On 12/8/2017 1:03 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
Second, grouping works fine in distributed mode with a couple of
restrictions, see the reference guide. Collapse/Expand (an alternative
to standard grouping) requires that all the members of a group be on
the same shard.
In 5.x, distributed grouping
Hi Diego,
Thank you, I will look into this and see how I could patch this.
Thank you for your quick response,
Roopa
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Diego Ceccarelli wrote:
> Hi Roopa,
>
> LTR is implemented using RankQuery, and at the moment grouping doens't
>
: We're started to migrate our integration-framework to move over to
: JavaEE JSON-B as default json-serialization /deserialization framework
: and now the highlighning component is giving us some troubles. Here's a
: constructed example of the JSON response from Solr.
Wait .. what? that
Hi Roopa,
LTR is implemented using RankQuery, and at the moment grouping doens't
support RankQuery.
I opened a jira item time ago
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8776) and I would be happy
to receive feedback on that. You can find the code here
Rick ,
Thanks for your reply. I do not see any errors or exceptions in the solr
logs. I have read that the my schema in nutch needs to match the schema in
solr. When I change the schema in in the config directory and restart solr my
changes are lost. Leaving the schema alone is the only
Hi,
I am using grouping and LTR together and the results are not getting
re-rank as it does without grouping.
I am passing parameter.
Does LTR work with grouping on?
Solr version 6.5
Thank you,
Roopa
Ara
Softcommit might be the default in Solrconfig.xml, and if not then you should
probably make it so. Then you need to have a look in solr.log if things are not
working as you expect.
Cheers -- Rick
On December 8, 2017 3:23:35 PM EST, "Mukhopadhyay, Aratrika"
Join us at Haystack, April 10 & 11 where we discuss advanced technical
topics on search relevance and cognitive search! We'll discuss topics on
applied relevance engineering with fellow practitioners, in Solr,
Elasticsearch, Vespa, and adjacent technologies
Topics include:
- Learning to Rank
-
Erick,
Do I need to set the softCommit = true and prepareCommit to true in my
solrconfig ? I am still at a loss as to what is happening. Thanks again for
your help.
Aratrika
From: Mukhopadhyay, Aratrika
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2017 11:34 AM
To: solr-user
bq: Will TLOG replicas use less network bandwidth?
No, probably more bandwidth. TLOG replicas work like this:
1> the raw docs are forwarded
2> the old-style master/slave replication is used
So what you do save is CPU processing on the TLOG replica in exchange
for increased bandwidth.
Since the
Grouping does _not_ require docValues, it's just that the with
docValues=false, uninverted structure is built on the heap at run
time. When docValues=true, the uninverted structure is written to disk
at index time and MMapped into the OS's memory space rather than the
Java heap.
Second, grouping
Anyone have any thoughts on this? Will TLOG replicas use less network
bandwidth?
-Joe
On 12/4/2017 12:54 PM, Joe Obernberger wrote:
Hi All - this same problem happened again, and I think I partially
understand what is going on. The part I don't know is what caused any
of the replicas to
Thanks Rick,
While long term storage of the documents in HDFS is not necessary you do
raise that easy access to these documents durning the development phase
will be useful.
Cassandra,
spark-solr I am under the impression that I must be running SolrCloud. At
this time I need some of the
Ah, thank you Erick & Shawn. That makes perfect sense. And yes when this goes
to prod it will be distributed. Good point about docValues and needing a single
shard, thanks!
I’m new to result grouping, so I’m still prototyping that it will work for what
I need.
On 12/8/17, 12:00 PM, "Erick
Matthew,
The hadoop-solr project you mention would give you the ability to index
files in HDFS. It's a Job Jar, so you submit it to Hadoop with the params
you need and it processes the files and sends them to Solr. It might not be
the fastest thing in the world since it uses MapReduce but we (I
I think you're getting confused by seeing the _stored_ data rather
than the indexed data. When you return fields in documents, you get
the stored data which is a verbatim copy of the input, no analysis
done at all. To see what's in the index (and thus what would be
grouped on) look at:
On 12/8/2017 9:56 AM, Bradley Belyeu wrote:
> I’m wanting to do a result grouping by the first three characters, period, &
> digit(s). For example, docs with the unique keys JHN.3.16 & JHN.3.17 I would
> want grouped together.
> So my thought was to define another field and then copy the USFM
Thanks Erick.
Im using ManifoldCF to connect to Fileshare and index the content to Solr.
So I was thinking to customize Solr's updateProcessor. However, It looks
like Manifold CF need to have Tika extracting before indexing to Solr.
am not sure what should be our approach.
-Sreenivas
On 8
I’m struggling a bit getting a copy field & regex tokenizer to work like I
think it should…
I have an open source project I’m just starting out with here:
https://github.com/youversion/solrcloud
I have a uniqueKey field USFM defined as:
And a USFM will always be in the pattern of 3 characters
Hello Erick ,
This is what I see in the logs :
[cid:image001.png@01D37018.62D3CC90]
I am sorry it sbeen a while since I worked with solr. I did not do anything to
specifically commit the changes to the core. Thanks for your prompt attention
to this matter.
Aratrika
I wouldn't extend the extracting request handler at all, just run the
custom code independently of Solr. This is generally recommended
anyway, here's a way to get started:
https://lucidworks.com/2012/02/14/indexing-with-solrj/
The database bits are just there because I wanted to talk about both
1> do you see update messages in the Solr logs?
2> did you issue a commit?
Best,
Erick
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 7:27 AM, Mukhopadhyay, Aratrika <
aratrika.mukhopadh...@mail.house.gov> wrote:
> Good Morning,
>
>I am running nutch 2.3 , hbase 0.98 and I am integrating nutch
> with solr
Good Morning,
I am running nutch 2.3 , hbase 0.98 and I am integrating nutch with
solr 6.4. I have a successful crawl in nutch and when I see that it is indexing
the content into solr. However I cannot query and get any results. Its as if
Nutch isn't writing anything to solr at all.
On 12/8/2017 4:07 AM, sarat chandra wrote:
> Currently we have a request handler contains appends option like below
>
>
> inStock:true
>
> Now i want to append this filter to query on conditional based.
> If my request query contains a flag or if the flag is true, i need to
> append the above
HI
Currently we have a request handler contains appends option like below
inStock:true
Now i want to append this filter to query on conditional based.
If my request query contains a flag or if the flag is true, i need to
append the above filter to query, otherwise the filter should not
I am using Solr 7.1 version and deployed it in standalone mode. I have
created a scheduler in my application itself to perform delta-import
operation based on a pre-configured frequency. I have used the following
lines of code (in java) to invoke delta-import operation
URL url =
All,
How extractingrequest handler internally indexes tika extracted content?
Does it internally calls update processor?
I've custom update document processor that need to work on tika extracted
content and needs to call an API.
Is it that I need to extend that extractingrequesthandler and do
27 matches
Mail list logo