Re: Integrating Stanford NLP or any other NLP for Natural Language Query

Hi Puneet, I only use Watson's text to speech as user interface, because a lot of people think NLP is the same as voice recognition. If you don't need voice recognition you could remove Watson from it. Stanford has better dependency parsing and can be used offline. However it seems you are using

Re: Integrating Stanford NLP or any other NLP for Natural Language Query

Hi Yangrui, I have been looking at your code for squery. Unfortunately, I am not very conversant with SolrJ. I seem to be missing how and what data is added to the Solr index. Also, I see some references to IBM Watson in your code. Are you using IBM Watson? If yes, then why use the Stanford NLP

Re: sorlcloud connection issue

Dear Mr. Heisey! Thanks for your reply very much! as you said, I think this will be key to the issue, and I will config "maxThreads" next week. hope it will work. Thanks again! 2016-07-07 22:24 GMT+08:00 Shawn Heisey : > On 7/6/2016 5:26 AM, Kent Mu wrote: > > Hi friends!

Re: sorlcloud connection issue

Dear Mr. Mangar! Thanks for your reply. we have 3 cores with 5 shards, and each shard with one leader and one replication. now the data account goes to be 100 million, and it is still growing up.I see no connection timeout. actually we have schedule job to commit the data every 2 hours. so the

Re: Integrating Stanford NLP or any other NLP for Natural Language Query

Hi Alessandro I am looking at being able to answer questions like "Can a non-compete clause in an employment agreement be enforced after the expiry of the agreement?" We are doing some testing with IBM Watson and with a sample test data, we are able to get relevant replies to the above question.

Re: Integrating Stanford NLP or any other NLP for Natural Language Query

Hi Alessandro I am looking at being able to answer questions like "Can a non-compete clause in an employment agreement be enforced after the expiry of the agreement?" On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 4:34 AM, Alessandro Benedetti wrote: > Hi Puneet, > your requirement : > "I would