Would slop help here? i.e. vis dur dis~3 or some such?
Best
Erick
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 4:34 AM, John Nielsen j...@mcb.dk wrote:
q and logical operators.
Hi
Um, I really think this is pretty likely to not be a great solution.
When you say merge indexes, I'm thinking you want to go from 8
shards to 1 shard. Now, this can be done with the merge indexes core
admin API, see:
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/MergingSolrIndexes
BUT.
1 This will break all
Just as an FYI, You may want to try Sentence Detection Tokenizer added as
OpenNLP capabilities to Solr 4.9
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2899
-Original Message-
From: Susheel Kumar [mailto:susheel.ku...@thedigitalgroup.net]
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2014 8:29 PM
To:
Hi All,
Sorry for the delayed response.
I was out of office for last few days and was not able to reply.
Thanks for the information.
We have a use case were one sentence is the unit token with which we need
to do normalization and semantic analyzer.
We need to finalize on the type of normalizer
31 matches
Mail list logo
