Thank you Shawn for the valuable inputs.
I am assuming, please correct me if I am wrong =>
If we have two fields one has a large amount of text wrt to a field with
shorter text like description and title.
So, the Number of the tokens created for the description field will be much
high w.r.t. the t
This blog gets more specific with some of the ideas behind the eval
expression:
https://joelsolr.blogspot.com/2017/04/having-talk-with-solr-using-new-echo.html
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 12:21 PM Joel Bernstein wrote:
> You could have a program that
You could have a program that writes a Streaming Expression
programmatically then use eval to run it. You can also save Streaming
Expression data structures: tuple, list, array etc... and eval them into
live streams that can be iterated.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, No
Hi Shivram,
I think the short answer is "no". At least, not without sub-classing
some of the JSON-Facet classes in SolrJ.
But it's hard for me to understand your particular concern without
seeing a concrete example. If you provide an example (maybe in the
form of a JUnit test snippet showing th
Hi Irina,
Yes, the "fromIndex" parameter can be used to perform a join from the
host collection to a separate, single-shard collection in SolrCloud.
If specified, this "fromIndex" collection must be present on whichever
host is processing the request. (Often this involves over-replicating
your "f
Having not heard back, I thought I would ask again whether anyone else has been
able to use security.json to disallow deletes, and/or if anyone has examples of
using the "method" section in
lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_4/rule-based-authorization-plugin.html
-Original Message-
From: Oa
Hello,
I'm trying to restore Solr and I'm getting a timeout error, e.g. Timeout
occurred when waiting response from server at http://solrserver:8983/solr
It then says 'could not restore core'. There are just under 40 million records
to restore so I understand this will take some time.
What tim
On 11/19/2020 2:12 AM, Ajay Sharma wrote:
Earlier we were searching in 6 fields i.e qf is applied on 6 fields like
below
We merged all these 6 fields into one field X and now while searching we
using this single filed X
We are able to see a decrease in index size but the response time h
Hi All,
Earlier we were searching in 6 fields i.e qf is applied on 6 fields like
below
A
B
C
D
E
F
We had assumed if we reduced the number of fields being used to search then
the index size and response time both will decrease.
We merged all these 6 fields into one field X and now
