Forking Solr

Hi guys, I'd like to get your tips on how to run a Solr fork at my company. I know Yonik has a "heliosearch" fork, and I'm sure many others have a fork. There have been times where I want to add features to an existing core plugin, and subclassing isn't possible so I end up copying the source

Re: NullPointerException

Yes, I'm aware that building an index is expensive and I will remove "buildOnStartup" once I have it working. The field I added was an attempt to get it working... I have attached my latest version of solrconfig.xml and schema.xml (both are in the same attachment), except that I have removed

Re: File-based Spelling

On 10/13/2015 9:30 AM, Dyer, James wrote: Mark, The older spellcheck implementations create an n-gram sidecar index, which is why you're seeing your name split into 2-grams like this. See the IR Book by Manning et al, section 3.3.4 for more information. Based on the results you're getting,

Re: Forking Solr

Ryan, >From a "solr-user" perspective :) I would advise against forking Solr. Some of our consulting business is "people who forked Solr, need to upgrade, and now have gotten themselves into hot water." I would try, in the following order 1. Creating a plugin (sounds like you can't do this) 2.

Re: Forking Solr

Thanks for the feedback, forking lucene/solr is my last resort indeed. 1) It's not about creating fresh new plugins. It's about modifying existing ones or core solr code. 2) I want to submit the patch to modify core solr or lucene code, but I also want to run it in prod before its accepted and

Re: Forking Solr

I suspect these questions should go the Lucene Dev list instead. This one is more for those who build on top of standard Solr. Regards, Alex. Solr Analyzers, Tokenizers, Filters, URPs and even a newsletter: http://www.solr-start.com/ On 16 October 2015 at 12:07, Ryan Josal

Child document and parent document with same key

I am looking at using child documents and noticed that if I specify a child and parent with the same key solr indexes this fine and I can retrieve both documents separately. Is this expected to work? -Jamie

Efficiency of integer storage/use

Hi, I have a data model where I would store and index a lot of integer values with a very restricted range (e.g. 0-255), so theoretically the 32 bits of Solr's integer fields are complete overkill. I want to be able to to things like vector distance calculations on those fields. Should I worry

Re: simple test on solr 5.2.1 wrong leader elected on startup

On 15 October 2015 at 23:54, Matteo Grolla wrote: > Don't think so, > the default behaviour at 4), to my knowledge,is to wait 3 minutes > (leaderVoteWait) for all replicas to come up to avoid electing a leader > with stale data. So the observed behaviour is unexpected

Re: Filtering on a Field with Suggestion

Thanks for pointing out as I am using Solr cloud 5.3. However, it looks like they are talking about boolean operation in context field and not the support of context field itself. Are you sure that context filtering is not supported with any lookup prior to 5.4? On Oct 16, 2015 12:47 PM,

Re: Efficiency of integer storage/use

Hi Robert, current Solr compression will work really well , both for Stored and DocValues contents. Related the index term dictionaries, I ask for some help to other experts as I never checked how the actual compression works in there, but I assume it is quite efficient. Usually the field type

Re: Filtering on a Field with Suggestion

This will sound silly, but which version of Solr are you using ? According to : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7888 This new cool feature will be included in solr 5.4 . Cheers On 15 October 2015 at 22:53, Salman Ansari wrote: > Hi guys, > > I am working

Re: Filtering on a Field with Suggestion

Yes, as Jan confirmed, I am sure it was not there in 5.3 :) Cheers On 16 October 2015 at 12:10, Jan Høydahl wrote: > Yesm > > Context filtering is a new feature in yet-to-be-released Solr5.4. > So you have to build branch_5x from source yourself to try it out. > > -- >

Re: Filtering on a Field with Suggestion

Yesm Context filtering is a new feature in yet-to-be-released Solr5.4. So you have to build branch_5x from source yourself to try it out. -- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > 16. okt. 2015 kl. 12.35 skrev Salman Ansari : > >

Re: Nested entities not imported / do not show up in search?

Hi Matthias, you should use . in your expressions. So for example, here WHERE fb.EBI_NR='${firma.firma_ebi_nr}' should be WHERE fb.EBI_NR='${firma.EBI_NR}' Best, Andrea 2015-10-16 13:40 GMT+02:00 Matthias Fischer : > Hello everybody, > > I am trying to

Re: Recursively scan documents for indexing in a folder in SolrJ

SolrJ does not have any file crawler built in. But you are free to steal code from SimplePostTool.java related to directory traversal, and then index each document found using SolrJ. Note that SimplePostTool.java tries to be smart with what endpoint to post files to, xml, csv and json content

Nested entities not imported / do not show up in search?

Hello everybody, I am trying to import from an Oracle DB 11g2 via DIH using SOLR 5.3.1. In my relational DB there are company addresses (table tb_firmen_adressen) and branches (table tb_branchen). They have an n:m relationship using the join table tb_firmen_branchen. Now I would like to find

RE: Recursively scan documents for indexing in a folder in SolrJ

Also, check this link for SolrJ example code (including the recursion): https://lucidworks.com/blog/2012/02/14/indexing-with-solrj/ Geraint Geraint Duck Data Scientist Toxicology and Health Sciences Syngenta UK Email: geraint.d...@syngenta.com -Original Message- From: Jan Høydahl

Re: Highlight with NGram and German S Sharp "ß"

Thanks for your reply Scott. I tried bs.language=de=de Unfortunately the problem still occurs. I have just discovered that the problem does not only affect "ß" but also "æ" (which is mapped to "ae" at query and index time) q=hae --> hæna So it seems to me that the problem is related to

AW: Nested entities not imported / do not show up in search?

Thank you, Andrea, for answering so quickly. However I got further errors. I also had to change "firma_ebi_nr" to "id". But it still does not work properly. It seems that an id is auto generated for the company documents but not for the nested ones (the business branches). Any ideas how to

Re: Nested entities not imported / do not show up in search?

Hi Matthias, I guess the company.id field is not unique so you need a "compound" uniqueKey on Solr, which is not strctly possible. As consequence of that (company) UUID is probably created before the index phase by an UpdateRequestProcessor [1] so you should check your solrconfig.xml and, if I'm

Sold Geospatial Visualisation

Hi, I am aware of Solr’s geospatial capabilities. However, wondering what is the best way to visualise Solr geospatial data. Is there any native support in Solritas or is there any other mechanism that suits thes requirement best? For example, if my problem is to find the best possible route

Re: Efficiency of integer storage/use

Under the covers, Lucene stores ints in a packed format, so I'd just count on that for a first pass. What is "a lot of integer values"? Hundreds of millions? Billions? Trillions? Unless you give us some indication of scale, it's hard to say anything helpful. But unless you have some evidence

Re: Help me read Thread

One more observation made is that tomcat's acceptor thread for http disappears (http-bio-8080-acceptor thread) and due to this no incoming connections could be opened on http. During this time ZK potentially thinks node is up and shows green from leader. On 10/13/15 9:17 AM, Erick Erickson

Re: Recursively scan documents for indexing in a folder in SolrJ

Thanks for your advice. I also found this method which so far has been able to traverse all the documents in the folder and index them in Solr. public static void showFiles(File[] files) { for (File file : files) { if (file.isDirectory()) { System.out.println("Directory: "

Re: Forking Solr

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015, at 04:00 PM, Ryan Josal wrote: > Thanks for the feedback, forking lucene/solr is my last resort indeed. > > 1) It's not about creating fresh new plugins. It's about modifying > existing ones or core solr code. > 2) I want to submit the patch to modify core solr or lucene