Hi,
Would like to check, is there a way to query multiple collections together
in a single query and return the results in one result set?
For example, I have 2 collections and I want to search for records with the
word 'solr' in both of the collections. Is there a query to do that, or
must I
You can query multiple collections by specifying the list of collections
e.g.:
http://hostname:port
/solr/gettingstarted/select?q=testcollection=collection1,collection2,collection3
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo edwinye...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Would like to check, is
Has anyone looked at it?
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 10:18 AM, jaime spicciati jaime.spicci...@gmail.com
wrote:
We ran into this as well on 4.10.3 (not related to an upgrade). It was
identified during load testing when a small percentage of queries would
take more than 20 seconds to return. We
On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 05:48 +, Abhishek Gupta wrote:
According to this there are 137 records. Now I am faceting over these 137
records with facet.method=fc. Ideally it should just iterate over these 137
records and sub up the facets.
That is only the ideal method if you are not planning on
Thank you for the query.
Just to confirm, for the 'gettingstarted' in the query, does it matter
which collection name I put?
Regards,
Edwin
On 11 May 2015 15:51, Anshum Gupta ans...@anshumgupta.net wrote:
You can query multiple collections by specifying the list of collections
e.g.:
You are right. I get last commit time and current commit time in the
newsearcher listener, then query from last commit time to current commit time
that I can get the newest committed docs.Thanks.
Best,
WenLi
-邮件原件-
发件人: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
发送时间: 2015年5月11日
2015-05-11 4:44 GMT+01:00 Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo edwinye...@gmail.com:
I've managed to run the synonyms with 10 different synonyms file. Each of
the synonym file size is 1MB, which consist of about 1000 tokens, and each
token has about 40-50 words. These lists of files are more extreme, which I
FWIR, you just need to make sure that it's a valid collection. It doesn't
have to be one from the list of collections that you want to query, but the
collection name you use in the URL should exist.
e.g, assuming you have 2 collections foo (10 docs) and bar (5 docs):
Ok, thank you so much.
Regards,
Edwin
On 11 May 2015 16:15, Anshum Gupta ans...@anshumgupta.net wrote:
FWIR, you just need to make sure that it's a valid collection. It doesn't
have to be one from the list of collections that you want to query, but the
collection name you use in the URL
Thanks Upayavira,
I tried it by changing it to first-component in solrconfig.xml but no luck .
Am I missing something here ? Here I want to add my own qf fields with boost
in query.
--
View this message in context:
There's also Perl-backed ACK. http://beyondgrep.com/
Which does the job of searching code really well.
And I think at least once I came across something that stemmed from ACK and
claimed it was faster/better... googling... aah! The Silver Searcher it
was. :-)
http://betterthanack.com/
Thanks for the pointers. Using hl.usePhraseHighlighter=false does indeed
make it a lot faster. Obviously it's not really a solution, though,
since in 4.10 it wasn't a problem and turning it off has consequences.
I'm looking forward for the improvements in the next releases.
--Ere
8.5.2015,
On Mon, May 11, 2015, at 10:30 AM, nutchsolruser wrote:
I can not set qf in solrconfig.xml file because my qf and boost values
will
be changing frequently . I am reading those values from external source.
Can we not set qf value from searchComponent? Or is there any other way
to
do
You are adding a search component, and adding it as a
last-component, meaning, it will come after the Query component which
actually does the work.
Given the parameters you have set, you will be using the default Lucene
query parser which doesn't honour the qf parameter, so it isn't
surprising
If all you want to do is to hardwire a qf, you can do that in your
requestHandler config in solrconfig.xml.
If you want to extend how the edismax query parser works, you may well
be better off subclassing the edismax query parser, and passing in
modified request parameters, but I'd explore
Hi ,
I am trying to add my own query parameters in Solr query using solr
component . In below example I am trying to add qf parameter in the query.
Below is my prepare method of component. But Solr is not considering qf
parameter while searching It is using df parameter that I have added in
I can not set qf in solrconfig.xml file because my qf and boost values will
be changing frequently . I am reading those values from external source.
Can we not set qf value from searchComponent? Or is there any other way to
do this?
--
View this message in context:
I'm getting the following error with 4.10.4
WARN org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.SolrWriter – Error creating document :
SolrInputDocument(fields: [dcautoclasscode=310, dclang=unknown,
..., dcdocid=dd05ad427a58b49150a4ca36148187028562257a77643062382a1366250112ac])
Hi Steve,
Main advantage is that it uses binary format so XML/JSON overhead is
avoided.
You should also check out if SOLR's Data Import Handler is good fit for you.
Thanks,
Emir
--
Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management
Solr Elasticsearch Support *
Hi Everyone,
If all that I need to do is send data to Solr to add / delete a Solr
document, which tool is better for the job: SolrJ or plain old HTTP post?
In other word, what are the advantages of using SolrJ when the need is to
push data to Solr for indexing?
Thanks,
Steve
Hi Bernd,
Issue is with f_dcperson and what ends up in that field. It is
configured to be string, which means it is not tokenized so if some huge
value is in either dccreator or dccontributor it will end up as single
term. Nemes suggest that it should not contain such values, but double
check
Hi all,
Also asked this here : http://stackoverflow.com/questions/30166116
For example i have SOLR docs in which tags field is indexed :
Doc1 - tags:T1 T2
Doc2 - tags:T1 T3
Doc3 - tags:T1 T4
Doc4 - tags:T1 T2 T3
Query1 : get all docs with tags:T1 AND tags:T3 then it works and will
give Doc2
These boosting parameters will be configured outside Solr and there is
seperate module from which these values get populated , I am reading those
values from external datasource and I want to attach them to each request .
--
View this message in context:
Another advantage to SolrJ is with SolrCloud (ZK) awareness, and taking
advantage of some routing optimizations client-side so the cluster has less
hops to make.
—
Erik Hatcher, Senior Solutions Architect
http://www.lucidworks.com http://www.lucidworks.com/
On May 11, 2015, at 8:21 AM,
Hi,
Using solr 4.10.2. Looks like storeOffsetsWithPositions has no effect, i.e.
it does not store offsets in addition to positions.
If we use termVectors=true termPositions=true termOffsets=true, then
offsets and positions are available fine.
Any ideas how to make storeOffsetsWithPositions
After reading https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5472
one question still remains.
Why is it complaining about f_dcperson which is a copyField when the
origin problem field is dcdescription which definately is much larger
than 32766?
I would assume it complains about dcdescription
Hi Emir,
the dcdescription field is definately to big.
But why is it complaining about f_dcperson and not dcdescription?
Regards
Bernd
Am 11.05.2015 um 15:12 schrieb Emir Arnautovic:
Hi Bernd,
Issue is with f_dcperson and what ends up in that field. It is configured to
be string, which
Hi Bernrd,
dcdescription field is not indexed.
Thanks,
Emir
--
Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management
Solr Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
On 11.05.2015 15:22, Bernd Fehling wrote:
Hi Emir,
the dcdescription field is definately to big.
But why
Hi Shawn,
that means if I set a length limit on dcdescription or make dcdescription
multivalue
than the problem is solved because f_dcperson is already multivalue?
Regards
Bernd
Am 11.05.2015 um 15:17 schrieb Shawn Heisey:
On 5/11/2015 6:13 AM, Bernd Fehling wrote:
Caused by:
It turned out that I didn't recognized that dcdescription is not indexed,
only stored. So the next in chain ist f_dcperson where dccreator and
dcdescription is combined and indexed. And this is why the error
shows up on f_dcperson. (delay of error)
Thanks for your help, regards.
Bernd
Am
Hi Emir,
ahhh, yes you're right. I missed that. Now I understand why it is not
complaining about dcdescription and the error shows up on f_dcperson.
delay of error ;-)
Thanks
Bernd
Am 11.05.2015 um 15:25 schrieb Emir Arnautovic:
Hi Bernrd,
dcdescription field is not indexed.
Thanks,
On 5/11/2015 6:13 AM, Bernd Fehling wrote:
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Document contains at least one
immense term
in field=f_dcperson (whose UTF8 encoding is longer than the max length
32766), all of which were skipped.
Please correct the analyzer to not produce such
On 5/11/2015 7:19 AM, Bernd Fehling wrote:
After reading https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5472
one question still remains.
Why is it complaining about f_dcperson which is a copyField when the
origin problem field is dcdescription which definately is much larger
than 32766?
I
Hi Naresh,
Couldn't you could just model this as an OR query since your requirement is
at least one (but can be more than one), ie:
tags:T1 tags:T2 tags:T3
-sujit
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 4:14 AM, Naresh Yadav nyadav@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Also asked this here :
Thanks Erik and Emir.
Erik: The fact that SolrJ is aware of SolrCloud is enough to put it over
plain old HTTP post.
Emir: I looked into Solr's data import handler, unfortunately, it won't
work for my need.
To close the loop on this question, I will need to enable Jetty's SSL (the
jetty that
How about Krugle?
http://opensearch.krugle.org/
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
On May 11, 2015, at 3:18 AM, Tomasz Borek tomasz.bo...@gmail.com wrote:
There's also Perl-backed ACK. http://beyondgrep.com/
Which does the job of searching
I must be missing something obvious.I have a simple regex that removes
spacehyphenspace pattern.
The unit test below works fine, but when I plug it into schema and query,
regex does not match, since input already gets split by space (further
below). My understanding that charFilter would operate
Bumping this thread again in the group, haven't received any responses for
this.
I am kind of stuck with this problem last week, any help is highly
appreciated.
Thanks
Pradeep
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Pradeep Bhattiprolu pbhatt...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
Is there a equivalent of
unsubscribe
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
attaching them to each request, then just add qf= as a param to the URL,
easy.
On Mon, May 11, 2015, at 12:17 PM, nutchsolruser wrote:
These boosting parameters will be configured outside Solr and there is
Hi folks,
I'm playing with a custom SOLR plugin and I'm trying to retrieve the value
for a multivalued field, using the code below.
==
schema.xml:
field name=my_field_name type=string indexed=true stored=false
multiValued=true/
==
input data:
add
doc
field name=id83127/field
Need your valuable inputs...
I am indexing data from database (one table) which is in this example
format :
id name value
1 Joe 102724904
2 Joe 100996643
- id is primary/ unique key
- there can be same name but different value
- If I try name as unique key then SOLR removes duplicate and indexes
This trips up _everybody_ at one point or other. The problem is that
the input goes through the query _parsing_ prior to getting to the
field analysis, and the parser is sensitive to spaces.
Consider the input (without quotes) of my dog. That gets broken up into
default_field:my default_field:dog
I've got to ask _how_ are you intending to search this field? On the
surface, this feels like an XY problem.
It's a string type. Therefore, if this is the input:
102, 111, 114, 32, 97, 32, 114, 101, 118, 105, 101, 119, 32, 115, 101,
101, 32, 66, 114
you'll only ever get a match if you search
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 8:20 PM, Steven White swhite4...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Erik and Emir.
snip/
To close the loop on this question, I will need to enable Jetty's SSL (the
jetty that comes with Solr 5.1). If I do so, will SolrJ still work, can I
assume that SolrJ supports SSL?
Thanks Andrew, You got my problem precisely But solutions you suggested may
not work for me.
In my API i get only list of tags authorized i.e [T1, T2, T3] and based on
that only i need to construct my Solr query.
So first solution with NOT (T4 OR T5) will not work.
In real case tag ids T1, T2
Hi John,
There are a few HTTP APIs for replication, one of which can let you take a
backup of the index. Restoring can be as simple as just copying over the
index in the right location on the disk. A new restore API will be released
with the next version of Solr which will make some of these
Yes sure, thanks for your advice.
I'm still waiting for my server to come before I can scale up my system and
do the testing. Now the Solr running on my 4GB RAM system will crash if I
try to scale up my system as there's not enough memory to support it.
Regards,
Edwin
On 11 May 2015 at 19:11,
Yes sure, thanks for your advice.
I'm still waiting for my server to come before I can scale up my system and
do the testing. Now the Solr running on my 4GB RAM system will crash if I
try to scale up my system as there's not enough memory to support it.
Regards,
Edwin
On 11 May 2015 at 19:11,
Hi all,
I am trying to solve the solr multiword synonym issue at our installation, I
am currently using SOLR-4.9.x version. I used the
com.lucidworks.analysis.AutoPhrasingTokenFilterFactory from Lucidworks git
repo and used this in my schema.xml and also used their
Hi,
We have a SOLR query like this
Based on his example, it sounds like Naresh not only wants the tags field to
contain at least one of the values [T1, T2, T3] but also wants to exclude
documents that contain a tag other than T1, T2, or T3 (Doc3 should not be
retrieved).
If the set of possible values in the tags field is
A simple OR query should be fine :
tags:(T1 T2 T3)
Cheers
2015-05-11 15:39 GMT+01:00 Sujit Pal sujit@comcast.net:
Hi Naresh,
Couldn't you could just model this as an OR query since your requirement is
at least one (but can be more than one), ie:
tags:T1 tags:T2 tags:T3
-sujit
On
Hi,
Thanks for reporting, I’m working a test to reproduce.
Can you please create a Solr JIRA issue for this?:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR/
Thanks,
Steve
On May 7, 2015, at 5:40 AM, User Zolr zolr.u...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
I have come accross a problem that when
attaching them to each request, then just add qf= as a param to the URL,
easy.
On Mon, May 11, 2015, at 12:17 PM, nutchsolruser wrote:
These boosting parameters will be configured outside Solr and there is
seperate module from which these values get populated , I am reading
those
values from
54 matches
Mail list logo
