On 1/29/2015 12:08 AM, Clemens Wyss DEV wrote:
Thx Shawn. I am running latest-greatest Solr (4.10.3)
Solr home is e.g.
/opt/webs/siteX/WebContent/WEB-INF/solr
the core(s) reside in
/opt/webs/siteX/WebContent/WEB-INF/solr/cores
Should these be found by core discovery?
If not, how can I
Why are solr*jars not being built? All others (including lucene) are built.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Clemens Wyss DEV [mailto:clemens...@mysign.ch]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Januar 2015 13:47
An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: AW: Building Solr 5 from svn sources
Thx!
On 1/29/2015 12:13 AM, Clemens Wyss DEV wrote:
BTW:
None of my core folders contains a core.properties file ... ? Could it be due
to the fact that I am (so far) running only EmbeddedSolrServer, hence no real
Solr-Server?
I'm not sure how it's working without core.properties files, unless
to put your solr home inside the extracted WAR
We are NOT using war's
coreRootDirectory
I don't have this property in my sorl.xml
If there will only be core.properties files in that cores directory
Again, I see no core.properties file. I am creating my cores through
CoreContainer.createCore(
ant package in the solr directory will generate the distribution
tars. That's the ultimate build.
Regards,
Alex.
Sign up for my Solr resources newsletter at http://www.solr-start.com/
On 29 January 2015 at 12:12, Shawn Heisey apa...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 1/29/2015 10:03 AM, Clemens
In the README it only says ant compile, so I was expecting to get the
solr*jars from this task.
ant jar does the trick, what else ;)
Sorry for the noise ...
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Shawn Heisey [mailto:apa...@elyograg.org]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Januar 2015 18:13
An:
No cores-element in my solr.xml
My folder structure looks alike:
[solr]
-solr.xml
-[configsets]
...
-[cores]
--[de]
---[data]
...
--[fr]
...
--[it]
...
So you say, if I copy an empty core.proerties file into the [cores] folder it
should work? Even with 4.10.3?
Thanks also for all your warnings
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6718
looks like I am not alone with my weird questions/ideas ;)
And I should really switch over to 5 ;)
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Clemens Wyss DEV [mailto:clemens...@mysign.ch]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Januar 2015 08:08
An:
Hi,
I want to add solr source to eclipse by link instruction:
http://wise.99acres.com/tutorials/tutorial-solr-code-run-from-eclipse-wtp-tomcat/,
but cannot success. (fail at step 7)
This is error message
C:\Users\anhletung\Downloads\solr-4.10.0-src\solr-4.10.0\build.xml:111: The
foll
owing error
Looks like trunk is Solr 6?
Should I build Solr 5 from
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/branch_5x
Yes, trunk is now for 6.0.
branch_5x is for 5.1.
5.0 release branch is lucene_solr_5_0
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-dev/201501.mbox/%3CCAKiERN4-qbj7BF%3DJgui4xUFKujwuP%2BodkZPesVT51xnXG1om_w%40mail.gmail.com%3E
2015-01-29 19:29 GMT+09:00 Clemens Wyss DEV clemens...@mysign.ch:
Hi,
The error message impossible to resolve dependencies suggests dependency
problems.
seems to be problems at ant ivy-bootstrap (step 6)
Try step 6 again and check logs...
Regards,
Tomoko
2015-01-29 18:14 GMT+09:00 L� T�ng Anh letunganh28121...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I want to add solr source to
Thx!
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Tomoko Uchida [mailto:tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Januar 2015 13:39
An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Building Solr 5 from svn sources
Yes, trunk is now for 6.0.
branch_5x is for 5.1.
5.0 release branch is
On 1/29/2015 10:03 AM, Clemens Wyss DEV wrote:
Why are solr*jars not being built? All others (including lucene) are built.
What steps are you taking, and what is not there that you expect to be
there?
Thanks,
Shawn
For working locally (i.e. not distributing a package) I always use ant
example (although
this target may be changed).
ant dist gives me jars to link against for SolrJ programs.
FWIW,
Erick
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch arafa...@gmail.com
wrote:
ant package in the solr
I would recommend 'ant server' instead. 'and example' is not recommended
anymore as that target is on track for removal.
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com
wrote:
For working locally (i.e. not distributing a package) I always use ant
example (although
I have not trivial task and want to understand if Solr is right instrument to
solve it . Simplified example: i have search field on my site for searching
by product description. and next descriptions in mysql db:
Id Desc
1 this is my test document number one. also checking search within
Thank you, James, I'll do that.
ResponseBuilder carries around with it the QParser, Query, and query
string, so getting suggestions from parsed query terms shouldn't be a big
deal. What looks to be hard is rewriting the original query with the
suggestions. That's probably why the regex is used
Hi Erick,
@ichattopadhyaya beat me to it already yesterday. So we are good
-cheers
Vijay
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com
wrote:
Vijay:
Thanks for reporting this back! Could I ask you to post a new patch with
your correction? Please use the same
Hi Sylkaalex,
Sounds like auto-complete stuff.
http://blog.trifork.com/2012/02/15/different-ways-to-make-auto-suggestions-with-solr/
Ahmet
On Thursday, January 29, 2015 4:37 PM, sylkaalex sylkaa...@gmail.com wrote:
I have not trivial task and want to understand if Solr is right instrument to
Hi,
You can create one sing uuid : https://wiki.apache.org/solr/UniqueKey
Alternatively, you can combine multiple fields from your table to create a key.
TemplateTransformer would be handy. It could be done in select statement too.
Ahmet
On Thursday, January 29, 2015 9:27 AM,
I do ant package because I want to have identical file system layout
to the final distribution. Is there a target that does that? In my
attempts to find it, all other targets had jars, etc all over the
place.
But that's my use-case, not OP's. So, possibly not relevant.
Regards,
Alex.
On 1/29/2015 10:15 AM, Clemens Wyss DEV wrote:
to put your solr home inside the extracted WAR
We are NOT using war's
coreRootDirectory
I don't have this property in my sorl.xml
If there will only be core.properties files in that cores directory
Again, I see no core.properties file. I am
On 1/29/2015 12:05 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
I do ant package because I want to have identical file system layout
to the final distribution. Is there a target that does that? In my
attempts to find it, all other targets had jars, etc all over the
place.
But that's my use-case, not
Hi,
I need your help on the following query:
*Indexed data (field name is 'text'):*
**
*I'm also a cat*
*I'm pig*
*I'm a cat*
*I'm a hero*
*I'm a superman*
*I'm dog*
I want to query for *text:(i'm cat) OR text:(i'm dog) OR text:(i'm god)*
And I
That's a bit hard. I think some of this information is in the debug,
if you enable it. But that's expensive.
You don't by any chance trying to run incoming documents against a
bunch of preset queries, do you? Because if you do, Luwak might be
something to check out.
We have duplicate records in two shards and want to delete one set of duplicate
records from one shard.
curl --proxy
'http://host.abc.com:8983/solr/collection1/update?shards=localhost:8983/solr/collection1commit=true'
-H Content-Type: text/xml --data-binary
I got date fields like this.
{
date:2013-11-01T16:14:55.372Z,
latency:1
},
{
date:2013-11-01T16:14:00.372Z,
latency:6
},
{
date:013-11-01T16:15:17.496Z,
latency:3
}
I want to see the count to group by the date field(until minutes) like
that.
{
Pretty helpful, thanks Erick!
2015-01-24 9:48 GMT+08:00 Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com:
you might, but probably not enough to notice. At 50G, the tf/idf
stats will _probably_ be close enough you won't be able to tell.
That said, recently distributed tf/idf has been implemented but
I'm stumped. I've got some solrj 3.6.1 code that works fine against three of
my request handlers but not the fourth. The very odd thing is that I have no
trouble retrieving results with curl against all of the result handlers.
My solrj code sets some parameters:
ModifiableSolrParams
The recommendation these days is to NOT use the embedded server
We would love to, as it is clear that this is not the Solr-way to go. The
reason for us building upon EmbeddedSolrServer is, we have more than 150sites,
each with ist own index (core). If we'd go client server then we could no
For this I prefer TemplateTransformer to RegexTransformer - its not a
regex, just a pattern, and so should be more efficient to use
TemplateTransformer. A script will also work, of course.
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 5:54 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch arafa...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 27 January 2015 at
32 matches
Mail list logo
