Re: Oracle OpenJDK to Amazon Corretto OpenJDK

Thanks, Jan. The issue is created here - https://github.com/docker-solr/docker-solr/issues/289 On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 7:13 PM Jan Høydahl wrote: > I poked around a bit and ended up reading this thead > https://github.com/docker-library/openjdk/issues/320 < > https://github.com/docker-library/

Re: Oracle OpenJDK to Amazon Corretto OpenJDK

I poked around a bit and ended up reading this thead https://github.com/docker-library/openjdk/issues/320 Appears that the ‘openjdk’ official docker image is NOT the adoptopenjdk disto, but a RedHat-build binary build of the latest official

Re: Oracle OpenJDK to Amazon Corretto OpenJDK

: Link to the issue was helpful. : : Although, when I take a look at Dockerfile for any Solr version from here : https://github.com/docker-solr/docker-solr, the very first line says : FROM openjdk...It : does not say FROM adoptopenjdk. Am I missing something? Ahhh ... I have no idea, But at lea

Re: How do I send multiple user version parameter value for a delet by id request with multiple IDs ?

: Subject: How do I send multiple user version parameter value for a delet by id : request with multiple IDs ? If you're talking about Solr's normal optimistic concurrency version constraints then you just pass '_version_' with each delete block... https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_4

Re: Oracle OpenJDK to Amazon Corretto OpenJDK

Chris, Link to the issue was helpful. Although, when I take a look at Dockerfile for any Solr version from here https://github.com/docker-solr/docker-solr, the very first line says FROM openjdk...It does not say FROM adoptopenjdk. Am I missing something? On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 1:58 PM Chris Hos

How do I send multiple user version parameter value for a delet by id request with multiple IDs ?

http://solr:port/collection/update?version_field=1234582.0 works for the payload {"delete":[{"id":"51"},{"id":"5"}]} with multiple ids and the version parameter is applied to both requests. Is it possible to send separate version numbers for the ids in the parameter ? -- Sent from: https:/

Re: Oracle OpenJDK to Amazon Corretto OpenJDK

Just upgrade? This has been fixed in most recent versions of AdoptOpenJDK builds... https://github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/openjdk-build/issues/465 hossman@slate:~$ java8 hossman@slate:~$ java -XshowSettings:properties -version 2>&1 | grep -e vendor -e version java.class.version = 52.0 java.ru

Re: Oracle OpenJDK to Amazon Corretto OpenJDK

I would ask your legal team why they want to get away from oracle? Because it’s oracle is not a good enough reason. Because we don’t want to pay support fees is valid but not applicable here, because we don’t want to be tied to a single vendor is valid but questionable here, you can at least chall

Re: Oracle OpenJDK to Amazon Corretto OpenJDK

Right, but java.vendor and java.vm.vendor properties are set to Amazon instead of Oracle. So in your previous output how do you know if it is AdoptOpenJDK? On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 1:28 PM Kevin Risden wrote: > Had a thought to test Docker corretto with the same output - the vendor is > still lis

Re: Oracle OpenJDK to Amazon Corretto OpenJDK

Had a thought to test Docker corretto with the same output - the vendor is still listed as java.specification.vendor = Oracle Corporation docker run --rm -it amazoncorretto:8 java -XshowSettings:properties -version Property settings: awt.toolkit = sun.awt.X11.XToolkit file.encoding = ANSI

Re: Oracle OpenJDK to Amazon Corretto OpenJDK

Whoops forgot to share the same output from latest. The docker images are clearly building from AdoptOpenJDK so specification vendor is potentially misleading? ➜ ~ docker pull solr Using default tag: latest latest: Pulling from library/solr Digest: sha256:ef1f2241c1aa51746aa3ad05570123eef128d98e9

Re: Oracle OpenJDK to Amazon Corretto OpenJDK

What specific Solr tag are you using? That looks like JDK 1.8 and an older version. Just picking the current latest as an example: https://github.com/docker-solr/docker-solr/blob/394ead2fa128d90afb072284bce5f1715345c53c/8.4/Dockerfile which uses openjdk:11-stretch and looking up that is https:

Re: Oracle OpenJDK to Amazon Corretto OpenJDK

Maybe you can give them an estimate of how much work it will be. See if legal will put it on their budget. Free software isn’t free, especially the “free kittens” kind. This guy offers consulting for custom Docker images. https://pythonspeed.com/about/ wunder Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood

Re: Solr 7.7 heap space is getting full

This is happening when the no of indexed document count is increasing. With 1 million docs it's working fine but when it's crossing 4.5 million it's heap space is getting full. On Wed, 22 Jan, 2020, 7:05 PM Michael Gibney, wrote: > Rajdeep, you say that "suddenly" heap space is getting full

Re: Oracle OpenJDK to Amazon Corretto OpenJDK

Thanks for the helpful information. It is a no-go because even though it is OpenJDK and free, vendor is Oracle and legal dept. at our company is trying to get away from anything Oracle. It is little paranoid reaction, I agree. See the java.vendor property in following output. $ java -XshowSetting

Re: Re: Re: Anyone have experience with Query Auto-Suggestor?

Hi all, reviving this thread. For those of you who use an external file for your suggestions, how do you decide from your query logs what suggestions to include? Just starting out with some exploratory analysis of clicks, dwell times, etc., and would love to hear from the community any advise.

Re: Oracle OpenJDK to Amazon Corretto OpenJDK

Yep, the OpenJDK in Solr image is pure open source, no Oracle license required. If I’m not mistaken it is the AdoptOpenJdk distro under the hoods, which will receive patches for several years unlike Oracles openjdk distro that is only updated for 6 months. For every Solr release we refresh all

Re: Oracle OpenJDK to Amazon Corretto OpenJDK

Indeed, only Oracle JDK is affected by the commercial license, not OpenJDK, as can be read here: https://www.baeldung.com/oracle-jdk-vs-openjdk Point 5 specifically. Also explained here: https://www.quora.com/Does-using-OpenJDK-provide-a-way-to-be-safe-from-Oracle-Java-Licensing-fee On Fri, Jan

Re: Oracle OpenJDK to Amazon Corretto OpenJDK

Why is it a no-go? It’s free too. > On Jan 31, 2020, at 12:31 AM, Arnold Bronley wrote: > > Hi, > > I use Solr docker images from https://hub.docker.com/_/solr/. It uses > Oracle OpenJDK. It is a no go for where I work. What is the best way to > replace this JDK with some other OpenJDK such as

Re: Easiest way to export the entire index

Hi Amanda, I did this https://github.com/freedev/solr-import-export-json and works with/without cursormark, in case your index does not have an unique key (primary key). On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 1:18 PM Amanda Shuman wrote: > Thanks all! > > I wasn't familiar with using curl at the command lin

Re: Easiest way to export the entire index

Thanks all! I wasn't familiar with using curl at the command line at all, but I did try a basic curl yesterday based on this thread, admin console attribute syntax, and the tutorial in solr documentation ( https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_4/solr-tutorial.html) and was able to produce the fil

Re: Shards.preference to current leader

Once again Erick much appreciate for the reply! I didn't realise updates forwarded to all NRT replicas for real time gets, I was under the impression it was eventually. That totally answers my question and relieves my concerns! Cheers Karl On 31/01/2020, 00:38, "Erick Erickson" wrote:

RE: Timeout occurred while waiting response from server

Thank you Shawn, Found out the timeout can be increased in the solr.xml but going to go with the async approach instead. It gives a much better overview on the status of the backup, which is something we need for monitoring purposes. Thanks, Daniel -Original Message- From: Shawn H