RE: Implementing AbstractFullDistribZkTestBase

Hi - no, i don't think so, it doesn't happen all the time, but too frequently. The machine running the tests has a high powered CPU, plenty of cores and RAM. Markus -Original message- > From:Mark Miller > Sent: Monday 5th October 2015 19:52 > To:

Re: How to disable the admin interface

Help please? On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Siddhartha Singh Sandhu < sandhus...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Shawn and Andrew, > > I am on page with you guys about the ssh authentication and communicating > with the API's that SOLR has to provide. I simply don't want the GUI as it > is nobody will

Re: Numeric Sorting with 0 and NULL Values

: value? I need the sort such that ascending will have the NULL values first : and descending will have the NULL values last (i.e. sortMissingFirst="false" : and sortMissingLast="false"). You can configure a default="X" attribute on your field such that X is the minimum legal value for your

Re: Implementing AbstractFullDistribZkTestBase

If it's always when using https as in your examples, perhaps it's SOLR-5776. - mark On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 10:36 AM Markus Jelsma wrote: > Hmmm, i tried that just now but i sometimes get tons of Connection reset > errors. The tests then end with "There are still

Re: How to disable the admin interface

You understand that disabling the admin API will leave you with an unmaintainable Solr installation, right? You might not even be able to diagnose the problem. wunder Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > On Oct 5, 2015, at 11:34 AM, Siddhartha

Re: How to disable the admin interface

Well, there's a difference between disabling the UI and disabling the API. The UI can be disabled (I think) by deleting the contents of server/solr-webapp/webapp (leaving behind the WEB-INF directory). But really, all that is doing is hiding a heap of code that is public already. As has been

??

http://www.slideshare.net/lucidworks/high-performance-solr-and-jvm-tuning-strategies-used-for-map-quests-search-ahead-darren-spehr See ArrayBlockingQueue. What would this help with? -- Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com cell 720-256-8076

solr-user@lucene.apache.org

What should this be set to? Do you set it with -Dsolr.jetty.https.acceptQueueSize=5000 ? -- Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com cell 720-256-8076

Re: How to disable the admin interface

Just put my solr on a private subnet. Nobody can reach it unless I will it. I am just a bit concerned whether the solr requesthandler checks against pen test logic. Thank you for the support everyone. Appreciate it. On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Upayavira wrote: > Well,

Pressed optimize and now SOLR is not indexing while optimize is going on

Hi, I pressed the optimize switch. Wasn't the best decision I made today. The aftermath of it was that when I tried to index more documents the curl just waited and waited. I pinged my SOLR and all is well. I am able to access the admin console also. I can query the SOLR machine too. But, I

Delete term vectors from existing index

I'm looking for a way to delete term vectors from existing index, schema is changed to 'termVectors="false" ' and optimization was performed after that, but index size remains the same (I'm totally sure, that optimization was successful). I've also tried to add some new documents to existing index

Re: Keyword match distance rule issue

Hello, Could you please try same search query on your machine to check if it matches? Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Keyword-match-distance-rule-issue-tp4231624p4232713.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Highlight with NGram and German S Sharp "ß"

Dear Solr Users, I am facing a problem with highligting on ngram fields. Highlighting is working well, except for words with german character "ß". Eg : with q=rosen& "highlighting": { "gcl3r:12723710:6643": { "textng": [ "Rosensteinpark (Métro), Stuttgart

Implementing AbstractFullDistribZkTestBase

Hello, I have several implementations of AbstractFullDistribZkTestBase of Solr 5.3.0. Sometimes a test fails with either "There are still nodes recoverying - waited for 30 seconds" or "IOException occured when talking to server at: https://127.0.0.1:44474/collection1;, so usually at least one

Re: Solr Log Analysis

Best tool for this job really depends on your needs, but one option: I have a dev tool for Solr log analysis: https://github.com/markrmiller/SolrLogReader If you use the -o option, it will spill out just the queries to a file with qtimes. - Mark On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 8:16 PM Tarala, Magesh

Re: Pressed optimize and now SOLR is not indexing while optimize is going on

I restarted my SOLR and it is now not reloading the configuration. Is my solr index corrupted? Sid. On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: > You should be able to insert while optimizing. Do be aware that > optimize will probably require that your disk

Re: Pressed optimize and now SOLR is not indexing while optimize is going on

Thank you Eric. I think your explanation was the reason. Following up on that: Would having an SSD make considerable difference in speed? On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Siddhartha Singh Sandhu < sandhus...@gmail.com> wrote: > Scrap the last one. It just took 10 mins to load. I panicked too

Re: Pressed optimize and now SOLR is not indexing while optimize is going on

You should be able to insert while optimizing. Do be aware that optimize will probably require that your disk have free _at least_ as much space as the index takes up. It may just be that the disk is so busy with the optimize (it's mostly just writing from one file to another) that it's appearing

Re: Pressed optimize and now SOLR is not indexing while optimize is going on

Scrap the last one. It just took 10 mins to load. I panicked too quick. On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Siddhartha Singh Sandhu < sandhus...@gmail.com> wrote: > I restarted my SOLR and it is now not reloading the configuration. > Is my solr index corrupted? > > Sid. > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at

Re: Drill down facet for multi valued groups of fields

Hi Alessandro, thanks for the reply! I wasn’t aware of nested documents, as you say, it seems precisely what I need .. in fact it looks like I plagiarised that article while writing my description hehe. Upgrading from 4.10 is a bit of work but, might just be worth it. Many Thanks! Douglas

Re: Pressed optimize and now SOLR is not indexing while optimize is going on

bq: Would having an SSD make considerable difference in speed Almost certainly. Optimize is rarely necessary, especially if you're indexing relatively constantly so just avoiding that might do the trick ;). But reloading shouldn't be taking 10 minutes. Before 5.2, if you had suggesters

Re: Implementing AbstractFullDistribZkTestBase

Not sure what that means :) SOLR-5776 would not happen all the time, but too frequently. It also wouldn't matter the power of CPU, cores or RAM :) Do you see fails without https is what you want to check. - mark On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 2:16 PM Markus Jelsma wrote:

Re: Recovery Thread Blocked

I'd make two guess: Looks like you are using Jrocket? I don't think that is common or well tested at this point. There are a billion or so bug fixes from 4.6.1 to 5.3.2. Given the pace of SolrCloud, you are dealing with something fairly ancient and so it will be harder to find help with older

Re: How to disable the admin interface

On 10/4/2015 3:07 PM, Siddhartha Singh Sandhu wrote: > I am on page with you guys about the ssh authentication and communicating > with the API's that SOLR has to provide. I simply don't want the GUI as it > is nobody will be able to access it once I set the policy on my server > except for

FieldCache?

So the FieldCache was removed from Solr 5. What is the implication of this? Should we move all facets to DocValues when we have high cardinality (lots of values) ? Are we adding it back? Other ideas to improve performance? >From Mike M: FieldCache is gone (moved to a dedicated

Re: Drill down facet for multi valued groups of fields

Hi Douglas ! Your use case is a really good fit for Nested Objects in Solr[1] After you model your problem in nested objects, you should play a little bit with faceting at different levels ( parent/children). A pivot faceting can be good in some scenario, probably not in yours. I would probably

Re: Delete term vectors from existing index

What make believe you there is a good way to remove the term vectors without re-indexing ? It does make sense that the simple optimise did not the job. It is what I would expect. I agree with you that term vectors are a separated data structure in the index, but I doubt there is a way to

Please add me to ContributorsGroup of the Solr Wiki

Hello, Could you please add me to the ContributorsGroup of the Solr Wiki? I have made Serbian analyzer for Solr [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6053] and would now like to write about some Serbian search considerations. My wiki username is NikolaSmolenski. -- Nikola Smolenski

Best Indexing Approaches - To max the throughput

I was doing some studies and analysis, just wondering in your opinion which one is the best approach to use to index in Solr to reach the best throughput possible. I know that a lot of factor are affecting Indexing time, so let's only focus in the feeding approach. Let's isolate different

Re: Keyword match distance rule issue

Hi Anil, what does make you feel that bridgewater~2 is not matching bridwater ? Are you sure bridwater is in your index ? Are you sure is in the field where you are looking for bridgewater ? I would verify that, because it does n to make sense as they both have the same distance to bridwater. Are

Re: Reverse query?

Hi Remi, Your use-case is more-or-less exactly what I wrote luwak for: https://github.com/flaxsearch/luwak. You register your queries with a Monitor object, and then match documents against them. The monitor analyzes the documents that are passed in and tries to filter out queries that it

Re: Best Indexing Approaches - To max the throughput

SolrJ tends to be faster for several reasons, not the least of which is that it sends packets to Solr in a more efficient binary format. Batching is critical. I did some rough tests using SolrJ and sending docs one at a time gave a throughput of < 400 docs/second. Sending 10 gave 2,300 or so.

Re: Join with faceting and filtering

Hello Troy, What a challenge!! On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Troy Edwards wrote: > > 2) It appears that I cannot have fromIndex=Contracts because it is very > large and has to be sharded. Per my understanding SolrCloud join does not > support multiple shards > ..

RE: Implementing AbstractFullDistribZkTestBase

Hmmm, i tried that just now but i sometimes get tons of Connection reset errors. The tests then end with "There are still nodes recoverying - waited for 30 seconds". [RecoveryThread-collection1] ERROR org.apache.solr.cloud.RecoveryStrategy - Error while trying to

Re: Please add me to ContributorsGroup of the Solr Wiki

Done, thanks! On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 3:24 AM, Nikola Smolenski wrote: > Hello, > > Could you please add me to the ContributorsGroup of the Solr Wiki? I have > made Serbian analyzer for Solr [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6053] and would now like to > write

Re: Implementing AbstractFullDistribZkTestBase

Right, I'm assuming you're creating a cluster somewhere. Try calling (from memory) waitForRecoveriesToFinish in AbstractDistribZkTestBase after creating the collection to insure that the nodes are up and running before you index to them. Shot in the dark Erick On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 1:36 AM,

Re: Reverse query?

Hi Remi, I'm not sure what you mean by filtering on the fly? With the percolator, if you're going to do filtering at match time, you still need to have added the terms to filter on when you add the query. And you can actually do the same sort of thing in luwak, using a

Re: Reverse query?

Hi Alan, I became aware of Luwak a few months ago and I'm planning on using it in the future. The only reason I couldn’t use it for my specific scenario was the fact that I needed the possibility to filter on the fly and not necessarily include filtering while building the query index. Apparently

Re: Recovery Thread Blocked

Any takers on this? Any kinda clue would help. Thanks. On 10/4/15 10:14 AM, Rallavagu wrote: As there were no responses so far, I assume that this is not a very common issue that folks come across. So, I went into source (4.6.1) to see if I can figure out what could be the cause. The thread

Re: Best Indexing Approaches - To max the throughput

Thanks Erick, you confirmed my impressions! Thank you very much for the insights, an other opinion is welcome :) Cheers 2015-10-05 14:55 GMT+01:00 Erick Erickson : > SolrJ tends to be faster for several reasons, not the least of which > is that it sends packets to Solr