Re: Lucene Revolution ?

I couldn't also make it. Would love to hear more who make it. Thanks, Susheel On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Jack Krupansky wrote: > Sorry I missed out this year. I thought it was next month and hadn't seen > any reminders. Just last Tuesday I finally got around

Problem with indexing chinese characters when using SolrJ

Hi, I'm using the URLEncoder withg "UTF-8" encoding in SolrJ (code is written in Eclipse) to index the file name to Solr. The code looks like this. req.setParam("literal.title", URLEncoder.encode(filename, "UTF-8")); However, what is index in Solr is a string of code like this "%E7%AB%8B%E9".

solr more like this sort / reranking

hi all. i am new in solr.i use more like this (query handler) for get docs that are similar to specefic doc that i mentioned. and my issue is when i get some docs , i wanna to changed sort of that, for example imagine that docs have one field as like_count, i wanna to get more related docs to doc

Re: Lucene Revolution ?

Here's a bit from my colleague Eric Pugh summarizing Grants keynote. Admittedly he's also focussing a lot on our firms relevance capabilities/products (the keynote was on relevance) so extensive shameless plug warning included with this link :)

Re: PayloadTermQuery deprecated

Here is my first stab at it. Thoughts? Question: new PayloadTermQuery(new Term(nv[0].substring(1), nv[1]), new AveragePayloadFunction(), false) How do I handle the "false" ? It means boolean includeSpanScore @Override public Query parse() throws SyntaxError { if (qstr == null ||

Re: Lucene Revolution ?

Summary of new things in 5.x or 6.x that is catching fire? Ideas? Thoughts on the Facet caching flame war? On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Susheel Kumar wrote: > I couldn't also make it. Would love to hear more who make it. > > Thanks, > Susheel > > On Sun, Oct 18,

PayloadTermQuery deprecated

Wondering how to change my payload based on example: https://lucidworks.com/blog/2014/06/13/end-to-end-payload-example-in-solr/ PayloadTermQuery and BooleanQuery are deprecated in 5.3.x @Override public Query parse() throws SyntaxError { if (qstr == null || qstr.length() == 0) return null;

Re: Lucene Revolution ?

Lucene/Solr Revolution just keeps getting better every year, and this year was clearly the best year yet! I saw two major themes that I'd say about about 2/3 of the talk were focused on: 1) Search Relevancy 2) Analytics I'd definitely say that that there's a greatly emerging landscape of

SOLR-7191 SolrCloud 5 with thousands of collections

Hi All, I've had a first look at porting the patch I did for SOLR-7191 (SolrCloud with thousands of collections) in Solr 4.10 to the Solr trunk (1708905). Now I created 6,000 collections (3 nodes; 2 x replicas) and re-started the 3 nodes. What I noticed is that the cloud is starting but slowly.

Re: Efficiency of integer storage/use

Robert, >From what I know as inverted index as docvalues compress content much, even stored fields compressed too. So, I think you have much chance to experiment successfully. You might need tweak schema disabling storing unnecessary info in the index. On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 1:15 AM, Robert

Re: Lucene Revolution ?

The Revolution was not televised (though heavily tweeted, and videos of sessions to follow eventually). A great time was had by all. Much learning! Much collaboration. Awesome event if I may say so myself. I'm proud to be a part of the organization that put on the best conference I've been

Re: Lucene Revolution ?

It went very well. Lots of interesting talks. I believe you (Mr. Bell) were even mentioned by Ted Sullivan for voting for his Jira proposal on the AutophrasingFilter. The talk was extremely interesting and I intend to follow up on it. :-) The slides are starting to come up already. Mine are at:

Re: Efficiency of integer storage/use

On the surface this seems like something of a distraction. 10M docs x 100 values/docs = 1B integers. Assuming all need to be held in memory at once. My straw-man proposal: it would be much cheaper to just provision each JVM with an additional couple of gig memory and forget about it. Feel free to

Re: Efficiency of integer storage/use

I'd still like to see a very clear statement of how data is stored in Lucene. For example, is there any increase in index size if you placed your 32-bit integers in a long field? Could somebody make a clear statement about what the index packing/compression would actually do - not the actual

Re: Lucene Revolution ?

Sorry I missed out this year. I thought it was next month and hadn't seen any reminders. Just last Tuesday I finally got around to googling the conference and was shocked to read that it was the next day. Oh well. Personally I'm less interested in the formal sessions than the informal networking.

Add replication to http://localhost:8983/solr/#/~cores/extinfo

It would be very useful to add a button to replicate (like we have optimize) on http://localhost:8983/solr/#/~cores/extinfo Also a link to the core would be great too -- Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com cell 720-256-8076