AW: Guideline on when a field absolutely needs to be stored?

THX! -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Walter Underwood [mailto:wun...@wunderwood.org] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. Januar 2018 08:27 An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Betreff: Re: Guideline on when a field absolutely needs to be stored? There is a nice table for all of the field options.

Re: Guideline on when a field absolutely needs to be stored?

There is a nice table for all of the field options. https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_2/field-properties-by-use-case.html wunder Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > On Jan 17, 2018, at 11:23 PM, Clemens Wyss DEV wrote:

Guideline on when a field absolutely needs to be stored?

Kind of "basic question" ... Am I right, that the only real reason to store a field (stored="true") is when I want to fetch the "originating value" from documents returned? What about geo-location-fields? Any other reason/(search-)function requiring a field being stored? Thx Clemens

Re: Partial results from streaming expressions (i.e. making them "stream")

Hi Joel, thanks for your follow-up! Indeed, that's my experience as well - that the export handler streams data fast enough. Though now that you mention batches, I'm curious if that batch size is configurable or something like that. The higher level issue is that I need to show results to the

Re: Adding a child doc incrementally

If the document routing can be arranged such that the children and the parent are always co-located in the same shard, and share an identifier, the graph query can pull back the parent plus any arbitrary number of "children" that have been added at any time in any order. In this scheme "children"

Re: Doubts regarding usage of block join query

So is there any way to solve the above problem? On Jan 18, 2018 1:31 AM, "Mikhail Khludnev" wrote: > sure > > On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 9:39 PM, Aashish Agarwal > wrote: > > > Hello, > > I tried to use block join query feature in solr 4.6.0. My data is in >

Re: Spatial search - indexing WKT data

It's been a while since I did it, but I'm pretty sure that when I indexed polygons a couple years ago, I just sent WKT text for the field value... I think i do recall some niggle where there was some slight mismatch in wkt accepted by the javascript library I wanted to use and solr. (One was

Re: Solr Exception: Undefined Field

Deepak Would you like to write your post again without asterisks? Include the asterisks which are necessary to the query of course. Rick On January 17, 2018 1:10:28 PM EST, Deepak Goel wrote: >*Hello* > >*In Solr Admin: I type the q parameter as - * > >*text_entry:** > >*It

Re: trivia question: why q=*:* doesn't return same result as q.alt=*:*

Chris / Hoss Thanks for the detailed explanation. Erick Erickson's explanation made sense to me but it didn't explain the part why the fields are different for 'hello' vs '*:*' . I had never paid much attention the parser part of query handling and so far focused only on the field definitions. I

Re: Solr 7 spatial search and WKT

Hi Emir I’ve been following one of the only examples I could find on how to index a POLYGON, which does specify the field as multiValued: Configuration: schema.xml Index a polygon (JavaScript syntax around WKT): {"id":"1", "geo_rpt": "POLYGON((30 10, 10 20, 20 40, 40 40, 30 10))”} Indexing

Re: Doubts regarding usage of block join query

sure On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 9:39 PM, Aashish Agarwal wrote: > Hello, > I tried to use block join query feature in solr 4.6.0. My data is in > database but since 4.6 does not support DIH with child=true, so I created > the csv in order list of child followed by parent. > I

Re: Querying on sum of child documents

Hello, It should be something like {!parent ... score=total}+description:support +exp:[3 TO 7] {!func}exp On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 3:05 PM, Prathyusha Kondeti wrote: > Hi, > I have the following indexed documents > { >"id":"data1", >"isParent":"1", >

Re: Partial results from streaming expressions (i.e. making them "stream")

I'm not sure I understand the issue fully. From a streaming standpoint, you get real streamed data from the /export handler. When you use the export handler the bitset for the search results is materialized in memory, but all result are sorted/streamed in batches. This allows the exported handler

Re: Need help with solr highlighting feature

Hello Steve, Sorry to disturb, the issue was due to custom tokenizer that I used. Since that was not storing offset so term vector was not working. Its resolved now. On Jan 17, 2018 11:06 PM, "Steve Rowe" wrote: > Hi Aashish, > > Which version of Solr are you using? > >

Solr Exception: Undefined Field

*Hello* *In Solr Admin: I type the q parameter as - * *text_entry:** *It gives the following exception (In the schema I do see a field as text_entry):* { "responseHeader":{ "zkConnected":true, "status":400, "QTime":2, "params":{ "q":"text_entry:*", "_":"1516190134181"}}, "error":{ "metadata":[

Re: [EXTERNAL] Highlighter is not working for wildcard query

UNSUBSCRIBE On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 10:19 AM, David M Giannone wrote: > > > > > Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S® 6, an AT 4G LTE smartphone > > > Original message > From: Selvam Raman > Date: 1/17/18 11:47 AM (GMT-05:00) > To:

Re: Need help with solr highlighting feature

Hi Aashish, Which version of Solr are you using? Please share your configuration: highlighter and schema. -- Steve www.lucidworks.com > On Jan 16, 2018, at 12:20 PM, Aashish Agarwal wrote: > > Hello, > > I am using solr highlighting feature on multivalued field

Re: [EXTERNAL] Highlighter is not working for wildcard query

Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S® 6, an AT 4G LTE smartphone Original message From: Selvam Raman Date: 1/17/18 11:47 AM (GMT-05:00) To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Highlighter is not working for wildcard query Hi, solr version 6.4.2

Re: Highlighter is not working for wildcard query

Query Parser defType=edismax On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 4:47 PM, Selvam Raman wrote: > Hi, > > solr version 6.4.2 > > hl.method = unified, hl.bs.type=Word, this setting working fine for normal > queries but failed in wildcard queries.(tried other hl.bs.type parmeter

Highlighter is not working for wildcard query

Hi, solr version 6.4.2 hl.method = unified, hl.bs.type=Word, this setting working fine for normal queries but failed in wildcard queries.(tried other hl.bs.type parmeter and without hl.bs.type as well, highlighting not working for wildcard queries) hl.method = original, this is working fine for

Re: Combine Results with Two different Collections.

If you just want docs from both collections in the same results, create an alias across the 2 collections. https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/collections-api.html On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 11:12 PM, Suman Saurabh wrote: > Try using solr streaming api. >

Querying on sum of child documents

Hi, I have the following indexed documents { "id":"data1", "isParent":"1", "_childDocuments":[ { "description": "Benefit and Payroll consultant with HR team support ", "isParent":"2", "exp":2 }, { "description":" ERP Avalon

Re: Multi-core logging - can't tell which core?

On 1/17/2018 5:24 AM, Mark Sullivan wrote: I am migrating a good number of cores over to the latest instance of solr (well, 7.1.0) installed locally. It is working well, but my code is occasionally sending requests to search or index an old field that was replaced in the schema. I see this

Re: modify number of Shard

Thanks Erick!!! With Warm Regards... Sushil K. Tripathi From: Erick Erickson Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 11:02 AM To: solr-user Subject: Re: modify number of Shard If you're using the default compositeId routing then this will not

Re: Partial results from streaming expressions (i.e. making them "stream")

Hello, I have some updates on this, but it's still not very clear for me how to move forward. The good news is, that between sources and decorators, data seems to be really streamed. I hope I tested this the right way, by simply adding a log message to ReducerStream saying "hey, I got this

Multi-core logging - can't tell which core?

I am migrating a good number of cores over to the latest instance of solr (well, 7.1.0) installed locally. It is working well, but my code is occasionally sending requests to search or index an old field that was replaced in the schema. I see this in the logging, but I can't determine which

Re: How to implement the function of W/N in Solr?

Hi, Can you share the output with debugQuery=true. Note that 3w means there are max 2 words between those two phrases. Regards, Emir -- Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection Solr & Elasticsearch Consulting Support Training - http://sematext.com/ > On 15 Jan 2018, at

Re: Solr 7 spatial search and WKT

Hi Leila, I haven’t been using spatial in a while and did not test this, but based on error, it seems that multivalue is not supported for this field type. Can you index a single MULTIPOLYGON? Why do you need to have multiple values? Can you flat your geometry to a single MULTIPOLYGON or