Lucas,
What is in the log before that stackdump?
The stackdump seems to indicate that Solr is trying to run with a
managed schema. Looking at the cwiki, "When a ||is not
explicitly declared in a |solrconfig.xml|file, Solr implicitly uses
a|ManagedIndexSchemaFactory|, which is by default|"muta
This is understood.
My question is: I have a keep words filter on field2. field2 is used for
clustering.
Will the cluster algorithm use „some data“ or the result of the application of
the keep words filter applied to „some data“.
Cheers,
Thomas
> Am 26.07.2017 um 01:36 schrieb Erick Erickson
copyFields are completely independent. The _raw_ data is passed to both. IOW,
sending
some data
is equivalent to this with no copyfield
some data
some data
Best,
Erick
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Thomas Krebs wrote:
> I have defined a copied field on which I would like to use clustering
Hey guys.
Trying to make solr work here, but I'm getting this error from this command:
$ ./solr create -c products -d /Users/lucaswxp/reduza-solr/products/conf/
Error CREATEing SolrCore 'products': Unable to create core [products]
Caused by: null
I'm posting my solrconf.xml, schema.xml and data
I agree, although we do have a NewRatio of two instead of three. One of our
clusters takes between 600 to 800 queries per second per replica. Lowering it
but just one got us much more performance. A note, the only cache is
FilterCache and it has just a few dozen entries.
-Original message-
Hello,
I'm using pivot faceting and in the response the pivot name has a comma. I'm
deserializing this json response to an object in .net and I am having
trouble with the comma. I'm wondering if there is a way to remove the comma
from the response? I basically have a category/subcategory hierarchy
Thanks a lot for the responses, after the optimize is complete and i have
some time to experiment ill throw some of these settings in place,
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Walter Underwood
wrote:
> I’ve never been fond of elaborate GC settings. I prefer to set a few
> things then let it run. I
I’ve never been fond of elaborate GC settings. I prefer to set a few things
then let it run. I know someone who’s worked on garbage collectors for thirty
years. I don’t second guess him.
From watching GC performance under a load benchmark (CMS/ParNew) with Solr 4.x,
I increased the new space.
Upgrade to 6.x and get, in general, decent JVM settings. And decrease your
heap, having it so extremely large is detrimental at best.
Our shards can be 25 GB in size, but we run fine (apart from other problems
recently discovered) with a 900 MB heap, so you probably have a lot of room to
spare.
it turned out that i think it was a large GC operation, as it has since
resumed optimizing. current java options are as follows for the indexing
server (they are different for the search servers) if you have any
suggestions as to changes I am more than happy to hear them, honestly they
have just b
Are you sure you need a 100GB heap? The stall could be a major GC.
We run with an 8GB heap. We also run with Xmx equal to Xms, growing memory to
the max was really time-consuming after startup.
What version of Java? What GC options?
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.
I am trying to optimize a rather large index (417gb) because its sitting at
28% deletions. However when optimizing, it stops at exactly 492.24 GB
every time. When I restart solr it will fall back down to 417 gb, and
again, if i send an optimize command, the exact same 492.24 GB and it stops
optim
I have defined a copied field on which I would like to use clustering. I
understood that the destination field will store the full content despite the
filter chain I defined.
Now, I have a keep word filter defined on the copied field.
If I run clustering on the copied field will it use the resu
Hello,
We are using highlighting and are looking for the exact phrase "HIV
Prevention" but are receiving back highlighted snippets like the
following where non-phrase matching portions are being highlighted, is
there a setting to highlight the entire phrase instead of any partial
token match
Zheng,
You may want to check https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7452. I
don't know whether they are absolutely related but I am sure I have seen
complaints and enquiries regarding not precise statistics with JSON Facets.
Amrit Sarkar
Search Engineer
Lucidworks, Inc.
415-589-9269
www.lucid
Ronald:
Actually, people generally don't search on master ;). The idea is that
master is configured for heavy indexing and then people search on the
slaves which are configured for heavy query loads (e.g. memory,
autowarming, whatever may be different). Which is it's own problem
since the time the
Not that i am aware of to sort by numBuckets but how much difference it
make if you sort by count. For e.g. below result is sorted by inner count
and numBuckets in this example has same order.
curl http://localhost:8983/solr/techproducts/query -d 'q=*:*&rows=0&
json.facet={
Slight typo:
formerly called “composite ID routing”
should read
formerly called “implicit routing”
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Walter Underwood wrote:
> Solr is not Oracle. Designs that might be great for Oracle can be terrible
> for Solr.
>
> Solr really does not do this automatically, so
Solr is not Oracle. Designs that might be great for Oracle can be terrible for
Solr.
Solr really does not do this automatically, so you won’t find that. If your job
is to find that feature, you will fail. If your job is “find or write the
feature”, you will be writing it.
As I said before, you
Bingo! Right on both counts! opensearcher was false. When I changed it to
true, then I could see that master(searching) and master(replicable) both
changed. And autocommit.maxtime is causing a commit on the master.
Who uses master(replicable)? It seems for my simple master/slave configurati
Je, I also think that!.
We have some serious gaps on what you explain to me.
First, you point me that there's no real need to use ShingleFilter, I tried
with all Tokenizer and the result is the same, the species are not caught.
On the simplest scenario I've got this:
PUT YOUR FAVORI
Another sanity check. With deletion, only option would be to reindex those
documents. Could someone please let me know if I am missing anything or if I
am on track here. Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Lucene-index-corruption-and-recovery-tp4347439p43
When scores are identical, the tie is broken by the _internal_ Lucene doc ID.
For the same doc on two different replicas of the same shard, the internal
ID is not only different, but two docs may be ordered (by internal doc ID) one
way on replica1 and reversed on replica2.
To guarantee identical o
Hi,
According to http://yonik.com/solr-facet-functions/, we can sort on "any
facet function that appears in each bucket":
$ curl http://localhost:8983/solr/query -d 'q=*:*&
json.facet={
categories:{
type : terms,
field : cat,
sort : "x desc", // can also use sort:{x:desc}
Hey,
I know this is not quite the right place to ask for my nutch question.
But, did one of you guy manage to use MS-SQL as GoraBackend for Nutch 2.3?
As our the Website we are about to crawl, is not that big I would love to use
MS-SQL. So far I haven't worked with hadoop, and in our company we
Am 25.07.2017 um 15:09 schrieb Mikhail Khludnev:
> Since all scores are equal it just can not break this tie. Add id as a sort
> clause to make results deterministic.
What about setting statsCache to ExactSharedStatsCache?
But there is all the same score 1.0, so maybe not a solution?
Bernd
>
>
Since all scores are equal it just can not break this tie. Add id as a sort
clause to make results deterministic.
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Bernd Fehling <
bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:
> Any wildcard query will do it, e.g. .../select?q=ant*&wt=json&...
>
> A couple of "shift + re
i thought you said different results i.e. different count.
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Bernd Fehling <
bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:
> Any wildcard query will do it, e.g. .../select?q=ant*&wt=json&...
>
> A couple of "shift + reload" (to bypass cache) in the browser and you
> will s
This is the way which I put my JSON facet.
totalAmount:"sum(sum(amount1_d,amount2_d))"
amount1_d: 69446961.2
amount2_d: 0
Result I get: 69446959.27
Regards,
Edwin
On 25 July 2017 at 20:44, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to do a sum of two double fields in JSON Facet. One o
Hi,
I'm trying to do a sum of two double fields in JSON Facet. One of the field
has a value of 69446961.2, while the other is 0. However, when I get the
result, I'm getting a value of 69446959.27. This is 1.93 lesser than the
original value.
What could be the reason?
I'm using Solr 6.5.1.
Regar
Any wildcard query will do it, e.g. .../select?q=ant*&wt=json&...
A couple of "shift + reload" (to bypass cache) in the browser and you
will see that the order of the result changes sometimes.
Definately no updates/ingestion because it's currently a
SolrCloud test system with only 12 mio. docs.
What is the query you are executing if you can share. Due you think
difference could be due to updates/ingestion happening same time?
Thanks,
Susheel
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 7:47 AM, Bernd Fehling <
bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:
> With SolrCloud 6.4.2 (5 shards on 5 server) and a wildca
With SolrCloud 6.4.2 (5 shards on 5 server) and a wildcard query
I get different results between the same query.
I assume this is alltogether due to the distributed search and
the response time of each server and the constant score of 1.0 ???
Is there any config where I can set the shard order (s
Hi Team,
I am budding data scientist, I am trying to implement NER in solr, using UIMA,
came across a project on the same by Tommaso,
I am using solr 3.4, not able to achieve any NER but I am getting score for the
query. The analysis page is also not loading, throwing a jsp not laod error.
Pleas
Hi guys,
Thank you very much for the help. I think I see what is going on. yes it is
related to the Shingle filter added to the analyzer. It shouldn't be there
if a FreeTextLookup factory is used in the suggester, because it creates
conflict. The StandardTokenizer removes punctuation, including sp
I think this bit is the problem :
"I am using a Shingle filter right after the StandardTokenizer, not sure if
that has anything to do with it. "
When using the FreeTextLookup approach, you don't need to use shingles in
your analyser, shingles are added by the suggester itself.
As Erick mentioned
36 matches
Mail list logo
