Hi,
We did some tests with 4 shards / 4 different tomcat instances on the
same server and the average latency was smaller than the one when having
only one shard.
We tested also é shards on different servers and the performance results
were also worse.
It seems that the sharding does not make
Hi,
You are right, it is a mistake in my phrase, for the tests with 4
shards/ 4 instances, the latency was worse (therefore *bigger*) than
for the tests with one shard.
In our case, the query rate is high.
Thanks,
Anca
On 10/30/2014 03:48 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 10/30/2014 4:32 AM, Anca
Hi,
We have a SolrCloud configuration of 10 servers, no sharding, 20
millions of documents, the index has 26 GB.
As the number of documents has increased recently, the performance of
the cluster decreased.
We thought of sharding the index, in order to measure the latency. What
is the best
is 4.5.1 (we tried 4.6.0, but we had some problems with this version,
detailed in the mail : SolrCloud 4.6.0 - leader election issue).
Related to Connection reset exception, is there any other tests that we can
do in order to the cause of it ?
Thank you,
Anca
On 12/20/2013 11:07 AM, Anca Kopetz wrote
Hi,
I tested the BoostQueryParser and it works on the simplified example.
But we need to keep the edismax Query parser, so I tried the following query
and it seems to work (I defined a local bf='' for qq).
q=beautiful Christmas tree
mm=2
qf=title^12 description^2
defType=edismax
, Anca Kopetz wrote:
Hi,
Thank you for your response.
When I try the URL you sent me, I get the following error message :
org.apache.solr.search.SyntaxError: Infinite Recursion detected parsing query
'beautiful Christmas tree'
Any idea what this means ?
Best regards,
Anca
On 12/16/2013 02:00 PM
] http://search-lucene.com/m/nK6t9j1fuc2
On Monday, December 16, 2013 12:19 PM, Anca Kopetz
anca.kop...@kelkoo.commailto:anca.kop...@kelkoo.com wrote:
Hi,
How to boost documents that contain all search terms in several of its fields ?
Below you cand find a simplified example :
The query
a concurrent garbage collector as a side note -
stop the world pauses should be avoided. Just good advice :)
- Mark
On Dec 18, 2013, at 5:48 AM, Anca Kopetz
anca.kop...@kelkoo.commailto:anca.kop...@kelkoo.com wrote:
Hi,
In our SolrCloud cluster (2 shards, 8 replicas), the replicas go from time
the recovery, as I explained in the reply to
Mark's mail.
Best regards,
Anca Kopetz
On 12/19/2013 06:39 PM, Daniel Collins wrote:
Are you using a NRT solution, how often do you commit? We see similar
issues with PeerSync, but then we have a very active NRT system and we
soft-commit sub-second, so
Kopetz
--
/mail/u/0/s/?view=attth=14305504e63dc8a1attid=0.1.1disp=embzwatsh=1
Anca Kopetz Software engineer
E anca.kop...@kelkoo.com Y!Messenger kelkooancak
T +33 (0)4 56 09 07 55
A 4/6 Rue des Meridiens 38130 Echirolles
/mail/u/0/s/?view=attth=14305504e63dc8a1attid=0.1.2disp=embzwatsh=1
riptor - reading it from system property
2013-12-05 14:01:22,860 [RecoveryThread] INFO org.apache.solr.cloud.RecoveryStrategy:doRecovery:495 - Finished recovery process. core=fr_green
Best regards,
Anca Kopetz
--
Anca Kopetz Software engineer
E anca.kop...@kelkoo.comY!Messenger kelkooancak
T 33 (0)4 56 09 07 5
to add a boost on all search fields, the same way we do with pf on one field :
pf=title:2^3.0 ?
Thank you,
Anca
--
Anca Kopetz Software engineer
E anca.kop...@kelkoo.comY!Messenger kelkooancak
T 33 (0)4 56 09 07 55
A 4/6 Rue des Meridiens 38130 Echirolles
Kelkoo SAS
Société par
=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13822482.
Any feedback is welcome.
Best regards,
Anca Kopetz
Kelkoo SAS
Société par Actions Simplifiée
Au capital de € 4.168.964,30
Siège social : 8, rue du Sentier 75002 Paris
425 093 069 RCS Paris
Ce message et les pièces jointes sont
Hi Ken,
Have you managed to find out why these entries were stored into filterCache and
if they have an impact on the hit ratio ?
We noticed the same problem, there are entries of this type :
item_+(+(title:western^10.0 | ... in our filterCache.
Thanks,
Anca
On 07/02/2013 09:01 PM, Ken
Hi,
[I am sending again my message to the mailing list, as well as Shawn's reply.
Thanks Shawn for your explanations]
We are trying to improve the performance of our Solr Search application in
terms of QPS (queries per second).
We tuned SOLR settings (e.g. mergeFactor=3), launched several
them.
Best regards,
Anca
On 08/05/2013 10:42 AM, Anca Kopetz wrote:
Please read and follow this note about thread hijacking:
http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijackhttp://people.apache.org/%7Ehossman/#threadhijackhttp://people.apache.org/%7Ehossman/#threadhijack
Optimizing
servers; 2 shards / 4 replicas
Hardware configuration: 2 Processors (16CPU cores) per server; 24GB of memory;
6GB allocated to JVM
Index: 13M documents, 15GB
Search algorithm : grouping, faceting, filter queries
Solr version 4.4
Best regards,
Anca Kopetz
Kelkoo
Hi,
We have a solr cloud cluster with 2 different collections, each
collection having many nodes. We try to get the status of each
collection using CoreAdminRequest.
The code gets all live nodes from the cluster and sends a request to
each node until it gets a valid response.
We would like to
18 matches
Mail list logo