Thank you very much for your guides but how can I run solr server inside
eclipse?
Best regards.
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Rajani Maski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The best tutorial for setting up Solr[solr 4.7] in eclipse/intellij is
> documented in Solr In Action book, Apendix A, *Working with the
Hello Fasial,
It's convenient to use wt=csv to verify block layout (make sue that rows=
is high enough). Note, every span of children should be followed by parent.
see
http://blog.griddynamics.com/2013/12/grandchildren-and-siblings-with-block.html
Putting BRAND_s: clause into the {! which= } is ab
Erick,
I have upgraded to SolrCloud 4.10.1 with the same toplogy , 3 shards and 2
replication factor with six cores altogether.
Unfortunately , I still see the issue of intermittently no results being
returned.I am not able to figure out whats going on here, I have included
the logging informatio
There's the CheckIndex tool, but I don't know whether it checks this case.
Is there any way you could check this against 4.10.1? I know there
were a couple of edge cases that were fixed in that release, but have
no idea whether block joins were affected.
But other than that, I'm clueless.
Erick
Unless some of the folks poke holes in my approach, all the pieces
should be in the 5.0 release.
It certainly will _not_ be in 4.10.2 (if there is one). Point releases
like that are usually for major bugs (and, very occasionally) a
must-have feature. This wouldn't make that cut
On Mon, Oct 13
*totalprovidencevideo
It worked, thanks, u helped me to save nearly a week on reindexing and lot
of nerves.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Index-to-Helio-Search-tp4163446p4164114.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks Erick,
I am using the 4.10.0 solr. To update any field, I first delete all
existing documents matching _root_:id before inserting the updated version.
So, I don't think that's causing the problem.
Is there a way to validate the sanity of the index, are there any tools
which can analyze the
Thanks for the info. I will wait for the next release then. Will it come with
4.10.2?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Manual-leader-election-in-SolrCloud-tp4164047p4164115.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
To correct myself, the selected Similarity class can have a computeNorm
method that calculates the "norm" value that will be stored in the index
when the document is indexed, so changing the Similarity class will require
reindexing if the implementation of the computeNorm method is different.
What version of Solr? For Block Join you need to index all the docs
(parent/child) docs at once, and when they're updated they _all_ need
to be updated AFAIK.
Best,
Erick
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Faisal Mansoor
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am having problems running Parent Block Join Query in Solr
I think it's just cruft I left in and never ended up using anywhere. You can
ignore it.
- Mark
> On Oct 13, 2014, at 8:42 PM, Martin Grotzke
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> can anybody tell me the meaning of ZkStateReader.SYNC? All other state
> related constants are clear to me, I'm only not sure abo
Hi,
can anybody tell me the meaning of ZkStateReader.SYNC? All other state
related constants are clear to me, I'm only not sure about the semantics
of SYNC.
Background: I'm working on an async solr client
(https://github.com/inoio/solrs) and want to add SolrCloud support - for
this I'm reusing Zk
Hi,
I am having problems running Parent Block Join Query in Solr. For some
reasons the following query throws ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException.
{!type=parent which='type_s:(shirt) AND BRAND_s:(Puma)'}
(type_s:(sku) AND SIZE_s:(XL))
The index I am using is not that big, only has a few hundred entr
Hi,
I have a question about UnInvertedField internals. I use it for multi terms
field faceting. And once got an exception "Too many values for UnInvertedField
faceting on field ...". I googled it a bit
(http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.lucene.solr.user/68000) and
looked into the co
Yes, if the replacing similarity has a different implementation on norms, you
should reindex or gradually update all documents within decent time.
-Original message-
> From:Ahmet Arslan
> Sent: Thursday 9th October 2014 18:27
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: does one
Not to my knowledge. There's quite a bit of work going on around
leader balancing, see the umbrella issue at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6491.
That work won't quite do what you want in the sense that you can't say
"nodeX you become the leader" though. The way that set of operations
Is it possible to elect the leader manually in SOLR Cloud 4.10.1?
-Sachin-
On 10/13/2014 11:43 AM, nabil Kouici wrote:
> Thank you for this replay. I don't understand why solr load my shard in
> physical memory before becoming available. Is it related to LRU cache
> management?
Just like with the optimize, this also sounds like something that Solr
would never do. If y
Thank you for this replay. I don't understand why solr load my shard in
physical memory before becoming available. Is it related to LRU cache
management?
Regards,Nabil.
Le Lundi 13 octobre 2014 16h20, Shawn Heisey a écrit
:
On 10/13/2014 1:15 AM, nabil Kouici wrote:
> This gives me
Of course there will be performance and memory changes. The only
real question is whether your situation can tolerate them. The whole
point of maxBooleanClauses is exactly that going above that limit
should be a conscious decision because it has implications for
both memory and performance
That sa
Hi,
The best tutorial for setting up Solr[solr 4.7] in eclipse/intellij is
documented in Solr In Action book, Apendix A, *Working with the Solr
codebase*
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe <
tomasflo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The way I do this:
> From a terminal:
> svn checkou
hi,
Can we quantify the impact on SOLR memory usage/performance if we increase
the boolean clause. I am currently using lot of OR clauses in the query
(close to 10K) and can see heap size growing.
Thanks,
Ankit
Hi,
bq. setting non-zero for dates/ints/longs does not
I am not 100% sure, but position increment gap is set to 1 for
FieldMaskingSpanQuery to work.
On Monday, October 13, 2014 5:37 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
wrote:
On 13 October 2014 10:08, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> I don't think it needs to be
Thanks for a quick response Jack.
Trying to escape it with a backslash, we also need to escape the whitespace. Is
that a default behavior while escaping special characters?
eg:
Search query: pcta \- all
No results returned
+(((name_starts_with:pcta^9.0 |
name_parts_starts_with:pcta^6.0 | s_det
Simply escape it with a backslash or enclose the term in quotes.
Sure, it would be nice to be able to configure various operators to be
disabled, but that's not fesible with query parser designed around static
grammars and infleexible tools such as JFlex.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Messa
Can the default behavior of "-" as a pre-fix operator be changed so it can be
searched as a string?
Thanks,
On Oct 9, 2014, at 8:34 AM, Lanke,Aniruddha wrote:
> Is there a way to override this default behavior?
>
> — Lanke
>
> On Oct 8, 2014, at 4:55 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
>
>> Hyphen i
Interesting question - if you construct a multivalued field of non-tokenized
values, can you use a Lucene phrase query to match sequences of numeric
values? Seems like it should work!
Although, you couldn't write a quoted phrase of numeric values in most of
the query parsers since they depend
On 13 October 2014 10:08, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> I don't think it needs to be defined, but it can be thought of as
> helpful to explicitly state a value in the example even if that value is
> in fact the default, so a new user doesn't have to wonder what the value
> is on those field types.
I thi
On 10/13/2014 5:28 AM, Apoorva Gaurav wrote:
> Is it preferable to use CloudSolrServer or using an external load balancer
> like haproxy. We're currently channeling all our requests via haproxy but
> want to get rid of management hassles as well as additional network call
> but saw a significant de
On 10/13/2014 1:15 AM, nabil Kouici wrote:
> This gives me a good understanding. However, I think that slowness in
> start-up in my case is due to segmentation. Before restarting my index
> contains 42 segments with 30GB. After restarting, index is in one segment
> with 22GB. So, I think that sh
On 10/13/2014 12:54 AM, SolrUser1543 wrote:
> I want to monitor my solr cache efficiency :
> Filter cache , queryresultcache, fieldvaluecache.
>
> This information available on plugin/stats page for specific core.
>
> How can I get this information via Rest ?
The same way the admin UI does.
On 10/12/2014 8:33 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
> Thanks Jack, this makes sense for text.
>
> But what about for the ints, dates, and floats? The package web page
> does not seem to say anything. And your book (at least in my release
> 7) is also only talking about the text field. Yet, we seem
I haven't seen any activity regarding this in Jira, just curious if it
would be looked into anytime soon...
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Phil Black-Knight <
pblackkni...@globalgiving.org> wrote:
> see the ticket here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6579
>
> including a patch to
Apoorva,
I was facing same problem few days back when i started useing
*CloudSolrServer*, it decreased my latency by almost 5 times than
HttpSolrServer .. below are few things i did for performance improvement.
+ Start using ConcurrentUpdateSolrServer
+ LB also choking the n/w in high tra
Hello All,
Is it preferable to use CloudSolrServer or using an external load balancer
like haproxy. We're currently channeling all our requests via haproxy but
want to get rid of management hassles as well as additional network call
but saw a significant degradation in latency on switching to
Clou
You can always give the relative path from your current working directory
like below:
~/solr/example/exampledocs$ java -jar post.jar ./../sourcepdf/*.pdf
This solves your issue?
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 3:58 PM, bharath Raghavendran
wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> I am currently using solr-4.9.0 to index my P
Hi ,
I am currently using solr-4.9.0 to index my PDF's using the default
post.jar , start.jar provided in the examples directory.
However i would like to modify the indexed path from absolute location to
relative path from the base folder.
Example :
Absolute Path : E:\myFolder\level1\level11\my
Thanks, found the problem and fixed my writer
2014-10-09 2:00 GMT+02:00 Chris Hostetter :
>
> : i try to add documents to the index and boost them (hole document) but i
> : get this error message:
> :
> : ERROR org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore –
> : org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error parsi
Hi Shawn,
This gives me a good understanding. However, I think that slowness in start-up
in my case is due to segmentation. Before restarting my index contains 42
segments with 30GB. After restarting, index is in one segment with 22GB. So, I
think that shard unavailability is coming from optimi
39 matches
Mail list logo
